On 01.11.2012 17:27, jan iversen wrote:
A brilliant idea, especially if I may copy some of your slides...
Sure.
I am still fumbling how the build works, and to be honest (NOT to criticize
anyone) I am not impressed.
That is a very friendly way to put it. I am still trying not to sound
t
A brilliant idea, especially if I may copy some of your slides...
I am still fumbling how the build works, and to be honest (NOT to criticize
anyone) I am not impressed.
Just one thing:
I do a "build --all", which comes back OK, then I do a second "build --all"
and to my surprise it generates a
On 30.10.2012 22:10, jan iversen wrote:
Just for info, Juergen told me that he was going to talk about l10n on
apacheCon, so I suggested that we could make a speech at FOSDEM, because at
that time the new workflow is hopefully ready or so close that we know all
details.
A good theme for a main s
Just for info, Juergen told me that he was going to talk about l10n on
apacheCon, so I suggested that we could make a speech at FOSDEM, because at
that time the new workflow is hopefully ready or so close that we know all
details.
A good theme for a main speech would be how the handle the build (a
On 26/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
There is another opportunity not to miss: we can propose a (technical)
talk about Apache OpenOffice as a Main Track Talk, see the same page.
Deadline 31 October. It would be good if Juergen, or another developer,
took the occasion to show something about OpenO
On 22/10/2012 Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 12-10-22, at 04:49 , Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 10/21/12 11:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
OpenOffice its own devroom, which will be available all day Saturday (2
Feb 2013).
We should try to find out if other Apache projects will be there as well
and if
On 12-10-22, at 04:49 , Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/21/12 11:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 16/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> I've asked the organizers to inform us about their decisions. I expect
>>> to receive news in the next days; I'll keep you informed when I do.
>>
>> I receive
On 10/21/12 11:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 16/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> I've asked the organizers to inform us about their decisions. I expect
>> to receive news in the next days; I'll keep you informed when I do.
>
> I received the answer just a few minutes ago: organizers decided
On 16/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I've asked the organizers to inform us about their decisions. I expect
to receive news in the next days; I'll keep you informed when I do.
I received the answer just a few minutes ago: organizers decided to give
OpenOffice its own devroom, which will be ava
Andrea,
On 12-10-15, at 18:17 , Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 15/10/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> would it be possible to ask back to the organizers? A deadline is a
>> deadline and we would like to know where we are. The organizers should
>> be able to give an answer in the next days.
>
> I've a
On 15/10/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
would it be possible to ask back to the organizers? A deadline is a
deadline and we would like to know where we are. The organizers should
be able to give an answer in the next days.
I've asked the organizers to inform us about their decisions. I expect
to r
On 10/14/12 6:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 11/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Yes; apparently LibreOffice had not thought about this, even though it
>> was clearly written in the guidelines that organizers would have asked
>> to merge similar devrooms. So we'll need to wait. The organizers
On 11/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Yes; apparently LibreOffice had not thought about this, even though it
was clearly written in the guidelines that organizers would have asked
to merge similar devrooms. So we'll need to wait. The organizers set
Saturday as a deadline.
For the record, I haven
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2012-10-11, at 20:52 , Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>> On 2012-10-11, at 24:24 , Rob Weir wrote:
OK. So we've said that we're happy to share a devroom. This is
good. Are we still waiting
Hi,
On 2012-10-11, at 20:52 , Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>> On 2012-10-11, at 24:24 , Rob Weir wrote:
>>> OK. So we've said that we're happy to share a devroom. This is
>>> good. Are we still waiting to hear from LO?
>
> Yes; apparently LibreOffice had not thought abou
Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 2012-10-11, at 24:24 , Rob Weir wrote:
OK. So we've said that we're happy to share a devroom. This is
good. Are we still waiting to hear from LO?
Yes; apparently LibreOffice had not thought about this, even though it
was clearly written in the guidelines that org
On 2012-10-11, at 24:24 , Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 09/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> And indeed this happened today: FOSDEM organizers, who received an
>>> application from Apache OpenOffice and one from LibreOffice, asked
>>> whet
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> And indeed this happened today: FOSDEM organizers, who received an
>> application from Apache OpenOffice and one from LibreOffice, asked
>> whether we can share a devroom. Of course this was alread
On 09/10/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
And indeed this happened today: FOSDEM organizers, who received an
application from Apache OpenOffice and one from LibreOffice, asked
whether we can share a devroom. Of course this was already in our
proposal, so I said it would be OK for us.
I was allowed t
On 27/09/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I've just sent the devroom application. ...
Our availability to share a joint devroom with other projects is stated
in the proposal, so it will likely happen that FOSDEM organizers
consider this option and make their recommendations accordingly.
And indeed t
On 25/09/2012 Juergen Schmidt wrote:
Am Montag, 24. September 2012 um 21:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
If nobody else steps up, I'll send the application after we have
consensus on it, but if anybody else wants to take over from now
on, it's absolutely OK for me, provided we meet the deadlines,
i.
Am Montag, 24. September 2012 um 21:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> > On 12-09-24, at 10:52 , Rob Weir wrote:
> > > Perhaps it could be de-politicized a little more if the request is
> > > for an "ODF Editors" room, and do with multilateral, with LO,
> > > Calligra, AbiWor
On 9/25/2012 3:32 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
[...]
Going on, this is the request I would send, posted here for corrections
and lazy consensus. Note: the "Saturday" choice below is totally arbitrary.
---
* Devroom name: Apache OpenOffice
* Description
Apache OpenOffice, formerly known as O
On 12-09-24, at 15:32 , Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> That would definitely be good for me too, and it's enough to declare in
> our application that we are available for such a solution. Note that
> there is no need for a joint proposal: FOSDEM organizers will collect
> the applications and, based on
Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 12-09-24, at 10:52 , Rob Weir wrote:
Perhaps it could be de-politicized a little more if the request is
for an "ODF Editors" room, and do with multilateral, with LO,
Calligra, AbiWord, Gnumeric, etc.
I'm all for that and tried that in 2011 but not this year (2012).
Sylvain,
On 12-09-24, at 12:08 , Sylvain DENIS wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am not a developer but user and representative Apache OpenOffice Belgium. I
> defend Apache OpenOffice in education in Belgium (french).
> I will at FOSDEM. This is an opportunity to meet and discuss even if my
> English is a
Hello
I am not a developer but user and representative Apache OpenOffice
Belgium. I defend Apache OpenOffice in education in Belgium (french).
I will at FOSDEM. This is an opportunity to meet and discuss even if my
English is approximate.
Regards
Sylvain DENIS
Le 24/09/12 13:20, Andrea Pesc
On 12-09-24, at 10:52 , Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> Depending on the feedback of the organizers I can also think about a
>>> joined devroom with the LibreOffice folks. Space for devrooms is limited
>>> and I can of course think about a joined effort here. I am at least open
>>> for this if wanted.
>
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 12-09-24, at 07:59 , Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 9/24/12 1:20 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> FOSDEM, one of the biggest Free and Open Source Software events in
>>> Europe, is coming again on 2-3 February 2013 in Brussels.
>>>
>>
On 12-09-24, at 07:59 , Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 9/24/12 1:20 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> FOSDEM, one of the biggest Free and Open Source Software events in
>> Europe, is coming again on 2-3 February 2013 in Brussels.
>>
>> Attendance is free and, moreover, "Developer Rooms" can be made
>>
On 9/24/12 1:20 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> FOSDEM, one of the biggest Free and Open Source Software events in
> Europe, is coming again on 2-3 February 2013 in Brussels.
>
> Attendance is free and, moreover, "Developer Rooms" can be made
> available upon request, but they must be requested befor
FOSDEM, one of the biggest Free and Open Source Software events in
Europe, is coming again on 2-3 February 2013 in Brussels.
Attendance is free and, moreover, "Developer Rooms" can be made
available upon request, but they must be requested before the end of
September. See https://fosdem.org/20
32 matches
Mail list logo
