On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 19:05 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 23:31 +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> > Ubuntu, for example, delivers libdb4.6, libdb4.7, and libdb4.8 for
> > libraries. (I'm running BackTrack 5, which is based off 10.04, so this
> > is a bit dated.) The distro sim
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-copyright/rev/d63a82a5f93f
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1567)
Looks good. Illumos needs to fix
https://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL
--
Guido Berhoerster
__
This is because Berkeley DB used to be famously bad at back/forward
compatible of ABI or API. (it at least used to be the canonical
example of sucking at it).
It doesn't seem wise to ship just one 'bdb' unless someone can say for
certain that they got better, otherwise it's just asking for troubl
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 20:53 +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> In general, if you move packages from another consolidation into
> oi-build please at least check the original package.
Right problem defined at the wrong level: we don't want participation in
porting to gate on checking all the legacy
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
> > bdb.
> > Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bdb-5.2)?
>
> Can you or he give examples of why one
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 23:31 +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > > Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
> > > bdb.
> > > Thoughts about having
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-03 22:37]:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:57PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> > * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> > > Any issues with merging this?
> > >
> > > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
> > >
> > > (https://www.illumos.org/i
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
> bdb.
> Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bdb-5.2)?
Can you or he give examples of why one would want that? It would be a
nuisance, because one would have to dec
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:57PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> > Any issues with merging this?
> >
> > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
> >
> > (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> bdb 4.8.30 is currentl
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
>
> Thanks,
bdb 4.8.30 is currently delivered by oi-sfe, the specfile seems
to be maintained at SFE and already provides
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:56:26PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
> > Any issues with merging this?
> >
> > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-gnupg/rev/6e09047a6043
> >
> > (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1220)
>
> if you create this link for
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> A few items, as much questions as anything else:
>
> 1) given that you usually end up needing multiple bdbs, should the
> standard here be to embed version components into the name?
Yeah... does pkg:/database/bdb-4.8 sound better?
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-fetchmail/rev/63536c7f3b6f
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1590)
>
> Thanks,
Might be worth mentioning somewhere (in bug/commit
message/advisory that this addresses
http://blogs.or
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:35:36PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > Any issues with merging this?
> >
> > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-xcowsay/rev/e11ec815dd5b
> >
> > (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1589)
>
> 1) I'm not familiar
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 08:53:24PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
> > Any issues with merging this?
> >
> > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-irssi/rev/32d69da311d7
> >
> > (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1576)
>
> * there are two patches in t
Hi,
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-gnupg/rev/6e09047a6043
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1220)
if you create this link for gpg2 you should also create it for
gpgv2 for consistency and also add symlinks for thei
Hi,
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-irssi/rev/32d69da311d7
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1576)
* there are two patches in the JDS package, are they still
applicable?
* Perl modules are delivered in the wrong
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-xcowsay/rev/e11ec815dd5b
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1589)
1) I'm not familiar with this package, but why are things like CFLAGS
being set in source patches t
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-fetchmail/rev/63536c7f3b6f
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1590)
LGTM
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-irssi/rev/32d69da311d7
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1576)
1) I'm not sure that the /usr/etc prefix is consistent with
Solaris/Illumos practice; anyone know if
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-gnupg/rev/6e09047a6043
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1220)
If the bug report is agreed, I reckon there needs to be a comment
summarising this. Anything that has
A few items, as much questions as anything else:
1) given that you usually end up needing multiple bdbs, should the
standard here be to embed version components into the name?
2) is there any basis for thinking that bdb should only be built for
32-bit support, or would we reasonably expect that 64
On Sun, 2011-10-02 at 21:07 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 08:13:35PM -0400, cwjorda...@cox.net wrote:
> >
> > Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > Oh, I see, I did not realize it was just a template. I agree it
> > shouldn't say Oracle. I'm afraid I don't know if O
23 matches
Mail list logo
