Hi,
maybe a stupid question: Is there a way to iterate through the
ObjectCache? I didn't find it in the Javadoc.
With kind regards
Bernd Längerich
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Well, step by step, i hope that anything will be fine soon.
DB Connections are well mounted, thank you very much again.
So, I tested my batch processes and i noted that log4j trace disappeared. I
think it's no so hard to resolve (just redirect to my commons logging
setup). But the most
Trace is working now.
May be i have i start of explanation. I saw that 1:n relations are all read
( checked ) , even if no getter (getCollections) exists on mapped object.
That's because my process is running slower i think.
I don't known why this occurs. I guess you're going to tell me that i
Hi Bernd,
Bernd Laengerich wrote:
Hi,
maybe a stupid question: Is there a way to iterate through the
ObjectCache? I didn't find it in the Javadoc.
sorry, this is not possible. If you really need this functionality
please add a feature request in JIRA and the reason why this was useful.
Hi Bruno,
Bruno CROS wrote:
i already have patch torque3.1.1.jar. thanks for advice. I've done since
start with the build.xml of ojb-blank.jar (so torque).
I have the right database generated now. That's a good point and i thank you
all.
On the other hand, i have 2 database connections and it
Hi Chris,
Christopher Lowe wrote:
Hi Armin,
Thanks for the quick turn-around on this bug. How do I download the source
from svn ojb_1_0_release branch?
Do I have to use my browser and click on
each file to download everything, I'm sure there is a better way, please
advise.
Currently the
Following the Armin's advice, i'm currently migrating from 1.0.1 to 1.0.4
I started with the 1.0.4 ojb-blank.jar to replace all files. jar of course,
and configuration ones too.
I stop with Torque (to generate Oracle 9i database) with an
UnkonwnHostException
In 1.0.1 i was targeting with this (
On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following the Armin's advice, i'm currently migrating from 1.0.1 to 1.0.4
I started with the 1.0.4 ojb-blank.jar to replace all files. jar of course,
and configuration ones too.
I stop with Torque (to generate Oracle 9i database) with an
On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, can't see the link with the thread you gave me.
Why not ? Alternatively, you could use the user mailing list archive
link on the OJB site, and check the threads for 30 Jan. The Thread is
called Problems upgrading to ojb1.04.
There is
On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First you will find the ant trace of setup-db task, the torque error is
painted in red.
Second, you will find my build.properties used by the task.
[torque-sql] 2006-02-03 13:21:48,578 [main] INFO
Hi Armin,
Thanks for the quick turn-around on this bug. How do I download the source
from svn ojb_1_0_release branch? Do I have to use my browser and click on
each file to download everything, I'm sure there is a better way, please
advise. How soon will the bug OJB-94 be assigned and fixed. It is
Hi,
I'm facing a problem.
The problem description is as follows:
I insert a record (if the record does not exists for a particular
combination) into a table in a (broker) transaction and try to access
the same record in a different (broker) transaction.
Bang in the bull 's eye!!
the embedded dtd was not 3_0_1 but 3_1. I just change the value and it find
the database.dtd file included en torque.jar
Then i have to add to my build.properties
torque.database.user=
and
torque.database.password=x
and the famous
torque.delimiter=/
Bruno CROS wrote:
Bang in the bull 's eye!!
the embedded dtd was not 3_0_1 but 3_1. I just change the value and it find
the database.dtd file included en torque.jar
Then i have to add to my build.properties
torque.database.user=
and
torque.database.password=x
and the famous
Hi Vagula,
I insert a record (if the record does not exists for a particular
combination) into a table in a (broker) transaction and try to access
the same record in a different (broker) transaction.
Could you give us more details.
OJB version?
Did the second broker instance try to read the
Thanks.
i 'm afraid i need to repatch distributed torque-gen-3.1.1.jar to have
TIMESTAMP jdbc type created for java.sql.Date and java.sql.timestamp as i
wrote in an old old post. (specific to oracle 9i and older )
Does someone confirm that ?
On 2/3/06, Armin Waibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i 'm afraid i need to repatch distributed torque-gen-3.1.1.jar to have
TIMESTAMP jdbc type created for java.sql.Date and java.sql.timestamp as i
wrote in an old old post. (specific to oracle 9i and older )
You might want to try DdlUtils
Hi,
After the insert transaction is committed, I try to read the
same record.
Actually it's like this:
In for loop
TRANSACTION1 BEGIN
I check to see if there is
Record for a
Vagula wrote:
Hi,
After the insert transaction is committed, I try to read the
same record.
Actually it's like this:
In for loop
TRANSACTION1 BEGIN
I check to see if there is
Record for a particular
combination (let's say record for
i already have patch torque3.1.1.jar. thanks for advice. I've done since
start with the build.xml of ojb-blank.jar (so torque).
I have the right database generated now. That's a good point and i thank you
all.
On the other hand, i have 2 database connections and it seems they do not
work
Note that my OJB_DMAP_ENTRIES has not been created !!
On 2/3/06, Bruno CROS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i already have patch torque3.1.1.jar. thanks for advice. I've done since
start with the build.xml of ojb-blank.jar (so torque).
I have the right database generated now. That's a good point
Hello,
I now have spent a lot of time debugging 2 batch processing.
First processing creates a simple 1-n couple of object (consider that class
UnityCar refers a class Unity with 1-n relation) . Creation is done like
this :
- tx.begin()
- Unity u = new Unity()
- tx.lock(u, Transaction.WRITE);
-
Hi All,
I ran the junit test suite for the broker api and got the same
result. When a base class object is deleted the corresponding record in the
database is removed but not the super class object record. I ran only the
testDelete() method in the InheritanceMultipleTableTest class. I'm
Hi Chris,
Christopher Lowe wrote:
Hi All,
I ran the junit test suite for the broker api and got the same
result. When a base class object is deleted the corresponding record in the
database is removed but not the super class object record. I ran only the
testDelete() method in the
Hi Bruno,
in OJB 1.0.2 we fixed a bug with partially materialized objects under
heavy load. Assume that this bug cause your problem.
http://db.apache.org/ojb/release-notes.txt
I would recommend the migration to OJB 1.0.4.
But take care of changes between 1.0.1 and 1.0.4 (e.g. complete
Hi Chris,
I checked in a fix for OJB-93. If possible please test latest version
from SVN OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch. This fix will be included in next
upcoming version (OJB 1.0.5).
regards,
Armin
Armin Waibel wrote:
Hi Chris,
Christopher Lowe wrote:
Hi All,
I ran the junit test suite
Hi All,
I have the following relationship. A Supplier has several
products (Rooms) and each product has several rates. Room is a Product hence
an inheritance relationship between them. The mappings are defined below.
I'm trying to perform a simple query to return the suppliers with
Hi Chris,
Christopher Lowe wrote:
Hi All,
I have the following relationship. A Supplier has several
products (Rooms) and each product has several rates. Room is a Product hence
an inheritance relationship between them. The mappings are defined below.
I'm trying to perform a simple
Hi,
please forget all I wrote :)
I had a error at the definition of the pk of A. A second row was defined
as primary key too.
I think that I ran in this problem during my tests. This maybe why the
autoload was working
when I started. With the invalid pk definition the test case wouldn't
On 2/1/06, Milisic Aleksandar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem solved. For future reference if anybody runs
into this problem, the torque.delimiter in
build-torque.xml needs to be set to / since the
generated SQL uses the / to separate sql statements.
Perhaps this should be somewhere in
Hi,
I'm using ojb 1.0 rc1 in a signed applet.
Without warning, this applet is not working when I try to modify
repository.xml.
The error message is:
[BOOT] ERROR: Error in instantiation of PersistenceBrokerFactory class
Could not read repository class descriptor data, using repository:
the applet can propbably not find the repository in it's class path. Try to
stuff everything in a jar and use that jar instead of a single class.
2006/2/1, alessandro olivieri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'm using ojb 1.0 rc1 in a signed applet.
Without warning, this applet is not working when I
I have create a jar with my applet and all business function, including or
not my repository.xml, i have signed this jar, but the result is always the
same:
[BOOT] ERROR:
It seems that the problem happens only if I change my repository.
From: Dennis Bekkering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Hi Jacob,
Every relation is defined. But in the report queries I can only specify
the columns in String[] {}, I wish I could specify the queries as well
and pass it in Object[] {}, just like it is done for Criteria methods.
F.e :
Query qB = QueryFactory.newReportQuery(B.class); // SELECT
Hi,
I have a problem with a java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 1
I have the following:
class A
{
Integer pkA
};
class B
{
Integer pkA // is PK
Integer pkB // is PK too
Integer otherField;
};
B has 2 primary key fields and A only one.
So the first field pkA of Class (and table ) B is
I'm a newbie trying to get into OJB.
I downloaded 1.0.4 src and unzipped it
When I run bin\build.bat from command window, it fails with over 100 duplicate
class errors, example:
duplicate class: org.apache.ojb.broker.Identity
I have JAVA_HOME set to a java5 jdk.
What is wrong?
Can anyone point
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone point me to a getting started kind of document?
Only follow the link:
http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/getting-started.html
regards,
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a newbie trying to get into OJB.
I downloaded 1.0.4 src and unzipped it
When I run bin\build.bat from command window, it fails with over 100 duplicate
class errors, example:
duplicate class: org.apache.ojb.broker.Identity
I have JAVA_HOME set to a java5 jdk.
Hi All,
I have an inheritance relationship between my Product and Car
objects. New inserts of car objects work fine. The problem I'm experiencing
is that when I remove a car the corresponding product record is not being
removed from the product table. The mappings are shown below. I'm
Hi Chris,
which api do you use?
Armin
Christopher Lowe wrote:
Hi All,
I have an inheritance relationship between my Product and Car
objects. New inserts of car objects work fine. The problem I'm experiencing
is that when I remove a car the corresponding product record is not being
But why would Torque not work? It is contained in the
ojb-blank.jar and throughout the ojb documentation and
in the examples I can only see Torque in use. Has
anybody else had problems using the new version of
Torque in ojb1.04, because if there is a solution I
would like to continue using
hi sergey,
this looks like a report query to me. do you have relationships defined
between A, B, C, D ?
jakob
Manukyan, Sergey schrieb:
Folks,
Could you please advice an OJB solution for this SQL query:
SELECT
A.F,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM B INNER JOIN A ON A.F = B.F),
Hi Armin,
I'm using the PersistenceBroker API.
Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:08 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Super class record not being deleted.
Hi Chris,
which api do you use?
Armin
Christopher Lowe
Problem solved. For future reference if anybody runs
into this problem, the torque.delimiter in
build-torque.xml needs to be set to / since the
generated SQL uses the / to separate sql statements.
Perhaps this should be somewhere in documentation,
since it's definitely a change compared to the
Hi,
did you replace the repository_internal.xml or OJB's internal metadata
mapping (at least the mapping for HighLowSequence if you don't use
odmg-api)?
http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/guides/platforms.html#OJB+internal+tables
But I think the real problem is that you still have an old OJB
FWIW, DBCP seems to have some problems with Oracle (at least I had
some issues where the poolable connection waited forever for a new
connection). You might be better of using the datasource supplied by
the Oracle jdbc driver.
Tom
Folks,
Could you please advice an OJB solution for this SQL query:
SELECT
A.F,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM B INNER JOIN A ON A.F = B.F),
(SELECT AVG(C.FF) FROM C INNER JOIN A ON A.F = C.F),
(SELECT MAX(D.FFF) FROM D INNER JOIN A ON A.F = D.F)
FROM
A
The OJB
Thanks, Armin.
That was the problem (i.e. old ojb in my classpath).
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Movies: Check out the Latest Trailers, Premiere Photos and full
Actor Database.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
--- Milisic Aleksandar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks, Armin.
That was the problem (i.e. old ojb in my classpath).
Unfortunately, I have run into a different problem. I
am so bewildered by it that I started another small
project in one of the ojb-blank environments for
ojb1.04 to test
On 1/31/06, Milisic Aleksandar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, I have run into a different problem. I
am so bewildered by it that I started another small
project in one of the ojb-blank environments for
ojb1.04 to test this out and make sure it has nothing
to do with my environment.
Hi, guys!
I've recently upgraded to OJB1.04 or should I say *I
tried*. I've copied over the new files from
src/resources/* and src/schema/* from the ojb_blank
for 1.04 to my current project with ojb schemas and
resources.
The problem I am getting is the following:
- whenever I want to insert
Hi,
is fixed in SVN and will be included in upcoming 1.0.5 maintenance release.
regards,
Armin
Armin Waibel wrote:
Armin Waibel wrote:
A workaround will be to configure once LockManagerRemoteImpl by hand
before the first use of odmg-api:
LockManager lm =
Hi Phil,
DiCorpo, Phillip wrote:
I'm debugging an application that uses OJB 1.0.4 and when looking at the
ObjectReferenceDescriptor the lazy boolean data member is set to 'false'
even though the collection-descriptor this reference refers to has proxy
set to 'true'. Does this seem right or
Hy List,
We have an Database-Table with an default-Column (now()), and want to
save data in it. How can i configure OJB to insert Data in this table to
use the Database-Funktion to create the Data of this field?
The Table is created like this:
--- cut ---
CREATE TABLE import_log (
log_tst
Hi Robert,
Robert Einsle wrote:
Hy List,
We have an Database-Table with an default-Column (now()), and want to
save data in it. How can i configure OJB to insert Data in this table to
use the Database-Funktion to create the Data of this field?
The Table is created like this:
--- cut ---
In fact i'am able to persist my data using an array of bytes like that :
/**
* @ojb.field
*/
private byte[] primaryContent;
But my problem is that when i retrieve a lot of objects having this type of
attribute, i get an OutOfMemory error, and the blob , has i understand it
allow to
have a
I will be out of the office starting 01/27/2006 and will not return until
01/31/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using Tomcat 5.0.x which use DBCP, I set
accessToUnderlyingConnectionAllowed in server.xml but doesn't work:
ResourceParams name=people/LegacyDB
parameter
nameaccessToUnderlyingConnectionAllowed/name
valuetrue/value
/parameter
parameter
I wanted to know if when OJB generates the sql to get back requested
data, how does OJB handle the locking of records?
Hi folks,
after some serious profiling (and finding a bug in the Mustang b68
VM), I've added some additional cleanup calls to OJB (SVN of the
stable branch). Please give it a try to see whether that suffices.
However, you also need to do some work in your own webapp to ensure
proper cleanup. The
Hi Phil,
DiCorpo, Phillip wrote:
I'm having a problem removing objects in a 1:N relationship in OJB 1.0.4
using OMDG. Assume you have an object Role that can have one or more
Permission objects. If I lock just the Role object for WRITE, remove a
Permission object from this Role, and then
mmmh, yep I forget to say the following:
we use the client VM and not the server VM.
I am using JDK 1.5.0_04 on a gentoo linux, we also have deployments on Windows XP, Mac OSX, Solaris and Debian linux, with different JDK Versions also of JDK
1.4.2, however all quite up-to-date. No PermGen
I am using Java 1.5.0_01 and Tomcat 5.5.4 on my home machine and
1.5.0_05 / 5.5.9 on my remote developement server. I use jconsole on the
home machine to watch the leak. The remote has the problem too as
evidenced that it runs out of memory after about 15 reloads.
Danilo Tommasina wrote:
Hello,
I have a question regarding the handling of large data with ojb on the
Postgres platform.
- I think Blobs are not supported on this platform, is that true ?
- What is the best way to tell ojb to fetch the data from a field on each
access to the field ?
- Is that better to manage that
Hi,
I have a poblem using OJB 1.0.3 with Oracle9i, when I try to connect to
datasource defined with jndi in tomcat 5, if I define the datasource in
repository it works.
Ojb returns:
Class org.apache.ojb.broker.platforms.PlatformOracle9iImpl can not
access a member of class
On 1/25/06, Jean-Yves Sironneau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question regarding the handling of large data with ojb on the
Postgres platform.
- I think Blobs are not supported on this platform, is that true ?
- What is the best way to tell ojb to fetch the data from a field on each
On 1/25/06, Fabbri Michele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a poblem using OJB 1.0.3 with Oracle9i, when I try to connect to
datasource defined with jndi in tomcat 5, if I define the datasource in
repository it works.
I'm no Oracle expert, so I'm not sure whether it helps, but you could
try
Sorry I still did not update to 1.0.4 and was not able to test it out against
the memory leak.
We are using a patched version of OJB, patched by myself, but as long as I
remember it is almost the same code as in the 1.0.4 version.
what app- web-server are you using? version? note that in
Hi,
k jee wrote:
Is there a preferred way to initialized OJB when starting a web app?
Currently, on my system, OJB doesn't really load up until the first DB
related call.
Was wondering if there were some call I could make to an OJB
Factory class or whatever, to initialize OJB, other than
I use a servlet to load some global values. This accesses a couple of
tables and has the effect of initializing OJB, although that was not the
intention. The servlet is invoked when Tomcat starts up using
load-on-startup servlet attribute in web.xml
servlet
I am using Tomcat 5.5.4. I am almost certain it is OJB. I created a
stripped down context with the minimum classes needed to run OJB and
could pin the memory increase to touching anything that initiallized
OJB. I have also chased down other known offenders such as deregistering
the database
On 1/24/06, Rick Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using Tomcat 5.5.4. I am almost certain it is OJB. I created a
stripped down context with the minimum classes needed to run OJB and
could pin the memory increase to touching anything that initiallized
OJB. I have also chased down other known
hi again,
this is quite an old version of tomcat, we were not having trouble for sure
since tomcat 5.5.9, no idea how it was with earlier versions.
anyways, if this is not the problem, it could be still OJB that causes the leak. My patch fixed one situation but there may be other parts having
I am only using the PB API too.
Danilo Tommasina wrote:
hi again,
this is quite an old version of tomcat, we were not having trouble for
sure since tomcat 5.5.9, no idea how it was with earlier versions.
anyways, if this is not the problem, it could be still OJB that causes
the leak. My
Hello:
Sun JDK has some quite terrible memory leaks that are known
problems.Here are the pertinent Sun bug entries:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5033614 (fixed, but in 1.5,
not 1.4!)
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4957990 (unfixed)
Basically,
I'm having a problem removing objects in a 1:N relationship in OJB 1.0.4
using OMDG. Assume you have an object Role that can have one or more
Permission objects. If I lock just the Role object for WRITE, remove a
Permission object from this Role, and then commit the transaction I'll
get the
Thank you Rick, and Armin. That is really help full.
Thanks,
Rick Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a servlet to load some global values. This accesses a couple of
tables and has the effect of initializing OJB, although that was not the
intention. The servlet is invoked when
Thank you Armin,
Can I get a nightly build of 1.0.5 somehow?
Sergey
-Original Message-
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 12:31 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: exception in JDBC driver
Armin Waibel wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Manukyan, Sergey
Harri Kaimio wrote:
Hi,
I am having problems with OJB query criterias that include SQL
functions with several parameters. Here is an actual example that does
not work:
crit.addGreaterOrEqualThan( subdate(+dateField.getName()
+ , + accuracyField.getName() + ),
Hi Sergey,
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Thank you Armin,
Can I get a nightly build of 1.0.5 somehow?
Currently the easiest way is to check out latest version from SVN
OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch (we don't have a nightly build).
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/ojb/branches/OJB_1_0_RELEASE/
I upgraded to the new db-ojb-1.0.4 which has the method
PersistenceBrokerFactoryFactory.instance().shutdown();
This results in exception:
[ERROR] mffweb] - Exception sending context destroyed event to listener
instance of class org.mff.web.listener.CleanupListener
Hi Rick,
Rick Roman wrote:
I upgraded to the new db-ojb-1.0.4 which has the method
PersistenceBrokerFactoryFactory.instance().shutdown();
This results in exception:
[ERROR] mffweb] - Exception sending context destroyed event to listener
instance of class
Hi Armin. I don't have all the jars from the distribution lib directory
but I have all those with ojb in the name plus all the common- Should I
have them all?
I tried calling PersistenceBrokerFactory.shutdown() instead and got a
similar error.
Exception sending context destroyed event to
Rick Roman wrote:
Hi Armin. I don't have all the jars from the distribution lib directory
but I have all those with ojb in the name plus all the common- Should I
have them all?
I tried calling PersistenceBrokerFactory.shutdown() instead and got a
similar error.
Exception sending context
hi,
Seems like an class loader issue. Can you check if there are not older
ojb.jar in your classpath loaded before the ojb 1.0.4?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Rick Roman wrote:
I upgraded to the new db-ojb-1.0.4 which has the method
In switching to 1.0.4 an error parsing repository.xml has popped up. At
first I thought this was a problem with repository_internal but it turns
out that I get this error on the first class-descriptor encountered, no
matter what it is. If I switch back to 1.0.3, I don't see this problem.
Any
Rick Roman wrote:
In switching to 1.0.4 an error parsing repository.xml has popped up.
At first I thought this was a problem with repository_internal but it
turns out that I get this error on the first class-descriptor
encountered, no matter what it is. If I switch back to 1.0.3, I don't
see
Is there a preferred way to initialized OJB when starting a web app?
Currently, on my system, OJB doesn't really load up until the first DB
related call.
Was wondering if there were some call I could make to an OJB
Factory class or whatever, to initialize OJB, other than making a call
that
Thanks, that did the trick. I didn't read anything about updating the
repository.dtd or OJB.properties in the release announcement. Is there
some other place I should be looking for upgrade guidance?
Carlos Chávez wrote:
Rick Roman wrote:
In switching to 1.0.4 an error parsing
OK I'm really on version 1.0.4 now and all of these methods run without
error. Unfortunately, none of them have any effect on the memory leak.
PersistenceBroker broker =
PersistenceBrokerFactory.defaultPersistenceBroker();
broker.clearCache();
broker.close();
Rick Roman wrote:
Thanks, that did the trick. I didn't read anything about updating the
repository.dtd or OJB.properties in the release announcement. Is there
some other place I should be looking for upgrade guidance?
Hi Rick,
well, I only read the release-notes.txt.
Cheers,
Hi,
I am having problems with OJB query criterias that include SQL functions
with several parameters. Here is an actual example that does not work:
crit.addGreaterOrEqualThan( subdate(+dateField.getName()
+ , + accuracyField.getName() + ),
date );
Armin Waibel wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Hi Everybody,
We upgraded to 1.0.4 and using JT400-4.4 JDBC driver for AS400 data
source.
See now our JDBC driver throwing exceptions when OJB askes him for field
named OJB_CLAZZ, that the result set doesn't have, and it happens for
I had the same problem and fixed it by removing
field-descriptor
name=name
column=FIELDNAME
jdbc-type=VARCHAR
primarykey=true
/
from
class-descriptor
class=org.apache.ojb.broker.util.sequence.HighLowSequence
table=ojb_hl_seq
in
Folks,
I am using 1.0.4.
Could you please advice if there is a way to store an object of some
class without storing references although I defined in the descriptor of
the class to store references as well.
I am looking for a workaround that will enable me to do it in some
cases...
Something
Hi Sergey,
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Folks,
I am using 1.0.4.
Could you please advice if there is a way to store an object of some
class without storing references although I defined in the descriptor of
the class to store references as well.
I am looking for a workaround that will enable me
Hi Everybody,
We upgraded to 1.0.4 and using JT400-4.4 JDBC driver for AS400 data
source.
See now our JDBC driver throwing exceptions when OJB askes him for field
named OJB_CLAZZ, that the result set doesn't have, and it happens for
every row.
Is it possible to avoid OJB to check for this field
Thank you Armin.
-Original Message-
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:58 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: store object without references
Hi Sergey,
Manukyan, Sergey wrote:
Folks,
I am using 1.0.4.
Could you please advice if
Armin thank you for your reply,
I came to a solution proposed to another OJB mailing poster (Luis
Cruz) that works with me and suggested that I could invoke the
getUniqueValue() in the DomainObject super class... its ugly but it
works fine... and it happens to be a controlled ugliness.
I was now
Hello again,
Kindly forget my last e-mail I was looking to a old page of OJB that
was cached somewere... I think that the
http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/guides/advanced-technique.html#nested-objects
page wil serve my needs... if it doesn't I will let you know.
Regards,
Gonçalo Luiz
On 1/20/06,
1301 - 1400 of 13062 matches
Mail list logo
