Re: [BUILD]solaris build failed again.

2012-02-03 Thread L'oiseau de mer
I try to build AOO with some test tools, and have installed cppunit-1.12.1 to system, and in AOO configure add the parametre: --with-system-cppunit. But build AOO in main/smoketestoo_native ,i meet some error : Is this compiler problem? (suncc can't recognize the syntax? My compiler is

3.4_release_blocker canceled: [Bug 118047] This is a test

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Olaf Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de has canceled 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118047: This is a test https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118047

3.4_release_blocker canceled: [Bug 118293] bpurnachan...@gmail.com

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
Olaf Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de has canceled 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118293: bpurnachan...@gmail.com https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118293

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118032] getPrinter behavior changed between oo3.2.1 and oo3.3 - causing exception

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied itop...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118032: getPrinter behavior changed between oo3.2.1 and oo3.3 - causing exception https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118032 --- Additional Comments from h...@apache.org Kudos to Niklas for

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118047] This is a test

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied jmos...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118047: This is a test https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118047 --- Additional Comments from h...@apache.org This is an invalid bug report

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 98587] Export PDF dialog should allow specification of the logical page numbers

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied sgfan sg...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 98587: Export PDF dialog should allow specification of the logical page numbers https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=98587

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 75136] PDF page numbers incorrect

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied sgfan sg...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 75136: PDF page numbers incorrect https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=75136

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 19291] Split Windows for single document

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied methylene_blue methylene_b...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 19291: Split Windows for single document https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=19291

3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118293] bpurnachan...@gmail.com

2012-02-03 Thread bugzilla
h...@apache.org has denied nandhu2...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118293: bpurnachan...@gmail.com https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118293 --- Additional Comments from h...@apache.org This is an invalid bug report

Re: 3.4_release_blocker denied: [Bug 118293] bpurnachan...@gmail.com

2012-02-03 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 2:23 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: h...@apache.org has denied nandhu2...@openoffice.org's request for 3.4_release_blocker: Bug 118293: bpurnachan...@gmail.com https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118293 FYI, these were caught by list moderation. I've

Re: Fake OpenOffice site?

2012-02-03 Thread Andrew Rist
snip snip On 2/2/2012 4:50 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: On 2012-02-01 9:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote: 1) Oracle contributed the OpenOffice.org source code and trademarks to Apache Really? I thought Oracle granted a license of most of the OpenOffice.org source code to Apache, not all of it. If they

Contributed code (was Re: Fake OpenOffice site?)

2012-02-03 Thread TJ Frazier
On 2/3/2012 16:37, Andrew Rist wrote: snip snip On 2/2/2012 4:50 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: On 2012-02-01 9:01 PM, Rob Weir wrote: 1) Oracle contributed the OpenOffice.org source code and trademarks to Apache Really? I thought Oracle granted a license of most of the OpenOffice.org source code

Re: Contributed code (was Re: Fake OpenOffice site?)

2012-02-03 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
Andrew, Is Oracle also granting to Apache license to the training material for OOo and Oracle Open Office? (I am not sure but believe that Oracle was only working on branded Oracle OO stuff, but it's very likely commutative.) -louis On 3 February 2012 17:23, TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com

Re: Contributed code (was Re: Fake OpenOffice site?)

2012-02-03 Thread Andrew Rist
On 2/3/2012 2:38 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: Andrew, Is Oracle also granting to Apache license to the training material for OOo and Oracle Open Office? (I am not sure but believe that Oracle was only working on branded Oracle OO stuff, but it's very likely commutative.) -louis That stuff

Re: Access to the OOo extensions site at OUSL

2012-02-03 Thread Roberto Galoppini
Hi Drew, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:20 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: Hi Folks, Just wanted to touch base here. Did everyone (infra, SF) get what they needed now to move forward? actually we didn't get the code nor the database yet. Roberto Thanks, //drew On Wed, 2012-02-01 at

Re: 2012-02-01 PPMC Status: End of Initial Committer Establishment

2012-02-03 Thread drew
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 15:45 -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: As of the end of day, 2012-01-31, the Apache OpenOffice podling has 85 committers, with

Re: [BUG] Impress bug in OOo340m1 (Windows Built)...

2012-02-03 Thread Michael Acevedo
Although I never saved the document I will create a bug for ooo-bugzilla. Thanks of the assistance and will provide the link to the bug report so that everyone can vote for this issue. On Thursday, February 2, 2012, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Michael, submitting a new