On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 26/07/2012 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Re -- security bug fixes. I know we did the older CVE-2012-0037 with
>> "patches" to Windows and Mac. But we weren't able to deal with a Linux
>> patch as I recall. (I don't know what progress has been
On 7/27/12 9:14 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 26/07/2012 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Re -- security bug fixes. I know we did the older CVE-2012-0037 with
>> "patches" to Windows and Mac. But we weren't able to deal with a Linux
>> patch as I recall. (I don't know what progress has been made on that
>> f
On 26/07/2012 Kay Schenk wrote:
Re -- security bug fixes. I know we did the older CVE-2012-0037 with
"patches" to Windows and Mac. But we weren't able to deal with a Linux
patch as I recall. (I don't know what progress has been made on that front).
For the record, Ariel provided a procedure to
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> When we release AOO 3.4.1 we will certainly get the question "What next?"
>
> What are we comfortable saying? Obviously we don't want to promise
> specific dates or features, but from what I'm seeing it sounds
> something like this:
>
> 1) A 3.
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> When we release AOO 3.4.1 we will certainly get the question "What next?"
>
> What are we comfortable saying? Obviously we don't want to promise
> specific dates or features, but from what I'm seeing it sounds
> something like this:
>
> 1) A 3.5.
When we release AOO 3.4.1 we will certainly get the question "What next?"
What are we comfortable saying? Obviously we don't want to promise
specific dates or features, but from what I'm seeing it sounds
something like this:
1) A 3.5.0 release, with more languages, bug fixes, interop work, also