Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org:
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:04:15PM +0100, eric b wrote:
Question: shall I copy the whole trunk on the branch or only
trunk/main?
Very good question :-)
In fact, I don't know how to create a new
On 17/12/11 06:27, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
This way we can use branches/gbuild to create
further feature branches for gbuild conversion that can not be done on
trunk directly (here I can imagine the desktop module, for example).
errm, yes, converting the desktop module on master (not on a
have finished building on Fedora 16 64 bits, and fixing some
issues. I started building on WinXP (a VM, so it takes 5 hrs).
I'm not sure if the gnumake4 integration should be moved to a
feature branch.
Please use a feature branch
I'm going to create a feature branch, named gbuild (I won't
Hello Ariel,
Le 16 déc. 11 à 12:31, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit :
Hi there,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:33:47AM +0100, eric b wrote:
Please use a feature branch
I'm going to create a feature branch, named gbuild (I won't follow
the apache-id naming schema, because this was not my work,
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:04:15PM +0100, eric b wrote:
Question: shall I copy the whole trunk on the branch or only
trunk/main?
Very good question :-)
In fact, I don't know how to create a new branch with svn. Is there
a wiki page explaining that ?
I don't use svn myself
Hi Eric,
On 16.12.2011 14:05, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:04:15PM +0100, eric b wrote:
Question: shall I copy the whole trunk on the branch or only
trunk/main?
Very good question :-)
In fact, I don't know how to create a new branch with svn.
.)
-Original Message-
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 05:05
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: gnumake4 integration (was: Re: [Code] strategy for child works
spaces)
Hi Eric,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:04:15PM +0100, eric b
Hi Ariel;
--- Ven 16/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org ha scritto:
Hi there,
I'm going to create a feature branch, named gbuild (I won't
follow the apache-id naming schema, because this was not
my work, nor am I going to be the only one committing code
to it).
And as I said
Hi Pedro,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:10:55PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I'm going to create a feature branch, named gbuild (I won't
follow the apache-id naming schema, because this was not
my work, nor am I going to be the only one committing code
to it).
And as I said I'll gladly
--- Sab 17/12/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org ha scritto:
...
Data: Sabato 17 dicembre 2011, 00:27
Hi Pedro,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:10:55PM -0800, Pedro Giffuni
wrote:
I'm going to create a feature branch, named
gbuild (I won't
follow the apache-id naming schema,
On 25.11.2011 23:39, Gavin McDonald wrote:
[...]
I have finished building on Fedora 16 64 bits, and fixing some issues.
I started building on WinXP (a VM, so it takes 5 hrs).
Sorry to hijack, where are the requirements and build instructions for
building
on XP (and Win 7 too if possible.)
Hello guys;
Maho and I have been battling with an issue related to
the linking order on the vcl module for the FreeBSD
port. A quick look on the gnumake4 CWS, in particular
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/gnumake4/file/b3086537b169/vcl/Library_vcl.mk
makes me think it is fixed there.
I
gnumake stuff.
I have finished building on Fedora 16 64 bits, and fixing some issues.
I started building on WinXP (a VM, so it takes 5 hrs).
I'm not sure if the gnumake4 integration should be moved to a feature
branch. It is highly probable that it won't introduce any regression on
the core
-Original Message-
From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2011 8:34 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: gnumake4 integration (was: Re: [Code] strategy for child works
spaces)
Hi Pedro, *
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:59:38PM
, and fixing
some issues.
I started building on WinXP (a VM, so it takes 5 hrs).
I'm not sure if the gnumake4 integration should be moved to
a feature
branch. It is highly probable that it won't introduce any
regression on
the core functionality, as most changes are made to
Makefiles
Hello Gavin,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:39:20AM +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote:
I have finished building on Fedora 16 64 bits, and fixing some issues.
I started building on WinXP (a VM, so it takes 5 hrs).
Sorry to hijack, where are the requirements and build instructions for
building
on XP
also suspect the FreeBSD port will need adjustments for the new
gnumake stuff.
I have finished building on Fedora 16 64 bits, and fixing some
issues. I started building on WinXP (a VM, so it takes 5 hrs).
I'm not sure if the gnumake4 integration should be moved to a
feature branch.
Please
17 matches
Mail list logo
