[Oiio-dev] [oiio] Review: Minor cmake tweaks and comment improvements (#334)

2012-04-19 Thread Larry Gritz
You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/lgritz/oiio lg-cmake Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/pull/334 -- Commit Summary -- * Minor cmake tweaks and comment improvements -- File Changes -- M src/CMa

[Oiio-dev] GSoC applicants -- read this!

2012-04-19 Thread Larry Gritz
There was some kind of glitch in Google's system that caused many students to be emailed accept or reject notices yesterday. I don't know if any of our students were among them, but just in case... THESE ARE WRONG! Final decisions have not been made, and we aren't even finished with rating the

Re: [Oiio-dev] Cineon vs DPX code

2012-04-19 Thread Larry Gritz
IIRC, we need to occasionally read Cineon files for legacy reasons, but couldn't think of a circumstance in which we'd want to write them, so we accepted the plugin code with a reader only. In light of that, I think we can live with the non-existant writer also having the limitation of only bei

[Oiio-dev] [oiio] Port of DPX 10 -> 16 bits promotion fix to Cineon as mentionned in issue #154 (#333)

2012-04-19 Thread jenche
You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/jenche/oiio 91009c26 Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/pull/333 -- Commit Summary -- * Ported changes made to DPX BaseTypeConverter to Cineon (10 bits -> 16 --

Re: [Oiio-dev] Cineon vs DPX code

2012-04-19 Thread Jonathan Gibbs
The cineon spec seems to say the same as dpx. "Valid component sizes are 1-, 8-, 10-, 12-, and 16-bit integers and 32- and 64-bit reals (IEEE floating-point)." and I think it means both Cineon and DPX. But as Jeremy says seeing a float Cineon file in the wild would be really unusual... it's not cl

[Oiio-dev] Build testing

2012-04-19 Thread Richard Shaw
Sorry I can't remember when the last time this was discussed (I've slept since then!) but I was curious what the plan was for getting the build testing back to 100%? I tried running the tests on 1.0.3 but I still get a lot of failures on Linux x86_64 and I'd like to enable the tests for the offici

[Oiio-dev] [oiio] Fix oiiotool argument help + add man page generation (#332)

2012-04-19 Thread Chris Foster
As mentioned on the mailing list, oiiotool man page generation was not being performed. It was very easy to add this, but in the process I also found that some oiiotool command line options had empty doc strings, which caused them to be completely ignored in the usage information given by "oiio

[Oiio-dev] [oiio] Additional small fixes for tinyformat integration (#331)

2012-04-19 Thread Chris Foster
As per the discussion on pull request #328: Remove some spurious appearances of "static" in TINYFORMAT_WRAP_FORMAT usage + small documentation tweaks. You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/c42f/oiio tinyformat Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it onlin

Re: [Oiio-dev] oiiotool is missing manpages

2012-04-19 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi Chris! Hi list! Gmail IMAP server got confused and I deleted your message by mistake ;-) But I had enough time to read it once, so I'd like to thank you for your quick reply and fix. Cheers! -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A

Re: [Oiio-dev] oiiotool is missing manpages

2012-04-19 Thread Chris Foster
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Any idea or timeframe when this part of the code will be fixed? Fixed now, just awaiting a review which shouldn't take long. Here's the pull request for reference: https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/pull/332 Cheers, ~Chris __

Re: [Oiio-dev] oiiotool is missing manpages

2012-04-19 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
On 19/04/2012 12:29, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: For sure it's a big issue, but certainly annoying. s/it's/it's not/ ;-) -- Matteo F. Vescovi Debian Sponsored Maintainer GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A ___ Oiio-dev mailing list Oiio-dev@lists.openimageio.org http

Re: [Oiio-dev] oiiotool: What am I doing wrong?

2012-04-19 Thread Chris Foster
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Tom M wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Stephen Parker > wrote: >> I'm ok with it not being considered high priority, but I wouldn't rule it >> out altogether. We would have used it on TRON. If we can do it using Qt, >> that wouldn't introduce any additio

[Oiio-dev] oiiotool is missing manpages

2012-04-19 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi all! As you can see at [1], Lintian [2] complains about the fact that oiiotool is totally missing a manpage file. For sure it's a big issue, but certainly annoying. Any idea or timeframe when this part of the code will be fixed? Thanks in advance for your efforts in helping on this. Cheers

Re: [Oiio-dev] python questions

2012-04-19 Thread Ben De Luca
Hi lorenzo, Im working off master, I expect it to take me a while to fix all the issues I have seen. I will start pushing back to my fork next week, but I can't submit pull requests back to oiio proper until I get this paperwork stored. -bd On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:37 PM, lorenzo wrot

[Oiio-dev] [oiio] Review: Cineon: remove buggy 32 and 64 bit output, which we don't need anyway (#330)

2012-04-19 Thread Larry Gritz
You can merge this Pull Request by running: git pull https://github.com/lgritz/oiio lg-cineon Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at: https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/pull/330 -- Commit Summary -- * Cineon: remove buggy 32 and 64 bit output, which we don't need anyway --