Re: [onap-discuss] Supporting IETF Interface YANG model based on RFC8343?

The obsolescence/upgrade of upstream specifications seems like a   problem we need a generic solution for. These may not be major feature upgrades, but we  need to maintain parity with the larger industry.  Even if the RFC upgrade is not supported in this release, I would expect we would need to

Re: [onap-discuss] Supporting IETF Interface YANG model based on RFC8343?

[sdnc/northbound.git] / generic-resource-api / model

[onap-discuss] Supporting IETF Interface YANG model based on RFC8343?

Hi Brian I am also looking at a JIRA issue about whether we should support RFC8343 (YANG data model for interface management) as it obsoletes RFC7223. I cannot find the interface YANG model used by SDNC. Is it based on RFC7223 or RFC8343? The difference is that the "/interfaces-state" subtree