Hello,
The PNF software upgrade meeting is moved to Wednesday ONLY
for this week due to holiday. We will use the following zoom bridge.
#usecase CM (UTC)
https://zoom.us/j/725247460
US east time zone 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM
Have a nice day
Zu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links:
Hello, Yaoguang
The following are the proposed discussion items in the PNF
upgrade meeting this week. Please let me know if you have any comments.
* SO API format discussion - SO-2071 (Yaoguang)
* SO Decision layer implementation proposed (Henry)
* SO to APPC cli
Do we have change management meeting today?
Have a nice day
Zu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13947): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13947
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/28277071/21656
Group Owne
Hello, Ben
Thanks for updating the text. A few more comments below in red.
By the way, Steven has some additional comments on the Jira
ticket page, which you may want to take into consideration as well.
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
From: Cheung, Ben (Nokia - US
Thanks Ben for updating the PNF requirements. Please see my comments inline
below.
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
PNP-1330 [PNF] - The PNF Vendor MUST provide software Version(s) to be
supported by PNF for SDC Design Studio PNF Model. This is set in the PNF Model
property software_versions.
[Zu
Hello, Ben
The following is the response from Steven Wright, which I
totally agree with him. But if you would like to change the ONAP community
decision, may be you should call in the VNGRQTS meeting tomorrow at 8am (New
York time zone).
“Zu Qiang, Ben,
The rest of the VNFRQTS
+1
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of
WRIGHT, STEVEN A
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 12:41 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] #vnfrqts PNP text > SHOULD vs SHALL
Zu Qiang, Ben,
The rest of the VNFRQTS are defined using
that requirement by including “SHALL” as normative text in Casablanca?”
(Personally, I don’t think we should.)
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
From: Cheung, Ben (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 12:58 PM
To: Zu Qiang ; WRIGHT, STEVEN A
Cc: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'
that ONAP is going to use the same normative text which is
used in another RAN standardization origination. As I recommended early, please
read RFC2119.
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
From: Cheung, Ben (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 9:13 AM
To: Zu Qiang ; WRIGHT, STEVEN A
Cc
read RFC2119.
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
From: Cheung, Ben (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 7:54 AM
To: Zu Qiang ; WRIGHT, STEVEN A
Cc: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' ; Hillis, Marge
(Nokia - US)
Subject: RE: #vnfrqts PNP text > SHOULD vs SHALL
All,
REQU
including "SHALL" as normative text in
Casablanca?
Have a nice day
Zu Qiang
From: Cheung, Ben (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 1:42 PM
To: Zu Qiang ; WRIGHT, STEVEN A ;
'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org'
Subject: RE: #vnfrqts PNP text
Qiang Zu,
* Is
uld keep the normative text only and remove all the explanation
text in the notes. If anyone would like to have a better understanding on how
the 5G PnP works, he/she should read the 5G PnP wiki page.
I'll come back with some detail rewording proposals if we can have an agreement
on the gener
12 matches
Mail list logo
