Hello,
one question regarding the naming:
This this thing be called RC2 or beta 2 ??
I will provide an AIX build 32/64 for AIX 5.3/6.1.
Bye
Rainer
On 14.04.2010 17:27, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
We haven't had any bugs opened specifically for the beta 1 build.
There was just this one: 2981692
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Rainer Tammer tam...@tammer.net wrote:
one question regarding the naming:
This this thing be called RC2 or beta 2 ??
Neither, it is called rc1. grin
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
We haven't had any bugs opened specifically for the beta 1 build.
There was just this one: 2981692 rpm installation hangs starting
rxapi, where the reporter mentioned that he saw the same thing on
4.0.1. I fixed that.
So, I think we should maybe do a beta 2, and if no one reports any
bugs
This sounds like a good plan to me. I had come to the same conclusion
about wrapping up the beta1. I think given the lack of bug activity,
maybe we should call the next spin release candidate 1 rather than a
beta.
Rick
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
A second beta sounds ok but I am not sure if it is really needed. Maybe
we should just go ahead with the official release.
David Ashley
On 04/14/2010 10:27 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
We haven't had any bugs opened specifically for the beta 1 build.
There was just this one: 2981692 rpm
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:02 AM, David Ashley
david.ashley@gmail.com wrote:
A second beta sounds ok but I am not sure if it is really needed. Maybe
we should just go ahead with the official release.
Yeah, I wasn't sure it is needed either.
Let's go with Rick's idea and call it Release
