https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389090
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #1 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389104
Bug ID: 389104
Summary: date property for PDF file is wrong
Product: okular
Version: unspecified
Platform: Debian stable
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389104
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Gelin ---
Created attachment 109929
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=109929&action=edit
Screencast of the bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389104
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373133
--- Comment #25 from Michael Weghorn ---
Note that the "Advanced" options tab has been reintroduced for the current
development version of Qt 5 [1]. Also, the problem with duplex options being
set at different places has been fixed [2], so I'd expect th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379260
--- Comment #6 from Michael Weghorn ---
A problem might be that the PPD does not use the standardized keyword "Duplex"
for duplex printing, but some vendor-specific one.
If you could provide the PPD file, this would help to narrow down the problem.
No
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368758
--- Comment #6 from Michael Weghorn ---
Note that the "Advanced" options tab has been reintroduced for the current
development version of Qt 5 [1]. Also, the problem with duplex [2] and color
[3] options being set at different places has been fixed, so
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #14 from Mich
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373863
--- Comment #6 from Michael Weghorn ---
Note also that the "Advanced" options tab has been reintroduced for the current
development version of Qt 5 [1]. Also, the problem with duplex options being
set at different places (which was present in Qt 4) has
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332443
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #3 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373133
--- Comment #26 from Nate Graham ---
Should we close this as RESOLVED UPSTREAM, then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368758
--- Comment #7 from Nate Graham ---
Should we close this as RESOLVED UPSTREAM, then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351409
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #3 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344645
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #11 from Mich
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334653
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #9 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375012
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #1 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373133
--- Comment #27 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #26)
> Should we close this as RESOLVED UPSTREAM, then?
I'd say yes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368758
--- Comment #8 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #7)
> Should we close this as RESOLVED UPSTREAM, then?
While printing to real devices should yield the expected result now, Okular
itself still does not take the color/greysc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373133
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368758
--- Comment #9 from Nate Graham ---
Great, thanks for the update. Would you like to change the title accordingly,
since printing to a real printer does work now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368758
--- Comment #10 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #9)
> Great, thanks for the update. Would you like to change the title
> accordingly, since printing to a real printer does work now?
That sounds like a good idea. What abou
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389104
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Gelin ---
This is the pdfinfo result. Creation date look's OK
$ pdfinfo Useful\ Macro\ Information\ -\ Andrew\ Pitonyak.pdf
Title: Useful Macro Information
Subject:For OpenOffice.org
Keywords: starbas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368758
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Printing with grayscale |Grayscale option ignored
|optio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363326
--- Comment #1 from Michael Weghorn ---
This is a bug in the "Advanced" tab of the Qt print dialog.
It has been fixed in the (reintroduced) version
in Qt 5's development version (and will be available with Qt 5.11), s.
following change: https://coderev
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333844
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322231
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #2 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336617
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
--
You are recei
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322231
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310837
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #3 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348024
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #1 from Micha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351849
--- Comment #7 from Michael Weghorn ---
@Dario: Does this problem still exist with a current Okular version?
If so: Can you please attach the PPD file of the printer in use (which should
be located at /etc/cups/ppd/.ppd)?
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356466
--- Comment #1 from Michael Weghorn ---
This might be due to the document being scaled down due to printer margins, s.
bug 336617.
What does the result look like when you print the file using "lpr" and adding
the "-o fit-to-page" option? Does it look t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333844
--- Comment #1 from wrinn...@web.de ---
This bug was reported by me 4 years ago.
The current version 0.26.1 still has the same issue.
There is no documented configuration file, nor configuration dialog that allows
to preset the printing parameters (A4 /
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333844
--- Comment #2 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to wrinnert from comment #1)
> This bug was reported by me 4 years ago.
> The current version 0.26.1 still has the same issue.
> There is no documented configuration file, nor configuration dialog that
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348024
--- Comment #2 from Walter Epley ---
Thanks, Michael for your trouble with this. I've long since - (I guess) not had
this problem. I'm still using newer versions of Mint, and have not been having
any problems.I think you can dismiss this - at least from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351409
Amnon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amye...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Amnon ---
@wegho
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389090
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389104
--- Comment #4 from Oliver Sander ---
Can you post an example file? Or does it happen for all files?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310837
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322231
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@kde.org
--- Comment #4 from Albert Ast
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348024
--- Comment #3 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Walter Epley from comment #2)
> [...] I've long since - (I guess) not
> had this problem. I'm still using newer versions of Mint, and have not been
> having any problems.I think you can dismiss this -
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348024
Walter Epley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348024
--- Comment #5 from Walter Epley ---
Thanks, Michael. I put a note in the report saying it could be closed. Let me
know if I can do something else to get it cleared out.Walt Epley
Walter F. Epley
415 9th St. SW
Albuquerque, NM 87102
Email: wfep...@ya
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351409
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348024
--- Comment #6 from Christoph Feck ---
Michael, I have just raised your bugzilla privileges. You should now be able to
edit any aspect of bugs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386408
Christoph Feck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387925
--- Comment #4 from Christoph Feck ---
To further investigate this issue, KDE developers need the information
requested in comment #1 and/or comment #2. If you can provide it, or need help
with finding that information, please add a comment.
--
You ar
47 matches
Mail list logo
