RE: Access to the OOo extensions site at OUSL

2012-02-03 Thread drew
On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 09:55 +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:rgalopp...@geek.net] > > Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012 9:11 AM > > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Access to the OOo extensions site at OUSL > > > > Hi

Re: [BUG] Impress bug in OOo340m1 (Windows Built)...

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Acevedo
Although I never saved the document I will create a bug for ooo-bugzilla. Thanks of the assistance and will provide the link to the bug report so that everyone can vote for this issue. On Thursday, February 2, 2012, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi Michael, > > submitting a new issue is not really com

RE: Access to the OOo extensions site at OUSL

2012-02-03 Thread Gavin McDonald
> -Original Message- > From: Roberto Galoppini [mailto:rgalopp...@geek.net] > Sent: Saturday, 4 February 2012 9:11 AM > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Access to the OOo extensions site at OUSL > > Hi Drew, > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:20 PM, drew wrote: > > Hi Folks, >

Re: 2012-02-01 PPMC Status: End of Initial Committer Establishment

2012-02-03 Thread drew
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 15:45 -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > > wrote: > > > As of the end of day, 2012-01-31, the Apache OpenOffice podling has 85 > > > committers, with 67 on the PPMC. > > > >

Re: 2012-02-01 PPMC Status: End of Initial Committer Establishment

2012-02-03 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > > As of the end of day, 2012-01-31, the Apache OpenOffice podling has 85 > > committers, with 67 on the PPMC. > > > > Since the previous, 2011-11-17, report there is an increase of 4

Re: Access to the OOo extensions site at OUSL

2012-02-03 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Hi Drew, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:20 PM, drew wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Just wanted to touch base here. > > Did everyone (infra, SF) get what they needed now to move forward? actually we didn't get the code nor the database yet. Roberto > Thanks, > > //drew > > On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 13:48 -080

Re: Contributed code (was Re: Fake OpenOffice site?)

2012-02-03 Thread Andrew Rist
On 2/3/2012 2:38 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: Andrew, Is Oracle also granting to Apache license to the training material for OOo and Oracle Open Office? (I am not sure but believe that Oracle was only working on branded Oracle OO stuff, but it's very likely commutative.) -louis That stuff w

Re: Contributed code (was Re: Fake OpenOffice site?)

2012-02-03 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
Andrew, Is Oracle also granting to Apache license to the training material for OOo and Oracle Open Office? (I am not sure but believe that Oracle was only working on branded Oracle OO stuff, but it's very likely commutative.) -louis On 3 February 2012 17:23, TJ Frazier wrote: > On 2/3/2012 16:

Contributed code (was Re: Fake OpenOffice site?)

2012-02-03 Thread TJ Frazier
On 2/3/2012 16:37, Andrew Rist wrote: On 2/2/2012 4:50 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: On 2012-02-01 9:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote: 1) Oracle contributed the OpenOffice.org source code and trademarks to Apache Really? I thought Oracle granted a license of most of the OpenOffice.org source code to Apache

Re: Fake OpenOffice site?

2012-02-03 Thread Andrew Rist
On 2/2/2012 4:50 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: On 2012-02-01 9:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote: 1) Oracle contributed the OpenOffice.org source code and trademarks to Apache Really? I thought Oracle granted a license of most of the OpenOffice.org source code to Apache, not all of it. If they had grante

Re: Access to the OOo extensions site at OUSL

2012-02-03 Thread drew
Hi Folks, Just wanted to touch base here. Did everyone (infra, SF) get what they needed now to move forward? Thanks, //drew On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 13:48 -0800, Dave Fisher wrote: > On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:21 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > I'm here, I'm back, sorry I've been away for couple of w

Re: [BUILD]solaris build failed again.

2012-02-03 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hi L'oiseau de mer, On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 06:06:04PM +0800, L'oiseau de mer wrote: > I try to build AOO with some test tools, and have installed > cppunit-1.12.1 to system, and in AOO configure add the parametre: > --with-system-cppunit. > But build AOO in main/smoketestoo_native ,i meet some er

Re: 3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118293] bpurnachan...@gmail.com

2012-02-03 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 2:23 PM, wrote: > h...@apache.org has denied nandhu2...@openoffice.org's request for > 3.4_release_blocker: > Bug 118293: bpurnachan...@gmail.com > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118293 > FYI, these were caught by list moderation. I've approved the bugzi..

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118293] bpurnachan...@gmail.com

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied nandhu2...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118293: bpurnachan...@gmail.com https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118293 --- Additional Comments from h...@apache.org This is an invalid bug report

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 19291] Split Windows for single document

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied methylene_blue 's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 19291: Split Windows for single document https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=19291

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 75136] PDF page numbers incorrect

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied sgfan 's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 75136: PDF page numbers incorrect https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=75136

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 98587] Export PDF dialog should allow specification of the logical page numbers

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied sgfan 's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 98587: Export PDF dialog should allow specification of the logical page numbers https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=98587

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118047] This is a test

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied jmos...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118047: This is a test https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118047 --- Additional Comments from h...@apache.org This is an invalid bug report

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118032] getPrinter behavior changed between oo3.2.1 and oo3.3 - causing exception

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied itop...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118032: getPrinter behavior changed between oo3.2.1 and oo3.3 - causing exception https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118032 --- Additional Comments from h...@apache.org Kudos to Niklas for ident

3.4_release_blocker canceled: [Bug 118293] bpurnachan...@gmail.com

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Olaf Felka has canceled 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118293: bpurnachan...@gmail.com https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118293

3.4_release_blocker canceled: [Bug 118047] This is a test

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Olaf Felka has canceled 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118047: This is a test https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118047

Re: [BUILD]solaris build failed again.

2012-02-03 Thread L'oiseau de mer
I try to build AOO with some test tools, and have installed cppunit-1.12.1 to system, and in AOO configure add the parametre: --with-system-cppunit. But build AOO in main/smoketestoo_native ,i meet some error : Is this compiler problem? (suncc can't recognize the syntax? My compiler is SolarisStudi