Was this ever committed? I reckon we need libdb (I need it for something
ATM), and I don't find it in the history. I'm happy to pick this up and run
with it.
Cheers,
Bayard
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Alasdair Lumsden [2011-10-05 01:31]:
> >
> > On 3 Oct 2011,
* Alasdair Lumsden [2011-10-05 01:31]:
>
> On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:31, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> >>> Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions o
On 4 Oct 2011, at 12:24, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
>> Any issues with merging this?
>>
>> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
>>
>> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> The Userland-gate mirror is back online, so y
Hi Bayard,
On 4 Oct 2011, at 02:09, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> If OI decides now is the time to start delivering, let's at least check
> for other areas of overlap and make sure that we're standing solidly on
> your shoulders. In particular, how about other questions raised, such as
> delivering deb
Hi Guido,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:55, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> Also the documentation should be delivered into
> /usr/share/doc/ and not /usr/docs.
Good catch!
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-d
Hi Jeff, Bayard,
Bayard - nice review points!
On 3 Oct 2011, at 18:06, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> 2) is there any basis for thinking that bdb should only be built for
> 32-bit support, or would we reasonably expect that 64-bit binaries would
> need to link against it?
For a library like bdb, we sh
On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:31, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>>> Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
>>> bdb.
>>> Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bd
Hi Jeff,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 21:12, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
>> A few items, as much questions as anything else:
>>
>> 1) given that you usually end up needing multiple bdbs, should the
>> standard here be to embed version componen
Hi Alex,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 22:08, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Is there some special reason why you are working on this package, given
> that oi-sfe already delivers it and the "Before adding new packages to
> oi-build" remark in
> htt
The other historical problem with BDB is that they have on numerous
occasions changed the on-disk format, so just relinking an application
with a newer lib can easily break applications. That's far worse than
the API instability.
Gordon
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
> This
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
>
> Thanks,
The Userland-gate mirror is back online, so you should have a
look at
http://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/orac
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 19:05 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 23:31 +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> > Ubuntu, for example, delivers libdb4.6, libdb4.7, and libdb4.8 for
> > libraries. (I'm running BackTrack 5, which is based off 10.04, so this
> > is a bit dated.) The distro sim
This is because Berkeley DB used to be famously bad at back/forward
compatible of ABI or API. (it at least used to be the canonical
example of sucking at it).
It doesn't seem wise to ship just one 'bdb' unless someone can say for
certain that they got better, otherwise it's just asking for troubl
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
> > bdb.
> > Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bdb-5.2)?
>
> Can you or he give examples of why one
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 23:31 +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > > Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
> > > bdb.
> > > Thoughts about having
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-03 22:37]:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:57PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> > * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> > > Any issues with merging this?
> > >
> > > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
> > >
> > > (https://www.illumos.org/i
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
> bdb.
> Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bdb-5.2)?
Can you or he give examples of why one would want that? It would be a
nuisance, because one would have to dec
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:57PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> > Any issues with merging this?
> >
> > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
> >
> > (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> bdb 4.8.30 is currentl
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
>
> Thanks,
bdb 4.8.30 is currently delivered by oi-sfe, the specfile seems
to be maintained at SFE and already provides
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> A few items, as much questions as anything else:
>
> 1) given that you usually end up needing multiple bdbs, should the
> standard here be to embed version components into the name?
Yeah... does pkg:/database/bdb-4.8 sound better?
A few items, as much questions as anything else:
1) given that you usually end up needing multiple bdbs, should the
standard here be to embed version components into the name?
2) is there any basis for thinking that bdb should only be built for
32-bit support, or would we reasonably expect that 64
Any issues with merging this?
http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
(https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
Thanks,
Jeff.
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
22 matches
Mail list logo
