As mentioned, I'd also be available to reviewing
I missed the deadline for submitting my own presentation. As I'm less involved
in AOO than before, okay; but I'd still be open to reviewing others'
submissions.
Louis
On 12-08-13, at 18:42 , Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 13/08/2012 Donald Harbis
Brian,
I've been speaking on the issue. I continue to do so. I probably know something
about it but can't guarantee that. I blog from time to time on the issue.
http://ooo-speak.blogspot.com/
and
http://www.luispo.com/
The facts: people are working on it. The issue is to have an ODF editor o
Hi
I cannot make the meeting this morning, Tuesday, at the Apache room here at
Oscon. I have lots of regrets about this.
I can relay to Matt (cc'd) a brief update of AOO(i) but I cannot make it myself.
Argh,
Louis
Dear Confused,
My reply is long; short answer: Porting evolved, and there were those builds
maintained by Sun for its clients and then there were those initiated and
maintained by the community. Over time, the roster of Sun-maintained ports
changed. I can give a bigger history of this—it's kind
I used to be tangentially involved in the Fluid Project, which promotes
"inclusive design," or designing, in this case, software that can work with all
people, not just a few. Now that we are at the cusp of invention and are
beginning debate and work on UX, I'd like to point the emerging group t
All
A notice from Brill Wright, board member of LinuxFest Northwest:
> a quick heads-up that LinuxFest Northwest is still open for Presenters,
> Exhibitors and Sponsorships. If you are interested, you can check out
> http://linuxfestnorthwest.org
> Best,
> Bill Wright
Bill subsequently wro
OpenOffice.org is by no means dead, though the old
site--www.openoffice.org---is probably best remembered by the new,
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
Soon(-ish), we will make it easier for users to find us.
But we are issuing test builds, and so on. So, dead no, live yes.
Louis
On
One of the things we did (and so do many others) at Ye Olde OOo was to post
interviews of contributors and then, as the wiki became more developed,
developer pages. We encouraged project leads to give credit where it was due
and to use the wikis, lists, whatever, for the purpose of recognition.
Hi drew and everyone else on earth now and later,
On 2011-12-21, at 22:01 , drew wrote:
> 1] You do know, however, that the mktg list I speak of is not the old
> list at OO.o - so while at the moment the issues are rather core and the
> dev list makes sense, it makes sense, IMO, to break 'artwork
OT, more or less...
I need to clarify the origin of the Native Language projects—and it's important
to do this, as part of the point of them was to capture the spirit of autonomy
that characterises Foss activity (you know, if you want something done right,
do it yourself: one way of putting it
Regular readers of this list might recall discussions by Khirano, Rob and
others about the fate of the Native Language projects in OOo. I'm not sure what
the outcome was, and a quick browse of archives didn't really enlighten me, as
it seems things were left hanging.
I'd like to see if we can r
Hi,
On 2011-11-16, at 20:23 , Rob Weir wrote:
> This topic sounds important, so I'm moving it to its own thread.
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Hollmichel
> wrote:
>>
>> removal of the Oracle branding is the easy part. As said before, having a
>> joint messaging with ASF about t
Ed is indeed a good guy :-) and has long supported OOo and its activities
(long: as in a decade).
On 2011-11-22, at 12:58 , Rob Weir wrote:
> I see from this old post that Ed thought bringing the forums together
> on the OOo domain might be a good idea:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/yjkoklov
13 matches
Mail list logo
