Hi Dennis,
Thank you so much! This email has answered my question why I can't visit the
Chinese community forum of Apache OOo. At present Apache OOo is a test
instance, and it is in the stage of the cut over and definition, for me it is
pretty normal not to browse the Chinese Forum page. Of
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
Hmm ...
It looks like I missed where the decision to use MediaWiki and deprecate
confluence
was taken. I guess it was arranged with infra as long as MW is up to date and
the extensions are documented.
I am not
As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed the all of the migration
work and all that was left was to create a final export and cut over the DNS
entries? In my mind, if there is already a lot of content on the MW and the
Apache Foundation allows us to continue to use it, why not?
On Tue,
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 08:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build OpenOffice?)
As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed the all of the migration
work and all that was left was to create a final export and cut
: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build
OpenOffice?)
As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed the all of the migration
work and all that was left was to create a final export and cut over the DNS
entries? In my mind, if there is already a lot of content on the MW
(was Re: Who Wants to build
OpenOffice?)
As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed the all of the migration
work and all that was left was to create a final export and cut over the
DNS
entries? In my mind, if there is already a lot of content on the MW and
the
Apache Foundation
, September 06, 2011 08:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re:
Who Wants to build
OpenOffice?)
As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed
the all of the migration
work and all that was left was to create a final
export and cut over
luck, Terry
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:20
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build OpenOffice?)
On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Matt Richards wrote:
Well
, 2011 11:20
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build
OpenOffice?)
On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Matt Richards wrote:
Well, I thought Terry has resigned from the project according to another
thread, leaving the wiki migration
:36
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build OpenOffice?)
Hello;
I have not been to involved with that process lately but
my understanding is:
- Infra requires a update to recent version of the
MediaWiki software.
- It would be preferable
[mailto:mricha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 08:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build
OpenOffice?)
As far as point 2, I thought Terry had completed the all of the migration
work and all that was left was to create
-Original Message-
From: Matt Richards [mailto:mricha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 08:32
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re:
Who Wants to build
OpenOffice?)
As far as point 2, I thought Terry
.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro F. Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:36
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build
OpenOffice?)
Hello;
I have not been
Richards [mailto:mricha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 14:56
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][wiki] Migration (was Re: Who Wants to build OpenOffice?)
I am in the same boat; attempting to step in and aid as he's left. Dunno
what thread contains
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 19:05 -0400, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/6/2011 18:03, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 17:30 -0400, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/6/2011 13:43, Matt Richards wrote:
Well, I thought Terry has resigned from the project according to another
thread, leaving the wiki migration at a
On Sep 6, 2011, at 4:46 PM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 19:05 -0400, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/6/2011 18:03, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 17:30 -0400, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/6/2011 13:43, Matt Richards wrote:
Well, I thought Terry has resigned from the project according to another
Totally willing to help with LAMP administration. :-)
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 6, 2011, at 4:46 PM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 19:05 -0400, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 9/6/2011 18:03, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 17:30 -0400,
One lurking question (suppose its also a decision) is content wise is there
a plan to transition the content on the current OO.org wiki over
to confluence? I'm gathering there are some licensing/community related
issues with doing so. But it seems kind of redundant/confusing to have two
wikis for
On Sep 5, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Matt Richards wrote:
One lurking question (suppose its also a decision) is content wise is there
a plan to transition the content on the current OO.org wiki over
to confluence? I'm gathering there are some licensing/community related
issues with doing so. But it
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 5, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Matt Richards wrote:
One lurking question (suppose its also a decision) is content wise is there
a plan to transition the content on the current OO.org wiki over
to confluence? I'm gathering
Hmm ...
It looks like I missed where the decision to use MediaWiki and deprecate
confluence
was taken. I guess it was arranged with infra as long as MW is up to date and
the extensions are documented.
I am not complaining though: it sounds like lazy consensus in action plus we can
always change
21 matches
Mail list logo
