Am 18.12.2011 01:06, schrieb Jean Weber:
On 18/12/2011, at 7:58, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
The user is free to pick another directory at install time, right? So
they can make the choice that works best for them.
My (often faulty) memory of recent OOo installs on Windows is that
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, Allen Pulsifer apulsi...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified
the
first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release.
I think I would prefer
If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what
would I say? Q1 2012? First half 2012? February 2012?
Ross
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Am 12/17/2011 05:09 PM, schrieb Ross Gardler:
If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what
would I say? Q1 2012? First half 2012? February 2012?
I would love to see the day where one could say Hey, the release is
faster than planned. Isn't that great?.
SCNR
Therefore I
We're nearing a copyleft-free build milestone. What I hear - and take
this as an estimate, not a commitment -would be Q1 for a 3.4 release.
-Rob
On Dec 17, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what
A further, related question (I'm working on a blog piece) would we say
Apache OpenOffice (incubating) plans to release a reference
implementation of the OpenOffice.org suite in ..., or is some other
phrasing preferred?
Ross
On 17 December 2011 16:51, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
We're
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
A further, related question (I'm working on a blog piece) would we say
Apache OpenOffice (incubating) plans to release a reference
implementation of the OpenOffice.org suite in ..., or is some other
phrasing
On 17 December 2011 16:24, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/17/2011 05:09 PM, schrieb Ross Gardler:
If I were to tell people when to expect an Apache OO release what
would I say? Q1 2012? First half 2012? February 2012?
...
Therefore I tent to First half 2012 when someone
On 17 December 2011 16:57, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
A further, related question (I'm working on a blog piece) would we say
Apache OpenOffice (incubating) plans to release a reference
My thought.
Given that OpenOffice.org 3.4 Beta is already out there.
An announcement along the lines of:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project set a tentative release time
for OpenOffice.org Version 3.4 for the 1st Qtr of 2012.
sounds about right to my ear.
The pressure of re-branding
at best
be a technology preview release.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: drew [mailto:d...@baseanswers.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:15
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
My thought.
Given that OpenOffice.org 3.4 Beta
: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
My thought.
Given that OpenOffice.org 3.4 Beta is already out there.
An announcement along the lines of:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project set a tentative release time
for OpenOffice.org Version 3.4 for the 1st Qtr of 2012.
sounds about
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:11
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
The releases have
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
The releases have to be rebranded anyhow, because they are currently
Oracle
branded. I think having it be OpenOffice.org 3.4
if at all possible and practical.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:11
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
Um, are you expecting that the first podling release of binaries will not be a
beta?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:59
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
On 17 December 2011 17:14, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project set a tentative release time
for OpenOffice.org Version 3.4 for the 1st Qtr of 2012.
Thanks Drew, I like that. The only problem is there is no consensus at
this point about branding/rebranding
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified the
first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release.
I think I would prefer Apache OpenOffice v1.0
On 18/12/2011, at 7:58, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I think it is irresponsible to not mitigate risk by having multiple levels
of fall-back in place always. Not installing a 3.4 atop a 3.3 is one of
On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, Allen Pulsifer apulsi...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified the
first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release.
I think I would prefer Apache OpenOffice v1.0
That would totally confuse most of the current users
Am 12/18/2011 01:08 AM, schrieb Jean Weber:
On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, Allen Pulsiferapulsi...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified the
first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release.
I think I would prefer Apache OpenOffice v1.0
That
On 18 December 2011 00:08, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, Allen Pulsifer apulsi...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified the
first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release.
I think I would prefer Apache
On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 12/18/2011 01:08 AM, schrieb Jean Weber:
On 18/12/2011, at 9:56, Allen Pulsiferapulsi...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice (incubating) project has tentatively identified the
first quarter of 2012 for a Version 3.4 release.
I
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 13:59
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: A timeline for an Apache OO release
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I think
On 2011-12-17 12:00 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17 December 2011 16:57, Donald Harbisondpharbi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
A further, related question (I'm working on a blog piece) would we say
Apache OpenOffice
25 matches
Mail list logo
