On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
OpenOffice is probably a special case wrt patents and
that's a special strength behind the Apache License so
I think it's good in case of big contributions (like
IBM's) to have such a document but otherwise I don't
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com wrote:
OpenOffice is probably a special case wrt patents and
that's a special strength behind the Apache License so
I think it's good in case of big
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So I don't think we can give an answer set in stone.
Again, section 5 of the Apache License is clear enough.
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
wrote:
So I don't think we can give an answer set in
stone.
Again, section 5 of the Apache License is clear
enough.
Hi Rob,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 20:11:01 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
So I think we take this on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I don't
have problems with a small patch of a few lines where the author has
clearly expressed they are contributing it under ALv2. But a patch of
10,000 lines
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 20:11:01 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
So I think we take this on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I don't
have problems with a small patch of a few lines where the author has
clearly expressed
Ahh.. found it!
The problem is solved in section 5 of the
Apache License:
___
5. Submission of Contributions.
Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted
for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and
conditions of this
Hi,
I'm going to warm this up, as legal seems to have no definite opinion on
it and effectively suggests the project has to establish its process and
decide how it will handle larger contributions. See
, August 31, 2011 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [legal] ICLA paragraph 7
Hi,
I'm going to warm this up, as legal seems to have no definite opinion on
it and effectively suggests the project has to establish its process and
decide how it will handle larger contributions. See
http://mail-archives.apache.org
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to warm this up, as legal seems to have no definite opinion on
it and effectively suggests the project has to establish its process and
decide how it will handle larger contributions. See
Hi Rob,
On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 16:06:48 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
Will AOOo accept code contributions under AL2, be it on the mailing
list, as JIRA attachment, or otherwise with consent of the original
author, without the author having signed an iCLA?
My position on this: yes, it
hi Apache mentors,
i've got a question as to what extent an ICLA from the copyright holder
is required for code contributions.
a volunteer who is currently working in GSoC over at LibreOffice (who
has not signed an Apache ICLA) has given me permission to contribute a
bunch of makefiles that
12 matches
Mail list logo
