Currently we have two Zseries builds performed every night for the trunk
5.0 version. Both are RPM-based, SLES 12 and RHEL 7.0. We currently do
not have access to an Debian-based Zseries platform.
David Ashley
On 01/08/2015 12:40 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it
Good point. 5.0.0 it is. I'll try it with CMake.
Next step is finding a z/OS platform to work.
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Neither one should be an easier port target than the other, although I'm
> not particularly happy about having to support a new release
Neither one should be an easier port target than the other, although I'm
not particularly happy about having to support a new release of 4.2.0 when
the rest of the platforms will be moving the 5.0.0 code base.
Rick
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Hobart Spitz wrote:
> That did the trick.
>
> A
That did the trick.
A bit more advice if you don't mind. This was just a dry run to get me
familiar with the build process in preparation for attempting a port to
z/OS. So, my question is whether USS is an easier port target for 4.2.0 or
5.0? I realize that this would depend on whether the vari
The message below means the the autoconf package has not been installed
on your system. You need to install it and then restart the process
(with ./configure).
FYI - version 5.0 of ooRexx is under development in the Subversion
trunk. It uses the CMake package to control the build and is a drea
Here's a rough recap what what I did:
- Downloaded and extracted ooRexx.4.2.0.tar.gz.
- Per my reading of unix-like-build.txt, I issued ./configure and then
./make. There were some messages that got away from me because of volume.
(Terminal is now set to save all output.)
- I tri
I guess first we need to establish just what you overall build
convention and environment is. Are you using the latest trunk (with
CMake)? Are you performing an out-of-source build? If you are trying to
compile an older version of ooRexx there are other questions that need
to be asked.
David
