Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev writes:
> Maybe I just wasted my time your time, too, with this stupid GNOME sh8t.
[...]
I understand your frustration and anger. Unfortunately, such is life in
a Linux-centric open source world, where most developers don't care much
about portability any more.
However
Maybe I just wasted my time your time, too, with this stupid GNOME sh8t.
Just tried to compile it with clang-90 and it failed, again. Having to edit
meson.build to commenting out flags again.
They can't even make their software compile cleanly without having to turn off
error checking flags.
O
I guest I figured out how to make libdazzle compiles, but I fails at the
linking stage. Not related to the Solaris patch, though. That patch doesn't
help.
Let me describe the problems in details:
libdazzle fails to compile because of a compiler flag. With this flag on, it
will fail with this e
More detail:
Packages needed to install on OI: gcc-10 cmake ninja meson git pkg-config vala
Environment variable to set: export PKG_CONFIG_PATH='/usr/lib/64/pkgconfig'
We're doing a 64 bit build. I don't know why, but gobject-introspection is not
available on/usr/lib/pkgconfig, so we forced to
I'm totally amateur. Please pardon me.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 02:15:15 +0700 Alan Coopersmith
wrote
> On 1/9/21 11:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
> > wrote:
> >> I can say that libdazzle builds on Solaris, but we apply this patch
A PR is too quick. I participated their discourse channel and asked for help:
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/building-of-epiphany-libdazzle-fails-on-openindiana/5302
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 02:03:00 +0700 Vincent Torri
wrote
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
On 1/9/21 11:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
I can say that libdazzle builds on Solaris, but we apply this patch to
make it build:
https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland/blob/master/components/gnome/libdazzle/patches/link.patch
why not d
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
>
> On 1/9/21 12:15 AM, Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev wrote:
> > In no way I'm a professional developer. I just pulled the source of it from
> > github and tried to compile it by following the instructions.
> >
> > https://github.com/GNOME/epiph
On 1/9/21 12:15 AM, Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev wrote:
In no way I'm a professional developer. I just pulled the source of it from
github and tried to compile it by following the instructions.
https://github.com/GNOME/epiphany
Currently, I'm stuck at libdazzle. I will not compile under OI.
htt
Everyone starts like that.
The docs are designed to be read and used even by non developers. The
point of this is to have more developers. The only way to have more
developers and contributors, is to offer resources for training. By
being able to compile software you are already quite far ahea
Maybe you are misunderstood. I'm not that powerful to be able to be a
developer. All of what I did as I described is I trying to build this browser
on OI. Porting is the wrong word. My bad. It's such a too big word to be used.
I'm currently stuck at libdazzle, a dependency of Epiphany. It seemed
Hi
Thanks for the initiative. Will you stay around longer and package some
softwares?
Have you had a look into http://docs.openindiana.org/dev/userland/ It
gives you instructions on how to properly build and package components
for OI. If you get stuck on something we can have a look at your
In no way I'm a professional developer. I just pulled the source of it from
github and tried to compile it by following the instructions.
https://github.com/GNOME/epiphany
Currently, I'm stuck at libdazzle. I will not compile under OI.
https://github.com/GNOME/libdazzle
Any helps would be appr
13 matches
Mail list logo
