[onap-tsc] Updated Event: TSC (updated Nov. 2, 2018) #cal-invite

BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//Groups.io Inc//ONAP Calendar//EN METHOD:PUBLISH CALSCALE:GREGORIAN BEGIN:VEVENT UID:calendar.10...@lists.onap.org DTSTAMP:20181106T054714Z ORGANIZER;CN=onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Group:mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org DTSTART:20181108T14Z DTEND:20181108T153000Z

[onap-tsc] Reminder// [VNFSDK] VNFSDK New Weekly Meeting time

发件人: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org] 代表 gaoweitao 发送时间: 2018年11月2日 17:26 收件人: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; onap-disc...@lists.onap.org 抄送: moshe...@amdocs.com 主题: [onap-discuss] [VNFSDK] VNFSDK New Weekly Meeting time Hi VNFSDK folks, Per Moshe

Re: [onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac

Hi Satyendra, Welcome in board. The specific document you are referring can be found at https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4016?p=,,,20,0,0,0::Created,,%23tac,20,2,0,27630566 FYI, any email exchanged within the LF mailing list can be found at https://lists.onap.org .We have a lot of Arch

Re: [onap-tsc] Face to Face events in 2019

Good evening Phil, Thank you for sharing the 2019 “events” timeline proposal. These dates seem to be aligned with the ONAP Release plan if we decide to maintain the same ONAP Major Release cadence. It should not prevent us from organizing extra meetings if the ONAP Community would like to tackl

Re: [onap-tsc] Dublin milestones...

Good evening Alex, This is a draft proposal. Gildas is looking for feedback. Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alex Vul Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 10:53 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] Dublin milestones...

[onap-tsc] Dublin milestones...

Hi, Can the TSC confirm that the Dublin release milestones linked below are the right ones? https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+Planning Thanks in advance, Alex Vul Intel Corporation -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4030):

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP-ARCHCOM] [ONAP-MODCOM] Dublin F2F summary

Hi Catherine, Sure, that would be fine. BR, Steve From: Lefevre, Catherine Sent: Monday 5 November 2018 14:51 To: Stephen Terrill ; onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-modeling...@lists.onap.org Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: RE: [ONAP-ARCHCOM] [ONAP-MODCOM] Dublin F2F summary Thank you Step

Re: [onap-tsc] CALL FOR NOMINATIONS: ONAP TSC SPECIAL ELECTION - Chaker Al-Hakim

Hi everyone, Please accept this email as my self-nomination to serve as a member on the ONAP TSC. I have been an active member of the ONAP community since its inception and have contributed significantly in many areas including Architecture, Service Orchestration, Controllers Data Modeling a

Re: [onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac - Session 1 (NAR)

Hi Catherine, Is this meeting still on? Regards, Chaker -Original Appointment- From: Lefevre, Catherine [mailto:catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 7:35 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #

Re: [onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac

Unfortunately I dont think TF is bring in new LFN companies but I could be wrong. LFN is pretty broad right now already. Brian From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 8:55 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org; Casey Cain Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Revie

Re: [onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac

Hi, As far as I understand, membership (and the fees our companies psy) is in LFN, therefore if one more project becomes part of LFN, it would actually mean spreading the same amount of money amongst more projects i.e. each project gets less. This, of course, may not be TRUE in case this new p

Re: [onap-tsc] [ONAP-ARCHCOM] [ONAP-MODCOM] Dublin F2F summary

Thank you Stephen for sharing the information. It would be great to have a readout concerning the F2F event at TSC level. Can we target November 15th ? I have also created a page on the ONAP wiki to capture the consolidated Dublin Release requirements https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Dublin+Relea

Re: [onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac

Thanks Steve for the comments. As for my comments regarding the budget they were my personal conclusion. it would be useful to know how the budget would be handled, not only for these specific project, but for any/all future projects. Regards, Chaker From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:on

[onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac - Session 2 (APAC/EMEA)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Romance Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T0200

[onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac - Session 1 (NAR)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Romance Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T0200

Re: [onap-tsc] Review Tungsten Fabric proposal (formely OpenContrail) #tac

Good morning Chaker, Srini, Stephen and the other ONAP TSC members (and proxies), My apologies for the delayed response. I confirm that the TAC request was only to review the Tungsten Fabric Project Data proposal. https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/lfn-process-rtd-verify