On Nov 3, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David McKay wrote:
>>
>> On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
Hi, Mark, et al.,
Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just c
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David McKay wrote:
>
> On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>>>
>>> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
>>> in. I would have expected today's date.
>>
>> It is
On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
Hi, Mark, et al.,
Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
in. I would have expected today's date.
It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
upgrade.
There ma
On 10/29/2011 19:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
Hi, Mark, et al.,
Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
in. I would have expected today's date.
It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
upgrade.
Fine,
On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>
> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
> in. I would have expected today's date.
It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
upgrade.
> There may be another small problem with t
with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
Original Message
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 92549] Tracker for high priority Thai issues
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:50:08 +
From: bugzi...@apache.org
Reply-To: ooo-iss...@incubator.apache.org
To: ooo-iss...@incubator.apache.org
