Am 2012-08-30 22:18, schrieb garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com:
Again, you misunderstood what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about
open vs. closed at all.
So let me clarify:
What is *broken* was the model of slavishly trying to follow OpenSolaris, or to be an
"open & free" alternative to
Hi,
I wanted to avoid this but I cannot stop myself forever to hear without
reaction.
On 31.08.2012 01:53, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
On Aug 30, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
So let me clarify:
What is *broken* was
garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com writes:
> So then, I have just a single question: What is the compelling
> reason for doing all this effort? Why not just load up Ubuntu on
> your desktop (or buy a Mac, or even run *cough* Windows) and run
> illumos bits in a VM?
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2012/Au
On 08/31/2012 11:14 AM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
> garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com writes:
>> So then, I have just a single question: What is the compelling
>> reason for doing all this effort? Why not just load up Ubuntu on
>> your desktop (or buy a Mac, or even run *cough* Windows) and run
>> illumos
Guys, Please,
This is a developer mailing list.
If you want to help OpenIndiana please go to the issue tracker :) at
https://www.illumos.org/projects/openindiana/issues
Thanks,
--
Piotr Jasiukajtis
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
htt
Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
[...]
This crap I heard for years inside Sun. Rumor say half of laptops used
by Sun employees (and paid by Sun) were Macs in last year. And the
most of core developers were not using Solaris on their laptops. With
very same excuse. Now the question - why should new
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:28:46 +0200, Jean-Pierre André wrote:
Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
[...]
This crap I heard for years inside Sun. Rumor say half of laptops used
by Sun employees (and paid by Sun) were Macs in last year. And the
most of core developers were not using Solaris on their laptops.
> Think of why no open developer has ported LibreOffice,
> whose original design comes AFAIK from Sun.
I got to the point that this almost compiled on an OI u4 machine (and
I'm not ex-Sun) delivering my changes back to LibreOffice.
Most of the changes in the LO code were to remove the Sun Compi
Hi Yuri,
Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:28:46 +0200, Jean-Pierre André wrote:
Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
[...]
This crap I heard for years inside Sun. Rumor say half of laptops used
by Sun employees (and paid by Sun) were Macs in last year. And the
most of core developers were not u
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
So then, I have just a single question: What is the compelling
reason for doing all this effort? Why not just load up Ubuntu on
your desktop (or buy a Mac, or even run *cough* Windows) and run
illumos bits in a VM?
This position you a
2012-08-31 19:43, Bob Friesenhahn пишет:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
So then, I have just a single question: What is the compelling reason
for doing all this effort? Why not just load up Ubuntu on your
desktop (or buy a Mac, or even run *cough* Windows) and run illu
Am 2012-08-31 18:02, schrieb Jim Klimov:
That's what I said, though you phrased it better - thanks ;)
Now, there is a problem with those devices that OI does not see
and can't pass through - such as USB3 ports, or use (such as my
troubles with Wifi and SATA, and I'm not certain about sound
wor
Hi Bob,
Bob Friesenhahn píše v pá 31. 08. 2012 v 10:43 -0500:
>
> Current OpenIndiana is satisfactory for most things that I need and
> it
> only lacks ready-made packages for Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice,
> and the available Flash plugin. If detractors do not get in the way,
> forward pr
Hi Damian,
Damian Wojslaw píše v pá 31. 08. 2012 v 19:00 +0200:
> Am 2012-08-31 18:02, schrieb Jim Klimov:
> >
> >
> > That's what I said, though you phrased it better - thanks ;)
> >
> > Now, there is a problem with those devices that OI does not see
> > and can't pass through - such as USB3 port
Bob Friesenhahn wrote on 08/31/2012 10:43:14
AM:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
> >
> > So then, I have just a single question: What is the compelling
> > reason for doing all this effort? Why not just load up Ubuntu on
> > your desktop (or buy a Mac, or even run *coug
On Aug 31, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Damian Wojslaw wrote:
> Am 2012-08-31 18:02, schrieb Jim Klimov:
>>
>>
>> That's what I said, though you phrased it better - thanks ;)
>>
>> Now, there is a problem with those devices that OI does not see
>> and can't pass through - such as USB3 ports, or use (su
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Milan Jurik wrote:
Current OpenIndiana is satisfactory for most things that I need and
it
only lacks ready-made packages for Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice,
and the available Flash plugin. If detractors do not get in the way,
forward progress will resume, and these packag
On 08/31/2012 07:50 PM, garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com wrote:
>
> On Aug 31, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Damian Wojslaw wrote:
>
>> Am 2012-08-31 18:02, schrieb Jim Klimov:
>>>
>>>
>>> That's what I said, though you phrased it better - thanks ;)
>>>
>>> Now, there is a problem with those devices that OI does
The Apache-OpenOffice SPARC build is at 3.4.1:
http://adfinis-sygroup.ch/aoo-solaris-sparc
https://adfinis-sygroup.ch/file-exchange-public/tag-AOO341/README.html
https://adfinis-sygroup.ch/file-exchange-public/tag-AOO341/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.1_Solaris_Sparc_install-arc_en-US.tar.gz
~
> > Unfortunately, I don't believe that getting good USB3 type
> performance is possible with our current USB stack.
Having that said, is it possible to bring in a quick solution - support USB3
ports at whatever the performance hits our architecture gives7
I hope that would be enough for a mou
Hi Folks,
I just read the message from Alasdair about his resignation from project.
This is really sad news.
He mentions my problem with MongoDB as sample of ignorance towards OI by
3rd party devs. It is not that bad thogh, mongoDB is a bit wicked as far
as compilation goes anyway and out of ove
On Aug 31, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, I don't believe that getting good USB3 type
> > performance is possible with our current USB stack.
> Having that said, is it possible to bring in a quick solution - support USB3
> ports at whatever the performance hits our
>>
>> USB3 at least is not solely desktop relevant. I have a backburnered plan to
>> work on this.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't believe that getting good USB3 type performance is
>> possible with our current USB stack. (Furthermore, our USB stack is a
>> convoluted mess -- owing largely to t
Hi Milan,
On 30/08/2012 08:46, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
it is not good you resign. And it is not good to see OI going nowhere.
Here I had long e-mail about how stupid is to think OI is threat to
Nexenta (Oracle way of thinking), how irrelevant is what Bryan Cantrill
says, how stupid is to give up
I was just reading through the oi-dev archives (about the resignation
of the OI lead) where a former Sun engineer, claimed that the efforts
made by sun to port OpenSolaris to the desktop/laptop platforms (by
adding wifi support, by making a new audio system, etc), only hurt Sun
in the long run, and
So, are we able to maybe able to set up a bounty on this?
Użytkownik garrett.dam...@dey-sys.com napisał:
>>>
>>> USB3 at least is not solely desktop relevant. I have a backburnered plan
>>> to work on this.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I don't believe that getting good USB3 type performance is
>>>
26 matches
Mail list logo
