Re: Question about /sys/class/iscsi_connection

2010-01-10 Thread Mike Christie
On 01/08/2010 02:07 PM, Yangkook Kim wrote: Hi, Mike. Thank you for the reply. OK, now I see the history. P.S. I also thought that connectionXX:0 is misleading. XX is supposed to be where iscsi session number is put after binding connection and session. I did not get what you mean here.

Re: Question about /sys/class/iscsi_connection

2010-01-08 Thread Yangkook Kim
Hi, Mike. Thank you for the reply. OK, now I see the history. P.S. I also thought that connectionXX:0 is misleading. XX is supposed to be where iscsi session number is put after binding connection and session. I did not get what you mean here. The XX is the session number. Probably I

Re: Question about /sys/class/iscsi_connection

2010-01-06 Thread Mike Christie
On 01/02/2010 01:56 PM, Yangkook Kim wrote: Hi, Group, I am wondering why we have /sys/class/iscsi_connection for iscsi connection in sysfs filesystem. I understand that the one or more iscsi connection form a single iscsi session and, in this sense, iscsi connection subordinates to iscsi

Question about /sys/class/iscsi_connection

2010-01-02 Thread Yangkook Kim
Hi, Group, I am wondering why we have /sys/class/iscsi_connection for iscsi connection in sysfs filesystem. I understand that the one or more iscsi connection form a single iscsi session and, in this sense, iscsi connection subordinates to iscsi session. Then, it more makes sense if we have