https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #142 from Simon simon...@gmail.com ---
Okay, thanks for the information! Will try to keep that in mind for the next
print :) Or not – saw that 4.8.4 just arrived! Cool.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #139 from Simon simon...@gmail.com ---
Thanks – I read most previous posts, and I also saw that it was fixed in 4.8;
At this place, thanks for the fix.
What I wondered, maybe not expressed that well, I've now upgraded to KDE 4.8
and my
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #140 from Albert Astals Cid tsdg...@terra.es ---
If it shows as 4.7.4 in apt it's because it's version 4.7.4, otherwise the
packagers have done a huge mistake.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #141 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at ---
You appear to have version 4.7.4 of Okular, but version 4.8.3 of kdelibs. (That
is possible, because kdelibs is backwards-compatible, so an older Okular on a
newer kdelibs should always
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Albert Astals Cid tsdg...@terra.es changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsdg...@terra.es
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #138 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at ---
I didn't complain, I just explained to the user WHY his Okular is still broken.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Simon simon...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon...@gmail.com
--- Comment #135
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #136 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at ---
As already written several times in the previous comments and indicated in the
fixed by field, this was fixed in 4.8.0.
The 4.7 branch is no longer maintained, and back when it was, the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Myriam Schweingruber myr...@kde.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e.ciso...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #131 from pierre 5933 gmail com 2011-11-13 15:02:34 ---
Thanks
in opensuse 11.4 kde I have tried to instal okular 4.7.3.21 with one click
instal , But there is a problem :
one depenciy is not deliver ( libqt4-x11...) I have accepted
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #132 from Mindaugas embar super lt 2011-11-13 15:15:49 ---
Pierre,
Maybe you want to add additional repository, like
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/KDE:/Release:/47/openSUSE_11.4/
to solve dependencies.
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #133 from pierre 5933 gmail com 2011-11-13 16:25:29 ---
I have installed the repository for kde 4.7 as you wrote , but it seems that
the dependebcy which is necessary is not delivered .
So I prefer to stay in my situation and wait
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #130 from Mindaugas embar super lt 2011-11-13 06:38:28 ---
openSUSE has already backported patch.
More details from https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625122 in
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/91021
If you have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
pierre.5...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pierre.5...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #125 from pierre 5933 gmail com 2011-11-09 11:41:27 ---
the problem I describe in comment 24 is for okular version 0.12 kde version 4.6
and also for version kde 4.7
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #126 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-11-09
14:10:41 ---
It will be fixed in 4.8.0.
The problem with backporting it is that it has to add functions to the
okularcore API, and AIUI the Okular maintainers don't want API
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #127 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-11-09 14:17:16
---
I answered already ages ago. No new API in stable releases.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #129 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-11-09
14:24:06 ---
That, or nag your distro to backport the fix, or switch to Fedora, which has
been shipping the fix for months.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #123 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-08-05
20:45:27 ---
I'd like this backported also, but I don't want to do this if the Okular
maintainers don't want it done, it's not my program.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Volker Helm helm.vol...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helm.vol...@gmx.de
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #121 from davidblunkett dav1dblunk3tt hotmail com 2011-08-04
22:34:41 ---
I'd like to see a backport to this - the problem is very annoying and it will
take some of us years to get to 4.8...
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #119 from Francesco Riosa francesco+kde pnpitalia it 2011-07-29
19:59:37 ---
APPLAUSES !1!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #105 from Francesco Riosa francesco+kde pnpitalia it 2011-07-27
15:28:11 ---
(In reply to comment #103)
Can we commit my patch? It has been in stable Fedora 15 updates since Monday,
and Fedora updates-testing for a few weeks before
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #106 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-07-27
19:21:20 ---
but at least you should fix the FIXMEs in your code.
As far as I can tell, the one function with a FIXME in it
(FilePrinter::printFiles, as opposed to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #107 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2011-07-27 20:44:28 ---
(In reply to comment #106)
but at least you should fix the FIXMEs in your code.
As far as I can tell, the one function with a FIXME in it
(FilePrinter::printFiles, as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #108 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-07-27
21:49:36 ---
This is just ridiculous. What's the point of keeping binary compatibility in a
library Okular is the only user of? What other excuses are you going to come up
with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #109 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2011-07-27 21:55:46 ---
(In reply to comment #108)
This is just ridiculous.
Just for you, really.
What's the point of keeping binary compatibility in a
library Okular is the only user of?
We try
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #110 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-07-27 22:14:49
---
Does the patch not break djvu, dvi and ps that use the same method you modified
but you are not passing/calculating the correct value? If you do not need to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #111 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-07-27
22:17:19 ---
My patch fixes all the backends to pass the correct value.
As for binary compatibility, do we need binary compatibility also for the
protected functions in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #112 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-07-27
22:19:21 ---
(Falk's original patch was incomplete and only touched the PDF backend. My
version which fixes all backends is at
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101513/ . I'm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #113 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-07-27 22:29:37
---
Protected methods are part of the API, so yes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #114 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2011-07-27 22:34:39 ---
(In reply to comment #111)
As for binary compatibility, do we need binary compatibility also for the
protected functions in FilePrinter or only for the public ones?
For the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #115 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-07-27
22:44:16 ---
I updated my review request to keep binary compatibility:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101513/
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #117 from Dominic Lyons domlyons gmail com 2011-07-27 23:47:12
---
Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||4.8.0
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #104 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-07-23 17:59:27
---
As i said already in this bug
If you think the patch is correct and are prepared to take the blame i
don't see why you should not commit it, but at least you should
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #103 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-07-22
20:01:12 ---
Can we commit my patch? It has been in stable Fedora 15 updates since Monday,
and Fedora updates-testing for a few weeks before that, with no complaints
whatsoever,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Niels Ole Salscheider niels_...@salscheider-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Mahendra Tallur ma...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@free.fr
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #100 from Falk faah gmx de 2011-06-06 19:01:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=60703)
-- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=60703)
Landscape DVI that fails to render and print
Taken from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #101 from Falk faah gmx de 2011-06-06 19:03:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=60704)
-- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=60704)
Landscape ps that is detected as portrait
Taken from:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #96 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-06-06 00:58:41
---
This is what I came up with:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101513/
I fixed the duplicate code, moving the orientation detection to the
Okular::Document class in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #97 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-06-06 02:14:34
---
I updated the review request with a fixed patch which actually compiles. :-)
A rediffed version of the above patch which applies against the
kdegraphics-4.6.3
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #98 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-06-06 02:43:00
---
I made some builds for Fedora users, which I want to push as updates soon.
A build for Fedora 15 (4.6.3) is now available for testing:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Laurent RINEAU laurent.rineau__...@normalesup.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
S. Burmeister sven.burmeis...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sven.burmeis...@gmx.net
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #93 from Falk faah gmx de 2011-05-08 10:38:28 ---
The orientation detection code isn't copy paste, because it works over a
different data structure. But the idea behind it is the same. It uses the page
height and width to decide if a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #94 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-05-08 10:40:08
---
I'm sure there must be some way to get this right, I'm going to have a look at
the code.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Mindaugas em...@super.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||em...@super.lt
--- Comment #75
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #76 from Karl Sinn ks budostore de 2011-05-07 11:51:50 ---
(In reply to comment #75)
Does this bug is in plans to fix for KDE 4.7? How can we force developers to
solve it?
I gave up on this one. Nobody will ever fix it. btw I don't
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #77 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-05-07 12:19:09
---
#76: We developers got fed up of the abuse happened in this and other various
bugs and moved to greener pastures
By the way if you don't use Okular anymore personally
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #78 from Geert Janssens info kobaltwit be 2011-05-07 12:39:13 ---
Thank you for your feedback. Given the history of comments on this bug I can
really understand the developer's attitude here, but at the same time I would
find it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #79 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez amrecio gmail com 2011-05-07
12:40:52 ---
No, please... It's bug 157284 all over again.
Out of curiosity, is there any other reason not to fix this bug apart from
punishing bad users (and thus all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #81 from Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez amrecio gmail com 2011-05-07
13:15:11 ---
Fair enough. However, I stand by what I said then: I think this does harm KDE's
reputation.
Anyway, I understand you so I'll leave it here. I hope working on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #82 from Karl Sinn ks budostore de 2011-05-07 15:40:31 ---
Hi,
Please don't misunderstand I'm not trying to attack anybody body here or to
destroy the benefit of anybody's work here. I'm simply frustrated of having
great software here
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #83 from Falk faah gmx de 2011-05-07 17:19:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=59734)
-- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=59734)
Patch for the PDF orientation problem
First of all I am not a Okular/KDE developer ... just a normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #84 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-05-07 17:24:31
---
That's certainly an improvement over the status quo and I think it should be
applied.
However, I suspect there might still be issues with mixed portrait/landscape
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #85 from Falk faah gmx de 2011-05-07 17:41:53 ---
I just checked it.
With the patch also mixed documents now print as one would expect.
Falk
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #86 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-05-07 18:27:40
---
@Kevin: If you think the patch is correct and are prepared to take the blame i
don't see why you should not commit it
@Falk: And you have checked all the other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #87 from Mindaugas embar super lt 2011-05-07 19:01:02 ---
As I am just user, I try to contribute as I can. I googled and found, that a
few years ago Evince, Acrobat reader, kpdf had similar problem. And the
solution was the same, as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #88 from Falk faah gmx de 2011-05-07 19:16:10 ---
@Albert
As I already stated, the patch fixes *only* PDFs all other formats maybe still
encounter the problem. But they should be easily patchable too because we now
know whats wrong.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #89 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2011-05-07 19:36:10
---
@Falk: Sorry, as I already stated I don't feel like working on this bug, i was
just giving some quick advice
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #90 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2011-05-07 22:31:37
---
So for starters, I think it's a bad idea to boycott this bug. Many users are
being annoyed by it and only a small vocal bunch of them complained on this
bug. That
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #91 from Falk faah gmx de 2011-05-07 23:31:24 ---
@Kevin
It was my first Idea was to reuse the ocular orientation detection code. But I
didn't found a way to pass the information from there to the actual printer
code without breaking
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #92 from Davor Cubranic cubranic acm org 2011-05-08 06:26:26 ---
Falk, to clarify: do you mean that the orientation detection code works
differently than what is already in Okular? You didn't just cut-and-paste,
because the types that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Reartes Guillermo rtgui...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rtgui...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Adam Meily meily.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meily.a...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #68 from Felix Möller felix derklecks de 2011-03-16 18:57:12 ---
i think bug #235438 is a duplicate of this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Felix Möller fe...@derklecks.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fe...@derklecks.de
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #71 from Christian Boltz kde-bugs cboltz de 2011-03-16 23:10:39
---
*** Bug 58 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #59 from Francesco Riosa francesco pnpitalia it 2011-02-22
13:37:52 ---
(In reply to comment #58)
I understand that your proposition is a workaround.
it is, and an ugly one
I will not use it because I would have to do it after every
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #60 from Francesco Riosa francesco pnpitalia it 2011-02-22
13:39:21 ---
my english suck, but that's a different bug
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #66 from Karl Sinn ks budostore de 2011-02-22 15:58:18 ---
@Francesco: can you answer this question?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Dominic Lyons domly...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||domly...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Degand Nicolas nicolas.deg...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Karl Sinn k...@budostore.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@budostore.de
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
p...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@free.fr
--- Comment #52 from p92 free
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
dmoyne daniel.mo...@neuf.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.mo...@neuf.fr
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #51 from Kevin Kofler kevin kofler chello at 2010-10-21 15:43:51
---
*** Bug 243953 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Bastian Holst bastianho...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bastianho...@gmx.de
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Alex Merry k...@randomguy3.me.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@randomguy3.me.uk
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Sebastian Morkisch se...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||se...@web.de
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #48 from Sebastian Morkisch semox web de 2010-09-18 08:46:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=51773)
-- (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=51773)
The document which will not be printed in Landscape
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Alvaro Manuel Recio Perez amre...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amre...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Marian Kyral mky...@email.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mky...@email.cz
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Felix Michel felix_mic...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix_mic...@gmx.ch
---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Darek Borkowski bork...@uci.agh.edu.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bork...@uci.agh.edu.pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kevin.kof...@chello.at
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #37 from Pino Toscano pino kde org 2010-02-22 12:14:29 ---
(In reply to comment #35)
(In reply to comment #34)
There's a huge difference between be entitled to their opinion and
repeating
the same concept over and over. As said
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #38 from Till Maas opensource till name 2010-02-22 12:48:15 ---
(In reply to comment #37)
Why don't you read what I said above, like comment #27? There is *no* KDE
printing system in KDE 4.
Now, either we want or not, we rely on Qt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #40 from Ozan Çağlayan ozan pardus org tr 2010-02-22 19:58:44 ---
No, a comment saying printing is still not fixed, you suck does not try to
point that out, it's a personal attack against the developers, and with a very
weird
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #41 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2010-02-22 20:04:46
---
Well, maybe you knew that it was broken, but I didn't, and I was not sure you
did know it was, hence the message.
So you read the description and 28 comments of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #42 from Francesco Riosa francesco pnpitalia it 2010-02-22
21:06:26 ---
I'm using the following workaround from 2009-05-05 #c5, it work for me, could
some developer spread the light and write here _where_ it is un-appropriate?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #29 from Éric Brunet eric brunet lps ens fr 2010-02-21 17:43:56
---
Bug is still present in KDE 4.4.0
This is so incredibly painful ! Could the severity of this be raised ? KDE
4.4.0, 6 months in the making, is not able to print
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #30 from Ozan Çağlayan ozan pardus org tr 2010-02-21 22:39:31 ---
KDE 3 has a printing system, KDE 4 doesn't. Spot the difference.
That's the key. KDE4 doesn't have a kdeprint like subsytem. What a functional
regression from KDE3! I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
--- Comment #31 from Albert Astals Cid tsdgeos terra es 2010-02-21 22:52:44
---
#29 and #30, if you are not going to give coding time nor money to fix the
issue you should nor really comment because your comments add exactly *zero*
value to the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Dmitry dmitry.ashka...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitry.ashka...@gmail.com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Johan Thelm j...@home.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@home.se
--
Configure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181290
Werner Meyer mey@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mey@web.de
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
