Ken Mays
From: Andrzej Szeszo
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] Transitioning from Sun Studio to gcc & clang/llvm
On 05/23/11 04:22 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> Thanks for the feedback, partial answers
On 05/23/11 04:22 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Albert,
Thanks for the feedback, partial answers inline below!
On 23 May 2011, at 16:05, Albert Lee wrote:
Should we be linking libgcc statically (apparently adds on the order
of 10k to every binary) or will every application depend on a package
I doubt Oracle will care about binary compatibility going forward, and I half
expect us not to see any more separate Solaris releases after Solaris 11. If
it is not in Exadata, I don't think Oracle cares.
-- Garrett D'Amore
On May 24, 2011, at 12:13 PM, "Alasdair Lumsden" wrote:
> Hi Guido
Hi Guido,
On 23 May 2011, at 21:29, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 17:22]:
>> This is why the gcc version supplied will be fixed for a 5+ year period - I
>> doubt we'll be changing the gcc version any time soon after doing this. When
>> we do update to a newer GCC or
* Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 17:22]:
> This is why the gcc version supplied will be fixed for a 5+ year period - I
> doubt we'll be changing the gcc version any time soon after doing this. When
> we do update to a newer GCC or to llvm/clang or another compiler, we can
> continue to supply the
On 23 May 2011, at 17:47, Albert Lee wrote:
>>> Should we be linking libgcc statically (apparently adds on the order
>>> of 10k to every binary) or will every application depend on a package
>>> with the gcc libraries?
>>
>> Still open for discussion - what are you/others thoughts? Beyond just th
On 23 May 2011, at 18:52, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 18:29]:
>> Hi Guido,
>>
>> On 23 May 2011, at 16:49, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
>>
>>> * Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 17:22]:
>> 5. Compile and supply llvm/clang
>
> And libc++?
>>>
>>> Note also t
* Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 18:29]:
> Hi Guido,
>
> On 23 May 2011, at 16:49, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
>
> > * Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 17:22]:
> 5. Compile and supply llvm/clang
> >>>
> >>> And libc++?
> >
> > Note also that libc++ aims to be portable across compilers. It
> > mig
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> Thanks for the feedback, partial answers inline below!
>
> On 23 May 2011, at 16:05, Albert Lee wrote:
>> Should we be linking libgcc statically (apparently adds on the order
>> of 10k to every binary) or will every applica
Hi Guido,
On 23 May 2011, at 16:49, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 17:22]:
5. Compile and supply llvm/clang
>>>
>>> And libc++?
>
> Note also that libc++ aims to be portable across compilers. It
> might be worth asking whether they plan to make any commitments
>
* Alasdair Lumsden [2011-05-23 17:22]:
> >> 5. Compile and supply llvm/clang
> >
> > And libc++?
Note also that libc++ aims to be portable across compilers. It
might be worth asking whether they plan to make any commitments
regarding ABI stability (might not be too absurd of an idea now
that cla
Hi Albert,
Thanks for the feedback, partial answers inline below!
On 23 May 2011, at 16:05, Albert Lee wrote:
> Should we be linking libgcc statically (apparently adds on the order
> of 10k to every binary) or will every application depend on a package
> with the gcc libraries?
Still open for di
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As per discussions on IRC, I'd like to formalise plans for the transition
> from Sun Studio to open source compiler suites. This is a medium-term
> transition plan, rather than a sweeping change.
>
> So far the general worki
Hi,
Why not give path64 a try? At least for 64bit bins.
On May 23, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As per discussions on IRC, I'd like to formalise plans for the transition
> from Sun Studio to open source compiler suites. This is a medium-term
> transition plan, rathe
Hi All,
As per discussions on IRC, I'd like to formalise plans for the transition from
Sun Studio to open source compiler suites. This is a medium-term transition
plan, rather than a sweeping change.
So far the general working plan I've put together based on feedback is:
1. Add gcc 4.5.3 suppo
15 matches
Mail list logo
