Hi.
2012/6/5 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
If possible I would prefer to move forward with MediaWiki
Juergen
+1
Albino
On 6/10/12 10:36 PM, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote:
2012/6/10 TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com
On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote:
Hi, Kay,
IIUC, the automatic nav in cwiki is a genealogical thing: every page has a
parent, and that's what the nav display shows. That is easier than
...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 00:37
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org mailto:ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki
On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012
On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 06/06/2012 01:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
+1 on MediaWiki
The convergence on the Community Wiki was considered early in the
migration and
2012/6/10 TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com
On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote:
Hi, Kay,
IIUC, the automatic nav in cwiki is a genealogical thing: every page has a
parent, and that's what the nav display shows. That is easier than
categories — if you only want one category for that
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:30 PM, TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On 6/10/2012 12:51, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 06/06/2012 01:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org
mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.**orgdennis.hamil...@acm.org
On 6/5/12 9:13 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty
of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical
On 06.06.2012 05:57, imacat wrote:
It's relatively easy to start a new Wiki or discard an existing one.
But to form and keep a live Wiki community is a lot harder than just
moving.
Agreed.
Speaking of the OOo/AOO Wiki community the Wiki has been a target of
attacks by Spambots or
Hi all,
chengjh schrieb:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty
of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical
documents and so on..Currently,the planning and project tracking parts have
Herbert Duerr wrote:
Speaking of the OOo/AOO Wiki community the Wiki has been a target of
attacks by Spambots or Annoybots for a long time. ...
Whatever is decided to become the new Wiki I hope it is more
resilient against these attacks as we are a high profile target getting
plenty of page hits
2012/6/6 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de
Hi all,
Herbert Duerr schrieb:
On 06.06.2012 05:57, imacat wrote:
It's relatively easy to start a new Wiki or discard an existing one.
But to form and keep a live Wiki community is a lot harder than just
moving.
Agreed.
Speaking of
On 2012/06/06 19:56, Paulo de Souza Lima said:
2012/6/6 Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de
Hi all,
Herbert Duerr schrieb:
On 06.06.2012 05:57, imacat wrote:
It's relatively easy to start a new Wiki or discard an existing one.
But to form and keep a live Wiki community is a lot
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 00:37
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki
On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old
On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty
of valuable information,including
On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated
plenty of valuable
2012/6/5 Graham Lauder y...@apache.org
it would be indeed nice to have only one wiki. We have unresolved issues
with the old wiki content (unclear licenses) but MediaWiki as underlying
wiki software offers more features as far as I can see and the editing
is smoother for me. Very useful
[mailto:jogischm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 00:37
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Propose to Integrate Old OO Wiki and New AOO Wiki
On 6/5/12 5:11 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh chen...@apache.org
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty
of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical
documents and so on..Currently,the
KG01 - see comments inline.
On Jun 6, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty
of valuable
I have no opinion whether to join the two Wikis, or discard the
current MediaWiki. Actually, the current content on MediaWiki is quite
outdated and misleading. We may need significant amount of effort to
keep the MediaWiki dated. If we want to keep MediaWiki, we may need to
discard a large
On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
KG01 - see comments inline.
On Jun 6, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:35 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty
of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical
documents and so on..Currently,the planning and project tracking parts have
been moved to
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:35 AM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We see,the old OpenOffice.org wiki
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page has accumulated plenty
of valuable information,including planning,function specification,technical
23 matches
Mail list logo
