On 16.08.2011 01:31, eric b wrote:
Hi,
Doing some performance tests, I just figured out the types.rdb file
is a binary file, just provided in the sources.
Can someone explain me :
- why a binary blob is directly provided in OpenOffice.org sources ?
( OOO320_m1x for instance, but
On 15.08.2011 23:48, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 15.08.2011 18:46, Rob Weir wrote:
We've been discussing for two months now how to get Hg over to SVN.
There have been several suggestions for how the CWS's and complete
revision history could be migrated over, but little progress has been
made.
Hi,
Le 14 août 11 à 12:24, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
On 14/08/2011 eric b wrote:
Le 13 août 11 à 17:44, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
PLIO, the association corresponding to the Italian Native-Lang
Project, has been a registered charity in Italy since 2005 and
receives contributions from Italian
Hi Mathias,
Le 16 août 11 à 08:34, Mathias Bauer a écrit :
On 16.08.2011 01:31, eric b wrote:
Hi,
Doing some performance tests, I just figured out the types.rdb
file is a binary file, just provided in the sources.
Can someone explain me :
- why a binary blob is directly provided in
On 16.08.2011 09:27, eric b wrote:
Does this method to allow OpenOffice.org growing only ? If we
systematicaly compare to an existing but fixed blob, we have no way
to remove useless/no longer needed services ? (but maybe I
misunderstood )
We can do with that reference file whatever
Hi Eric,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 08:47:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people). As you understood, my concern is
EducOO.it : Marina Latini does a fantastic work and helps us a lot.
now this strikes me.
The German association
Hi Florian,
Le 16 août 11 à 11:42, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hi Eric,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 08:47:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people). As you understood, my concern is
EducOO.it : Marina Latini does a fantastic work and
Hi Eric,
Von: eric b
Gesendet: 16.08.11 12:10 Uhr
Please don't get me wrong : it is not used, because _nobody_
maintains it, not because we do not want to maintain it :-)
And at the end, we have several possibilities: either it is
unmaintained intentionaly, or people ignore we exist.
Hi Dennis,
On Monday, 2011-08-15 13:07:19 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
With regard to the migration of issues, are we going to manage to
preserve the identity of those who posted and commented on issues?
I recommend yes, preserve the *@ooo accounts and their mail forwarding
at least at
Hi Eric,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 12:10:
Please don't get me wrong : it is not used, because _nobody_ maintains
it, not because we do not want to maintain it :-)
And at the end, we have several possibilities: either it is
unmaintained intentionaly, or people ignore we exist. Did you invite
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:32:19 -0400:
Is anyone planning on actually reviewing the dump file, e.g., loading
it into a local repository, checking it out and looking at the
resulting source tree?
First, need to review history too, not just a checkout of HEAD.
Second, it would
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:32:19 -0400:
Is anyone planning on actually reviewing the dump file, e.g., loading
it into a local repository, checking it out and looking at the
resulting source tree?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:32:19 -0400:
Is anyone planning on actually reviewing the dump file, e.g., loading
it into a local
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Ingrid von der Mehden
ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
Am 15.08.2011 18:46, schrieb Rob Weir:
[...]
ooo/trunk/core --- all the OOO340 stuff
ooo/trunk/l10n -- all the language stuff
Actually I would suggest to name the directory 'main' instead of 'core'.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
On 16.08.2011 14:32, Rob Weir wrote:
I've uploaded the dump file. There are no abstract, non-specific
risks there. There may be errors. But those would be the kind of
errors that could be described in detail. And
eric wrote:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people).
nonsense. educoo.de points to your servers, you're free to post
whatever content you desire there (yes, I've read Florian's and your
answer to this).
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
Hi Thorsten,
Le 16 août 11 à 16:24, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
eric wrote:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people).
nonsense. educoo.de points to your servers, you're free to post
whatever content you desire there (yes, I've read
Hi again;
- Original Message -
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
We're only checking in the tip of the trunk into SVN. The history is
going to Apache-Extras, and remaining in Hg. I don't see how you
would use the history to verify a SVN
Hi,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 16:38:
And you are right about educoo.de. Please accept my excuses for the
wrong statement.
c'est la vie. :-) Nevermind. Let's rather look to get content on that
page, that helps everyone.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering
On Aug 16, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 08/13/2011 09:58 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi -
I have modified the template process.
For html files the
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:53:12 -0400:
I'm not certain whether I have permissions to load the dump file
directly, without going through Apache Infra. I'd like to avoid doing
this as a giant commit of 76K files because of difficulty of dealing
with partial failures. I also
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ingrid von der Mehden
ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
Am 16.08.2011 16:21, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Ingrid von der Mehden
ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
Am 15.08.2011 18:46, schrieb Rob Weir:
[...]
ooo/trunk/core --- all the
Am 16.08.2011 19:04, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ingrid von der Mehden
ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
Am 16.08.2011 16:21, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Ingrid von der Mehden
ingrid...@gmx-topmail.dewrote:
Am 15.08.2011 18:46, schrieb Rob
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:58 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:49 -0400, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:42 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:18 -0700,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 14:45 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:58 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:49 -0400, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:42 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:39 AM, drew wrote:
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
While hosting non-OSS plugins is probably out,
I don't see why we can't host OSS ones here
especially if we don't change the dns from
openoffice.org to apache.org.
We
It's custom php code located somewhere in the infra
repo. If you ask on infrastructure@ someone can provide
you specifics and access if you'd like.
From: Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:02 PM
On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:14 PM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
While hosting non-OSS plugins is probably out,
I don't see why we can't host
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 13:27 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:14 PM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
While hosting
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:14 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
It just needs to be cleared by legal/board.
Is it just me, or has anyone else missed a number of important branding,
technology, and hosting questions in this thread, now that it's gone
down about 32 levels and changed subjects a few times?
Maybe I'm just tired tonight, but there are nuggets in here that are far
more important than
On Aug 16, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:26 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:36 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:14 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 16:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Aug
32 matches
Mail list logo
