Hi Armin,
ok, let's say the site specifies something related to that. But maybe it
will be more clearer if it's changed to something like this: "immature
API, use it on your own risk". In my opinion, "prototype" is a very soft
term for the problems that OJB-JDO API hides. Otherwise, probably the
George Mardale wrote:
In my opinion, very active is a little bit too much to say :-(... For
instance, I've asked 4 relative simple questions related to OJB-JDO
until now, but no one answered me. Each thread I start seems to be
doomed right from the start :-).
I'm sorry. I want help you but I can
Hi George,
George Mardale wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Regarding the thread, it is probably my fault. Even though the subject
of the email does not specify this, it seems that my emails were
constantly attached to existing threads, confusing all of us (I always
thought I started new threads). Thanks for po
arles.
-Original Message-
From: George Mardale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 December 2004 11:12
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: [OT] mailing list archive
Hi Liooil, Ramohan,
In my opinion, very active is a little bit too much to say :-(... For
instance, I've asked 4 relative si
ers List
Subject: Re: [OT] mailing list archive
Hi Liooil, Ramohan,
In my opinion, very active is a little bit too much to say :-(... For
instance, I've asked 4 relative simple questions related to OJB-JDO
until now, but no one answered me. Each thread I start seems to be
doomed right
Hi Thomas,
Regarding the thread, it is probably my fault. Even though the subject
of the email does not specify this, it seems that my emails were
constantly attached to existing threads, confusing all of us (I always
thought I started new threads). Thanks for pointing this out, anyway
But
> Hi,
>
> I believe the reason that you've not had any answers on questions relating
> to OJB-JDO plugin is that few people are using it.
Yup. Never tried it. I tend to stick to the PB api, and make a little use
of the ODMG API. I find the PB api to have much better performance. Yeah i
know it'
EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Liooil,
This is a very active project. There are a lot of messages in the archive.
Try searching for something specific.
Regards
Rao
From: "liooil " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed 15/12/2004 3:48 PM GMT+08:00
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OT] maili
George Mardale wrote:
In my opinion, very active is a little bit too much to say :-(... For
instance, I've asked 4 relative simple questions related to OJB-JDO
until now, but no one answered me. Each thread I start seems to be
doomed right from the start :-).
Mhmm, just checked the archive (nago
Hi Liooil,
This is a very active project. There are a lot of messages in the archive.
Try searching for something specific.
Regards
Rao
>
> From: "liooil " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed 15/12/2004 3:48 PM GMT+08:00
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:
Hello world,
Im'new to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i'm suprised how
low is the website containg the mailing list archive (i.e
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listName=ojb-user).
Same problem for http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.ojb.user
My requests often goes in timeout. It's
11 matches
Mail list logo
