Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-11-08 Thread Mike Perham
If you are leaking brokers, that doesn't solve the problem - it just works around it. We had the same problem with our Spring/JTA/OJB application and I discovered the problem was due to using Spring DAOs directly instead of going through the Spring transaction layer. On 11/8/06, Marwane <[EMAIL

RE: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-11-08 Thread Ferrer, Eric
read the instructions and make the appropriate changes. -Original Message- From: Marwane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:28 AM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server thx for your helpful and constructif repl

Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-11-08 Thread Marwane
: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 3:56 AM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server hi; The problem is resolved using : so it s strange the message gived by ojb tel us about the broker pool problem but the solution was the growing the connection pool !

RE: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-11-08 Thread Ferrer, Eric
Users List Subject: Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server hi; The problem is resolved using : so it s strange the message gived by ojb tel us about the broker pool problem but the solution was the growing the connection pool ! thx for all. On 10/27/06, Armin Waibel <[EM

Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-11-08 Thread Marwane
hi; The problem is resolved using : so it s strange the message gived by ojb tel us about the broker pool problem but the solution was the growing the connection pool ! thx for all. On 10/27/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marwane wrote: > thx. > > if i don't defin the conn

Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-10-27 Thread Armin Waibel
Marwane wrote: thx. if i don't defin the connection-pool clause in the repository.xml what is the default behavor about the connection managment in ojb ? I think by default 30 connections (docs says 21) managed by the pool (if you specify one of the "pooling" ConnectionFactory implementation

Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-10-27 Thread Marwane
thx. if i don't defin the connection-pool clause in the repository.xml what is the default behavor about the connection managment in ojb ? On 10/27/06, Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Marwane wrote: > thx for your reply. > so we use only the maxActive declared in OJB.properties.

Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-10-27 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi, Marwane wrote: thx for your reply. so we use only the maxActive declared in OJB.properties. in the repository.xml we dont use the connection-pool elements. Keep in mind that OJB use two different pools by default. An PB-pool (settings in OJB.properties file) and a connection-pool (settin

Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-10-27 Thread Marwane
thx for your reply. so we use only the maxActive declared in OJB.properties. in the repository.xml we dont use the connection-pool elements. regards. On 10/26/06, Dennis Bekkering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: when i have a quick look it seems to be about the broker pool and not the connection po

RE: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-10-26 Thread Ferrer, Eric
] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:11 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server when i have a quick look it seems to be about the broker pool and not the connection pool. Check your OJB.properties and set maxActive to the same value as maxActive of the

Re: Borrow broker from pool failed. in production server

2006-10-26 Thread Dennis Bekkering
when i have a quick look it seems to be about the broker pool and not the connection pool. Check your OJB.properties and set maxActive to the same value as maxActive of the connection pool settings in repository_database.xml. I am not sure about it but your problem happened to me once this way and