Hi again,
> I believe it would be better to spend your time in supporting JDO; or
> some other standards you see fit.
When we started OJB JDO was not there. The only real object persistence API
available was ODMG. That's why we started with ODMG.
We can not simply drop ODMG support only because
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 07:29:06AM +0200, Thomas Mahler wrote:
> I don't understand that question.
I was wondering, if they couldn't maintain their website, then how could
they maintain the standards?
> We do support ODMG 3.0. Period.
The question is not about OJB support on ODMG, but about th
Hi Oki,
Oki DZ wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:30:44AM +0200, Mahler Thomas wrote:
The ODMG people did not tell us that they shut down their site...
So, what's the future of ODMG implementation on OJB?
I don't understand that question. We do support ODMG 3.0. Period.
ODMG announced a long tim
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:30:44AM +0200, Mahler Thomas wrote:
> The ODMG people did not tell us that they shut down their site...
So, what's the future of ODMG implementation on OJB?
TIA,
Oki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Hi Oki,
The ODMG people did not tell us that they shut down their site...
cheers,
Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: Oki DZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ODMG's site
>
>
> Hi,
>
&
Hi,
It seems the site has been down for days. (The machine is up, but no
pages supplied.)
What's up?
Oki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
