On Mar 5, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Jason Etheridge wrote:
>> We are running EG 2.2.5 and I would like to block a permission group from
>> using "amnesty mode" with check-ins? For example we would like the
>> professional staff permission group to be allowed to activate "amnesty mode"
>> during check-i
> We are running EG 2.2.5 and I would like to block a permission group from
> using "amnesty mode" with check-ins? For example we would like the
> professional staff permission group to be allowed to activate "amnesty mode"
> during check-ins, but not our student employees. Is this possible? I trie
Hello,
We are running EG 2.2.5 and I would like to block a permission group
from using "amnesty mode" with check-ins? For example we would like
the professional staff permission group to be allowed to activate
"amnesty mode" during check-ins, but not our student employees. Is
this possibl
Thanks Mike! That's good to hear.
Kathy
On 3/5/2013 3:22 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
Kathy and Elaine,
Elaine, I'd encourage you to send the original docs, and once the tech
specs are complete we'll share those as well. Kathy, as for the
specifics of when to fine, in what manner and how much,
Kathy and Elaine,
Elaine, I'd encourage you to send the original docs, and once the tech
specs are complete we'll share those as well. Kathy, as for the specifics
of when to fine, in what manner and how much, and when and what to void or
unvoid at various events, that will be configurable via a s
Hi Elaine,
That's wonderful news!
I would be interested in seeing the requirements doc. From your
description, it sounds like you'll be covering a bulk of what we want to
do with the long overdue process. We are looking for an option as to
whether the long overdue process should bill for the
Hello everyone,
The Evergreen Documentation Interest Group has its next meeting
scheduled for Thursday, March 7, 2013 at 2:00 PM EST on the
#EvergreenIRC channel (http://evergreen-ils.org/irc.php).
Anyone interested in documentation is welcome to attend. An agenda has
been posted at http:
Kathy,
PINES does make a distinction between overdue, longoverdue and lost and
has just contracted with ESI for development of a Longoverdue process. In
PINES, overdue is anything under 180 days, lost are items patrons report
they have lost and Longoverdue is a set by the system when an item is 18
Hi Kathy,
I remember talking about long overdue status changing a few years ago
with some folks.
But basically, there exists a script for that action:
Open-ILS/src/support-scripts/long-overdue-status-update.pl
That script takes an argument for a specific period of time (or seems to
default
Hi all,
We've been having some local discussions on issues related to billing,
overdue items, etc. in the hopes of sponsoring some enhancements for
billing in Evergreen. As part of these discussions, we've been talking
about identifying copies that are long overdue (not lost).
I've noticed i
10 matches
Mail list logo
