I will echo a bit of what Ed and Bob stated.
We mostly use the IRC bot to capture the minutes.
I will soon create a page under "Getting Involved" called "Community
Meetings".
I will post the calendar there as well as the information for connecting to
the various community meetings and a link to
Dear ONAP TSC,
The VNF SDK team would like to formally propose the VNF SDK project:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VNF+SDK.
Note that we have adjusted the scope of this project and split the original
proposal into three parts. VNF SDK (this project) is focused on developing
tools for VNF
Team,
Just to clarify, this is a one-time meeting proposal. There were limited slots
next week, and this is the best I could find. Next week, we will discuss
recurring meeting times for future meetings.
Chris
From: Lingli Deng [mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017
Hui,
Thanks for the clarification.
Sorry for the confusion.
Lingli
From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: 2017年5月27日 8:12
To: Lingli Deng ; Christopher Donley (Chris)
; onap-tsc@lists.onap.org;
Lingli,
It doesn’t conflict with modeling (PDT 6-7AM), architecture will be PDT 8-9AM
Best regards,
DENG Hui
From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lingli Deng
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 7:55 AM
To: Christopher Donley (Chris);
Makes sense but you may still follow open-o model of ramping up labs. Given
size and interest of ONAP it may take a little time to align across the
community.
Best
John
John Zannos
> On May 26, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Lingli Deng wrote:
>
> To clarify, I fully agree
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the arrangements.
I am interested to join but found a conflict with modeling weekly calls.
Will the suggested time slot be used for subsequent routine calls or is it
only a one-time suggestion?
Since I expect several people including myself to be regularly attending
To clarify, I fully agree to the considerations on having different types of
physical/virtual/CICI labs. However, not having a strong opinion on whether or
not to consolidate the different teams.
OPEN-O operated with one lab with Release 1 and added another in Release 2, we
had separate
Hello OpenDaylight TSC Members.
As you all know we have many initial project proposals to review, reconcile
and (hopefully) approve over the next couple of weeks.
As Mazin has stated earlier, we will be doing this in a couple of different
steps:
First, we will break into teams focused on
Dear TSC, From the above discussions we learned the opinions of the ONAP members on Open Lab. As Xiaojun mentioned, China Telecom would like to provide a physical lab for ONAP. Actually, in last year, China Telecom has already established a Physical Lab for Open-O mercury release, and finished
Nermin, the day and time aren't able to be changed--these are the days when
OPNFV was able to allocate extra rooms for other events.
Your help in driving awareness of the CFP and encouraging submissions would
be great!
Thanks, Lisa
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Nermin Mohamed
All,
I think it is better to have the ONAP summit last day similar w=to what we did
in ONS and we then have Marketing, TSC and GB meetings and social events.
Some people may be traveling on Sunday and may miss the first day of OPNFV
summit. In order to have most people attend, we should move
Right…the IRC bot process we use in OPNFV likewise records all minutes using
webchat IRC commands into a specific directory for each channel created for a
project. When we #endmeeting, I get the links to my saved minutes files and can
save them under the meetings directory of my project wiki
Thank you to Alla, I have now posted a framework for the use case subcommittee
on the wiki page.
Your feedback is appreciated. I will advise the TSC next week to vote to
formally establish this subcommittee.
We will then do self-nomination for a lead.
Mazin
In many other communities, when a project get's approved it creates its own
wiki page which has sub pages for things like its meetings, meeting
minutes, etc. Keeping IRC meeting minutes is a great practice, and highly
recommended. Do do that you can create and onap-* IRC channel and open a
Yes and we should keep that organized. If we post them on random wiki pages
nobody will find them… .
Seems Casey has a plan.
Casey,
do you think you can put a concrete proposal out with a process on how people
can get there meetings/notes/recordings listed and organized?
Thx
Oliver
On May
+1
In our Multi-Cloud project, we have discussed the similar issue, in a slightly
different context. We typically record all meetings, and also have a meeting
note. We are wondering if we should post these recording and meeting notes, and
if so, where?
Danny
From:
Agreed. Are we planning for the wiki to be central hub of information or
github?
John Zannos
> On May 26, 2017, at 8:35 AM, Ed Warnicke wrote:
>
> +1k
>
> I would strongly suggest we adopt the community norm that its totally cool
> for teams to start calls/IRC channels
+1k
I would strongly suggest we adopt the community norm that its totally cool
for teams to start calls/IRC channels but they *really* need to list them
in a central index so people can find them. Aggressive Openness :)
Ed
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:03 AM, SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) <
19 matches
Mail list logo