Dear P.O.,
On 20.07.2022 08:25, ooRexx wrote:
I assume this functionality can not be made a library (like orxutils et al) but need to be
included in the build process, right? IF not included/accepted in the trunk I suggest you put all
the necessary files in an entry under tools and document how
Dear Rony,
I assume this functionality can not be made a library (like orxutils et al) but
need to be included in the build process, right? IF not included/accepted in
the trunk I suggest you put all the necessary files in an entry under tools and
document how to make it work. In this way anyon
On 17.07.2022 21:00, Michael Lueck wrote:
Greetings ooRexx'ers,
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
While debugging (for almost two months) ooRexx and BSF4ooRexx/Java it was almost impossible to
determine the source of some memory leaks.
The reason was not being able to rely on the garbage collector hav
Greetings ooRexx'ers,
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
While debugging (for almost two months) ooRexx and BSF4ooRexx/Java it was
almost impossible to determine the source of some memory leaks.
The reason was not being able to rely on the garbage collector having run at a specific point in time such th
On 16.07.2022 17:31, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:25 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
On 16.07.2022 17:18, Rick McGuire wrote:
I am a serious -1 to this proposal. This is something with serious
performance implications
and will only be misused by people who don't un
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:25 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> On 16.07.2022 17:18, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> I am a serious -1 to this proposal. This is something with serious
> performance implications and will only be misused by people who don't
> understand how garbage collection works. There, you
On 16.07.2022 17:18, Rick McGuire wrote:
I am a serious -1 to this proposal. This is something with serious performance implications and
will only be misused by people who don't understand how garbage collection works. There, you no
longer need to worry about silent assent.
Indeed.
So, Rick,
I am a serious -1 to this proposal. This is something with serious
performance implications and will only be misused by people who don't
understand how garbage collection works. There, you no longer need to worry
about silent assent.
Rick
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:12 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
