> On July 20, 2016, 6:29 p.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote:
> > Mostly style correction. Then I think it will be fine. (I'll check again)
Great. All requested changes done. Thanks
- Fahad
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125397/
---
(Updated July 21, 2016, 5:07 a.m.)
Review request for Okular and Albert A
> On July 20, 2016, 10 p.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote:
> > I think this can be dropped, as the frameworks branch is already in good
> > shape. What do you think?
If someone has duplicated (sort of) and gone beyond my efforts then well, then
"this" might indeed be dropped. I got side-tracked comp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125847/#review97676
---
As the port of the framework is not over, it cannot get new f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127628/#review97675
---
I think this can be dropped, as the frameworks branch is alre
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125397/#review97673
---
Mostly style correction. Then I think it will be fine. (I'll
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127541/#review97650
---
I don't want to be pushy, I know that time is scarce and peop
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126445/#review97648
---
This should be probably recommitted with the right author.
-
