Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-21 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Wolf Halton wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Wolf Halton > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 PM, drew wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:21 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, drew wrote: > >> > > >> >

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-21 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:42 PM, drew wrote: > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:21 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, drew wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:14 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > > > > 2012/6/20 drew jensen : > > > > >> > > > > >> List Conduct Policy > > > > >> > >

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Wolf Halton wrote: > Here is the adjusted version: > I put Dave's #7 as #0 and a reminder of the AOO mission and implications > thereof as #1. The private-lists entry is now at the bottom. > I've put the latest version up on the wiki, with some basic formatting

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 6/20/12 1:42 AM, drew wrote: > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:21 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, drew wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:14 +0200, RGB ES wrote: 2012/6/20 drew jensen : >> >> List Conduct Policy >> >>1. >>What Happens o

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread Wolf Halton
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Wolf Halton wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 PM, drew wrote: > >> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:21 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, drew wrote: >> > >> > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:14 +0200, RGB ES wrote: >> > > > 2012/6/20 drew

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread Wolf Halton
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:42 PM, drew wrote: > On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:21 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, drew wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:14 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > > > > 2012/6/20 drew jensen : > > > > >> > > > > >> List Conduct Policy > > > > >> > >

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread drew
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:21 -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, drew wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:14 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > > > 2012/6/20 drew jensen : > > > >> > > > >> List Conduct Policy > > > >> > > > >>1. > > > >>What Happens on the list, stays on the

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:33 PM, drew wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:14 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > > 2012/6/20 drew jensen : > > >> > > >> List Conduct Policy > > >> > > >>1. > > >>What Happens on the list, stays on the list: > > >>Anything you read in the private list is by default a

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread drew
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:14 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > 2012/6/20 drew jensen : > >> > >> List Conduct Policy > >> > >>1. > >>What Happens on the list, stays on the list: > >>Anything you read in the private list is by default a private PPMC > >>affair and not to be spoken of, or copied

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread RGB ES
2012/6/20 drew jensen : >> >> List Conduct Policy >> >>    1. >>    What Happens on the list, stays on the list: >>    Anything you read in the private list is by default a private PPMC >>    affair and not to be spoken of, or copied to, other people who are not in >>    the PPMC.  If you think abo

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread drew jensen
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 22:32 +0100, David McKay wrote: > On 19/06/12 21:26, Ross Gardler wrote: > > Top posting as I'm not commenting on the text itself. I'd like to request > > that this document clarifies the purpose of the private list - we don't > > want to give the impression that the project

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread David McKay
On 19/06/12 21:26, Ross Gardler wrote: Top posting as I'm not commenting on the text itself. I'd like to request that this document clarifies the purpose of the private list - we don't want to give the impression that the project conducts essential business on the private list. (My new text am

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread Ross Gardler
Top posting as I'm not commenting on the text itself. I'd like to request that this document clarifies the purpose of the private list - we don't want to give the impression that the project conducts essential business on the private list. Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and bre

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 06/19/2012 05:33 PM, schrieb sebb: On 18 June 2012 13:30, RGB ES wrote: 2012/6/18 Rob Weir: 1. What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas: Anything you read in the private list is by default a private PPMC affair and not to be spoken of, or copied to other people who are not in t

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread Donald Whytock
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:33 AM, sebb wrote: > I think the phrase may give the wrong impression. I assumed it was > akin to "don't broadcast what happens on a stag night" but having done > an internet search I see it's perhaps not quite the same. > > Nevertheless, I suggest a change to something

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-19 Thread sebb
On 18 June 2012 13:30, RGB ES wrote: > 2012/6/18 Rob Weir : >>>   1. >>> >>>   What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas: >>>   Anything you read in the private list is by default a private PPMC >>>   affair and not to be spoken of, or copied to other people who are not in >>>   the PPMC.  If you thin

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-18 Thread RGB ES
2012/6/18 Rob Weir : >>   1. >> >>   What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas: >>   Anything you read in the private list is by default a private PPMC >>   affair and not to be spoken of, or copied to other people who are not in >>   the PPMC.  If you think about it, most topic threads probably should

Re: [Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-18 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Wolf Halton wrote: > This is a draft with the additions from the group, for a lazy consensus. > I am envisioning that the final draft can be added to the sign-in progress > for the various mailing-lists and also as a link to the project > mailing-list page. > Pr

[Proposal] Guidelines for list conduct policy

2012-06-16 Thread Wolf Halton
This is a draft with the additions from the group, for a lazy consensus. I am envisioning that the final draft can be added to the sign-in progress for the various mailing-lists and also as a link to the project mailing-list page. I have not included any pieces about what happens to an individual