Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Donnerstag, 3. April 2003 16:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Default Cache - bug? design catostrophe? user error?
For me the problem appears without any reference/collection.
If you get a simple query to retrieve an object
|
|cc:
|
|Subject: RE: Def
lvain
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: jeudi, 3. avril 2003 16:20
À: OJB Users List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet: RE: Default Cache - bug? design catostrophe? user error?
Well, that kind of works. That is, it works great, unless you have
bid
|
|cc:
|
| Subject: RE: Default Cache - bug? design
;target'
is returned to the caller.
Ron Gallagher
Atlanta, GA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2003/04/02 Wed AM 11:44:27 EST
> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: Default Cache - bug? desi
|
|cc:
|
| Subject: Re: RE: Default Cache - bu
AM
To: OJB Users List
Cc: 'OJB Users List'
Subject: RE: Default Cache - bug? design catostrophe? user error?
It's not the transaction isolation that's a concern. I think the
PerBrokerCache has the same problem, which is that directly or indirectly,
the cache contains an inval
when it's pulled from the cache.
Ron Gallagher
Atlanta, GA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2003/04/02 Wed AM 08:11:15 EST
> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: "'OJB Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
|
|cc:
|
| S
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:28 PM
> To: OJB Users List
> Cc: OJB Users List
> Subject: RE: Default Cache - bug? design catostrophe? user error?
>
>
>
> Well, that DOES work, but in a multi-user environment, I
> would consider
> this fairly drastic.
|
|cc:
|
|
There are multiple Cache options that offer different scopes for
transactions, along with PersistenceBrokers. You should look at the API for
options on concurrency and transaction isolation with changing the
previously stated items in the OJB.properties.
-Jacob
| -Original Message-
| Fro
|
|cc:
|
|Subject: RE: Def
i agree this is a problem. the OTM is designed to solve this problem. Oleg, Raghu and
I are working on this (mostly Oleg :))
m
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Default Cache - bug? d
Could you flush the cache whenever you rollback a transaction?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Default Cache - bug? design catostrophe? user error?
Consider this: I'm uing ObjectCac
15 matches
Mail list logo
