On 11/10/11 7:56 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Am 10.11.2011 16:52, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
ok, drop counterproductive but i still don't understand why you have
checked in it at all. The update if necessary could have been done at a
later time as well.
You seem to misunderstand what Pedro did.
b) Apache OpenOffice
+1
AFAIK in the old project the use of the plain OpenOffice was not
possible due to trademark concerns. If this gets resolved by using the
full Apache OpenOffice name then I'd prefer this. Else if this was not
possible because some trademark concerns remain then Apache
Hi,
Thanks Rob for your feedback - it is welcome.
Anything else?
Is somebody else from our community attending?
Thanks and best regards, Oliver.
On 09.11.2011 13:49, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to let
Hi,
As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your vote. If none of
them get more than 50% of the binding votes, we will start a ballot for the
top two contenders.
a) Apache OpenOffice.org
+1
Kind regards, Joost
Le mer. 09 nov. 2011 19:47:22 CET, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com a
écrit :
As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your vote. If none of
them get more than 50% of the binding votes, we will start a ballot for the
top two contenders.
a) Apache OpenOffice.org
+1.
We should not
On 10 November 2011 14:53, Louis Suárez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm. I think a list is good… but.
...
I can't give an accurate number right now, as the Web page is off. But
I'd say toward the end about 10 or so; but that was using the Web
interface, which evaded the spam effect.
b) Apache OpenOffice
＋1
Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote on 11/10/2011 11:47:22 AM:
From: Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org,
Date: 11/10/2011 11:47 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Trademark and Brand
As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your
There seems to be some requiring questions in this ballot. We had a
length discussion on these topics on the ooo-marketing list, but not
everyone followed that discussions.
Some things to keep in mind:
1) This is a vote for what name the project prefers. Whatever choice
we decide on will still
a) Apache OpenOffice.org
Best Regards,
Lily Zhao（赵遐）
QE Lead, Symphony
Email:zhao...@cn.ibm.com
Tel: 8610-82452706 Tieline: 9052706
IBM China Software Development Lab
*If you are not part of solution, you are part of problem*
b) Apache OpenOffice
+1
On 10.11.2011 04:47, Donald Harbison wrote:
As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your vote. If none of
them get more than 50% of the binding votes, we will start a ballot for the
top two contenders.
a) Apache OpenOffice.org
b) Apache OpenOffice
c) Apache
Donald Harbison wrote:
a) Apache OpenOffice.org
b) Apache OpenOffice
c) Apache Open Office
d) Apache Office
+1 for a) Apache OpenOffice.org as product name.
Andrea
b) Apache OpenOffice
On 10.11.2011 04:47, Donald Harbison wrote:
As promised, here's the ballot. Choose one, cast your vote. If none of
them get more than 50% of the binding votes, we will start a ballot for the
top two contenders.
a) Apache OpenOffice.org
b) Apache OpenOffice
c) Apache Open
No need to apologize,
OOo (or AOO? ,looks like a tie from here), is a huge monster
and it's difficult to keep up with all the changes that
are in progress !
best regards,
Pedro.
--- On Fri, 11/11/11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 11/10/11 7:56 PM, Mathias Bauer
wrote:
Am 10.11.2011 16:52,
Hi Oliver;
It's OK. The priority is clearly to get the IP
clearance done; I was just trying to set out
some plan to preserve the functionality much
easier for end users but this surely can wait.
Thanks for your hard work,
Pedro.
--- On Fri, 11/11/11, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
...
Hi,
hi
On 11 November 2011 05:39, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 10 November 2011 14:53, Louis Suárez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote:
Uhm. I think a list is good… but.
...
I can't give an accurate number right now, as the Web page is off. But
I'd say toward the end
c) Apache Open Office
--
This Apt Has Super Cow Powers - http://sourcefreedom.com
I am contributing to draft Apache OO 3.4 test plan and want help on old
3.4 test cases and test plan. Anyone know where I can get the old test
cases and old test plan? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Lily Zhao（赵遐）
QE Lead, Symphony
Email:zhao...@cn.ibm.com
Tel: 8610-82452706 Tieline: 9052706
IBM China
Hi;
People that like to check the commit logs may have noticed
a stream of patches tagged:
iXXX OS/2 port - - by Yuri Dario
Well, I am glad to announce the core of the OS/2 port is now
committed in the tree. There are still some small patches that
Yuri will by sending in soon, but in
Am 11/11/2011 07:36 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
People that like to check the commit logs may have noticed
a stream of patches tagged:
iXXX OS/2 port - - by Yuri Dario
yes, looks like an endless commit. ;-)
Well, I am glad to announce the core of the OS/2 port is now
committed in the
yes, looks like an endless commit. ;-)
it is :-)
Great, I keep my fingers crossed that a 3.4 build will work fine.
current status: builds :-) I still don't know if it runs, but I see
some problems in registry handling (component registration is now
different from 3.2). Also I'm unable to
--- On Fri, 11/11/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
...
iXXX OS/2 port - - by Yuri Dario
yes, looks like an endless commit. ;-)
FWIW, in the process I found we were doing pretty stupid
things like patching the redland license to choose LGPL
over AL2.
Do you have any numbers or realistic
I have no delusions that OS/2 is a major player, but it is still out
there as an active product and being developed for. FWIW, OS/2 is now
ecomstation.
http://www.ecomstation.com/
A new, major release was just recently completed, and I have no doubt
that current OS2/Ecomstation users appreciate
Ah yes:
http://www.ecomstation.com/product_info.phtml?url=nls/en/content/openoffice.html
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Fri, 11/11/11, Jerry Kemp wrote:
I have no delusions that OS/2 is a
major player, but it is still out
there as an active product and being developed for.
FWIW, OS/2 is now
http://www.apache.org/
is showing a garbled announcement for the Tika project. The top version
is fine, but another, further down (just above the Tomcat CVE), is trashed.
In particular, the date line shows garbles where em-dashes should be.
(Not to mention the headline.) I have seen similar
2011/11/11 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org
On 08/11/2011 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
dictionaries are extensions. They have their place at
http://extensions.services.**openoffice.org/en/dictionarieshttp://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/dictionaries
The people actually
Hello.
I have a problem with the implementation of the dialogs of UNO-AWT. When i
show the dialog as non-modal, using the setVisible method from the XWindow
interface, the showed dialog doesn't close or hides when i press the x
button (the default close button of all windows). Is it possible to
26 matches
Mail list logo
