Well spotted. It was not intentional 😬😱😞I had saved the previously built documents and could upload them so they should be ok. The only files with the wrong date are the zip files. If you think it is needed I can tweak the dates for those. This is on my todo list for some reason the docbuildscript
Hi P.O.,
I noticed from the recent SVN activity that all of the 5.1.0 documents
had been rebuilt. Was this intentional or an artifact of your testing?Â
Just curious 🙂.
Gil
On 4/20/2024 8:42 AM, ooRexx wrote:
On 20. Apr 2024, at 13:34, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
Hi P.O.,
thank you for y
> On 20. Apr 2024, at 13:34, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> Hi P.O.,
>
> thank you for your information and efforts!
>
> How about targeting an initiative to create a new release (5.1.0) at the
> beginning of June then?
>
>
I am fine with that Rony, if there is a decision to go ahead at that
Hi P.O.,
thank you for your information and efforts!
How about targeting an initiative to create a new release (5.1.0) at the
beginning of June then?
Cheers
---rony
On 19.04.2024 19:01, ooRexx wrote:
A progress report on my activites today.
The test was partially successful, if you look a
A progress report on my activites today.
The test was partially successful, if you look at Sourceforge you will find two
folders 5.0.0test under /files/oorexx and /files/oorexx-doc. They are staged so
only visible if you are logged on to sourceforge.
For the understanding of how Jenkins works:
Hi P.O.,
this is very good news, and thank you for the effort. I will be sure to commit
exactly nothing today and hope the others follow.
best regards,
René.
> On 18 Apr 2024, at 23:32, ooRexx wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> In preparation for the next release I am doing a "dry-run" on some tasks
Dear all,
In preparation for the next release I am doing a "dry-run" on some tasks
tomorrow, I would appreciate if no commits (neither for builds nor for
documentation) were made tomorrow, 19/4.
The test does not involve any commits, hence "dry"
Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@j
