On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari wrote:
> One major
> reason to rewrite OpenOffice in Java because Java support many languages
> (Scala, Jython, JRuby)
You clearly have no idea of the effort required to rewrite everything
in AOO in Java. I would vote against it.
Yes &q
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari wrote:
> . It will be easier to support a Java based OpenOffice due to
> Java's cross platform nature.
A Java spin-off of AOO written in Java on the other hand, starting
from scratch, would be good. Call it AOO-Lite.
But better yet, would be some FOSS
ired to be all things
to all people.
-Original Message-
From: suhail ansari [mailto:suhaila...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 09:41
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: OpenOffice in Java
As far as I know the only modern platform that doesn't support Java is iOS.
99% p
e.
> That is a beauty of open-source work that allows this to be done
> without expecting that one project be required to be all things
> to all people.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: suhail ansari [mailto:suhaila...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 09:41
&
On 05.07.2012 22:04, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2012 um 19:57 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
... cut ...
>> 3. Are you aware that the tendency is to remove Java dependencies from
>> OpenOffice? I don't know the reasoning, but it is happening.
AFAICT there was quite an anti-Java s
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari wrote:
>
> A Java spin-off of AOO written in Java on the other hand, starting
> from scratch, would be good. Call it AOO-Lite.
That's actually a pretty intriguing idea. Not a full AOO, but
so
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, suhail ansari wrote:
>>
>> A Java spin-off of AOO written in Java on the other hand, starting
>> from scratch, would be good. Call it AOO-Lite.
>
>
longer distributed as part of the installs.
I am not a party to any of that. I am simply observing it.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) [mailto:r...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 07:26
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice in
not a party to any of that. I am simply observing it.
Keep on observing. But join the party someday.
Regards,
Dave
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) [mailto:r...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 07:26
> To: ooo-dev@i
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> IMHO, the more interesting thing would be lighter-weight component,
> maybe HTML5 based. Data-aware, both common web formats like JSON and
> OData, but also ODF-aware. A spreadsheet component that you can
> easily embed into a website. Not on
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> No longer providing a JRE is more about the maturity and ubiquity of JVMs on
> consumer OSs.
Yes, packaging JREs along with apps is a capital sin in Java
development. It goes back to the days of the slightly incompatible
Java 1.1 and MSFT Ja
Am 06.07.2012 16:26, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
In addtion, the very important AOO scripting framework is totally Java based.
Why can I run all non-Java macros on a machine with no Java?
Hi Andreas,
On 07.07.2012 17:36, Andreas Säger wrote:
> Am 06.07.2012 16:26, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote:
>> In addtion, the very important AOO scripting framework is totally Java based.
>
> Why can I run all non-Java macros on a machine with no Java?
>
not sure, what you are after.
AFAIK, o
13 matches
Mail list logo
