[restoring Cc to libreoffice dev list]
> >"The draw:angle attribute has the date type integer. A value of n is
> >interpreted as n*0.1 degrees."
>
> Sorry, I would not do that. This would limit the possible precision
> without needs in a format definition.
>
Tend to agree. Keep the double type, b
Herbert Duerr wrote:
> I also suggest to mention the issue tracker when referring to an
> issue number. In the history of the OOo project there were already
> three different bug-trackers were used. E.g. "issuetracker" that has
> been migrated to our bugzilla instance was referred to by the 'i'
> b
Andre Fischer wrote:
> Yes, as well as a higher code quality.
>
Metrics please, or didn't happen! ;)
Cheers from the off,
-- Thorsten
pgpGf0wXp2F6G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eric wrote:
> Unfortunaly, LibreOffice developers who did the commits, did not put
> my real name as author.
>
Complaints to svn please -
e.g. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1195273
Beyond that, thanks for the fixes of course.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgp8jrSk8msmo.pgp
Descr
Dave Fisher wrote:
> > The user has given me some details to reproduce. This seems
> > appear when LibO is already installed. If you add OOo, the
> > install process try to retreive the LibO profile The problem is
> > fixed if LibO is uninstalled.
> >
>
> This LibO and OOo thinking they are the
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> AGG stays. It's used here:
>
> canvas/source/tools/canvastools.flt
> canvas/source/tools/image.cxx
>
image.cxx is dead code as well. both can go, with agg.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpRpxR25jtd3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dave Fisher wrote:
> > I may remind you that, at the point
> > of responsible disclosure to securityteam@ooo, the
> > ooo-security@apache list was still in the process of being
> > setup/populated, and there was an ongoing policy discussion here.
>
> When that discussion was settled it seems someo
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I agree it needs to be addressed. What is ironic is that this
> discussion did NOT result in a breakdown of B at all, but
> rather a breakdown in another entity also not having a policy
> in place in sharing info with other community members.
>
Hi Jim,
since this is ambiguou
Armin Le Grand wrote:
> Not with SVG, but with canvas as it looks. It's used in
> canvas/source/tools for canvastools, see ENABLE_AGG and SYSTEM_AGG
> vars. I cannot tell if this is actively used, there are (dependent
> on ENABLE_AGG) two files in canvas/source/tools (bitmap.cxx and
> image.cxx) wh
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > > It is still early enough to reunify the code base and use the well
> > > known brand OpenOffice for a binary release. It would be the best
> > > choice for our users.
> > >
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but binary releases bearing that
> > name can only be made by
Hi Jürgen,
first off, glad to hear you stay with our code & the ecosystem! :)
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> From my point of view the reasons for the fork are not longer
> valid and it should be possible to continue one project, one
> office together.
>
I don't believe it's helpful to start a discussio
TJ Frazier wrote:
> Absent information to the contrary, it is entirely reasonable to
> assume that the authors were Sun/Oracle employees, doing their
> jobs.
>
That is not accurate. For example the German pages have been
(mostly) under the curation of the German volunteer community.
Whether submis
eric wrote:
> educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
> (because owned by pro-LO people).
>
nonsense. educoo.de points to your servers, you're free to post
whatever content you desire there (yes, I've read Florian's and your
answer to this).
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpZdebKf
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I am going to operate from the assumption that it is not
> appropriate to cherry-pick the OOo Apache Extra into the Apache
> SVN in any manner, although that code base can certainly be used
> consistent with the license already applied to it.
>
> Does anyone recognize a
Mathias Bauer wrote:
> Do we really want to have code in the svn repo that will never be used?
> The alternative would be to add cws to svn only after review.
>
A somewhat related question would be, until when will the Oracle
offer to extend the source code grant last? Since work done by
Oracle de
Ross Gardler wrote:
> At present the only way I can see to start doing this is to a) drop
> the ego on both "sides", this is a different world from the one in
> which the fork was seen as necessary. There are still fundamental
> licence differences, but I am sure that, for many, the licence is less
Should we maybe move that over to legal-discuss?
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I think that's reading too much into the Copyright Notice.
>
> The notice is not enough to determine what portions are under whose
> copyright. It is *not* all under Oracle copyright. In fact, I suspect the
> only
Frank Peters wrote:
> >um, I think the point made here is that certain content is *not*
> >copyright-shared with Oracle, and thus cannot be (easily)
> >relicensed?
>
> The point was about licenses and not copyright.
>
> The mentioned wiki Copyright page says
> "Copyright 1999, 2010 by the contr
Frank Peters wrote:
> >What caught my eye was the statement that some material was under
> >special licensing and you'd have to notice that on an individual-page
> >basis.
>
> That is indeed the case and the licensing situation on the
> wiki has traditionally been awkward. But couldn't Oracle
> re
19 matches
Mail list logo
