Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 01/10/15 11:58, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 01 2015 11:50:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: In that case, wouldn't setting tcp_tstamp_always on OI to '1' be better in this case (or would OI not honour that setting correctly)? >>> >>> It wouldn't work. From what I can tell,

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 01/10/15 14:23, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 01 2015 13:49:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: >> Le 01/10/15 11:58, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : >>> On Thu, Oct 01 2015 11:50:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: >> In that case, wouldn't setting tcp_tstamp_always on OI to '1' be better >>

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Thu, Oct 01 2015 13:49:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > Le 01/10/15 11:58, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : > > On Thu, Oct 01 2015 11:50:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > In that case, wouldn't setting tcp_tstamp_always on OI to '1' be better > in > this case (or would OI not honour that

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Thu, Oct 01 2015 14:29:32 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > >> Actually I still notice some problems.. This morning in the direction OI > >> => omnios > >> things seemed okay. > >> Now, omnios => OI I just now experienced the hang again, and it is > >> repeatable. > >> > >> Could it be that your

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 30/09/15 10:02, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : On Wed, Sep 30 2015 09:56:47 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: To be clear, it's not implementing RFC 1323 (and not even *not* implementing 7323) that causes the issue. 1323 actually didn't specify what to do with non-timestamped segments on a

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Thu, Oct 01 2015 11:50:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > >>In that case, wouldn't setting tcp_tstamp_always on OI to '1' be better in > >>this case (or would OI not honour that setting correctly)? > > > >It wouldn't work. From what I can tell, those ndd settings only affect > >the SYN segments

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Wed, Sep 30 2015 09:56:47 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > >To be clear, it's not implementing RFC 1323 (and not even *not* > >implementing 7323) that causes the issue. 1323 actually didn't specify > >what to do with non-timestamped segments on a timestamp-negotiated > >connection, and illumos

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 29/09/15 12:35, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : On Tue, Sep 29 2015 12:19:09 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: Since I'm not having any issues with netbsd (6.1), which seemingly is still at rfc1323 richard@omnis:/home/richard$ ssh netbsd.org /sbin/sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1323 net.inet.tcp.rfc1323 = 1

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Tue, Sep 29 2015 12:19:09 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > Since I'm not having any issues with netbsd (6.1), which seemingly is still > at rfc1323 > >richard@omnis:/home/richard$ ssh netbsd.org /sbin/sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1323 > >net.inet.tcp.rfc1323 = 1 > > I'd like to do some additional tests

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 28/09/15 17:40, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : It just occurred to me that if timestamp options don't get negotiated at all on the connection, both peers should be fine with this injection and continue to function. So as a workaround you could try disabling timestamps on the oi_151a9 box. I see

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Mon, Sep 28 2015 16:20:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > Le 28/09/15 15:46, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : > > On Mon, Sep 28 2015 08:21:46 -0400, Dan McDonald wrote: > >> > >>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > >>> > >>> If 5850 is indeed the problem, you need to

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 28/09/15 15:46, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 28 2015 08:21:46 -0400, Dan McDonald wrote: >> >>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: >>> >>> If 5850 is indeed the problem, you need to report this to the >>> illumos developers list, including a

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Mon, Sep 28 2015 16:20:03 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > Le 28/09/15 15:46, Lauri Tirkkonen a écrit : > > On Mon, Sep 28 2015 08:21:46 -0400, Dan McDonald wrote: > >> > >>> On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > >>> > >>> If 5850 is indeed the problem, you need to

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Thu, Sep 10 2015 11:28:12 +0200, Richard PALO wrote: > Le 08/09/15 14:12, Dan McDonald a écrit : > > > >>On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:32 AM, Richard PALO > >> wrote: > >> > >>before the traffic seemingly when things go sour... I notice a Window >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

If 5850 is indeed the problem, you need to report this to the illumos developers list, including a deterministic way of reproducing it. Funny though, the fix was brought forth because of specific middlebox behavior. It is POSSIBLE your middlebox is behaving differently than the bug-filer's

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

> On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > If 5850 is indeed the problem, you need to report this to the illumos > developers list, including a deterministic way of reproducing it. I see you filed bug 6264, which is a good first step. Please make sure you

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 28/09/15 14:21, Dan McDonald a écrit : > >> On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: >> >> If 5850 is indeed the problem, you need to report this to the illumos >> developers list, including a deterministic way of reproducing it. > > I see you filed bug 6264,

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Mon, Sep 28 2015 08:21:46 -0400, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:15 AM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > > If 5850 is indeed the problem, you need to report this to the > > illumos developers list, including a deterministic way of > > reproducing it. > > I see

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 26/09/15 17:33, Richard PALO a écrit : > Le 08/09/15 06:32, Richard PALO a écrit : >> Thought I would try snoop with port 22. >> >> From omnios, in one window I issued: >>> pfexec snoop -rv -d e1000g0 port 22 |& tee snoop.out >> >> From another I connected to the OI machine and did nothing

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 08/09/15 06:32, Richard PALO a écrit : > Thought I would try snoop with port 22. > > From omnios, in one window I issued: >> pfexec snoop -rv -d e1000g0 port 22 |& tee snoop.out > > From another I connected to the OI machine and did nothing further (as it > hangs in that direction too): >>

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 08/09/15 14:12, Dan McDonald a écrit : On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:32 AM, Richard PALO wrote: before the traffic seemingly when things go sour... I notice a Window changed to 1024?? Which side is advertising the window change again? And which side is running -gate from

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 08/09/15 14:12, Dan McDonald a écrit : On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:32 AM, Richard PALO wrote: before the traffic seemingly when things go sour... I notice a Window changed to 1024?? Which side is advertising the window change again? And

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 24/08/15 19:14, Eric Sproul a écrit : On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Richard PALO richard-s783fymb3ccdnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org wrote: notice inbound invalids and nomatches both ways... are they a concern? I have no idea. I might try adding an unconditional pass rule for the

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

Le 24/08/15 18:05, Eric Sproul a écrit : What you describe sounds network-related, perhaps just a coincidence that it happened recently. However, it also sounds like the behavior changes depending on whether you use an older BE or a newer one, so that makes it seem *less* likely that it is an

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Richard PALO rich...@netbsd.org wrote: The machines do not belong to the same subnet. They are physically remote and the omnios machine is behind a router with port forwarding. The OI machine *is* multihomed, though. What strikes me most is that previous

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] strangeness ssh into omnios from oi_151a9

I just tried this reproduction on my OmniOS box: 1.) ssh to OI 151a9. 2.) ssh from 151a9 to bloody 3.) cat $illumos-gate/usr/src/uts/common/inet/ip/ip.c (a large file) No breakage. 4.) git log -p ip.c -- it uses less -M by default, so that stopped waiting for input. 5.) git log -p ip.c |