On 11 Jun 2009 at 12:41, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we
> are going to hav
> -Original Message-
> From: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-is...@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:10 PM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: do we need a new list for kernel patches
>
>
&
> >>> see what features are making progress?
> >> Does splitting the mailing list to userpace and kernel have merit?
> >> Thoughts ...
> >>
> >
> >
> > Was this mail stuck in moderation?
> >
>
> Yeah, not sure what happened, because you were using your dell account.
> I just saw it today in t
RE: do we need a new list for kernel patches
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-
>> is...@googlegroups.com]
>>> On Behalf Of Mike Christie
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:11 PM
>>> To
> -Original Message-
> From: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-is...@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of shyam_i...@dell.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:39 PM
> To: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
> Subject: RE: do we need a new list for kernel patches
>
> -Original Message-
> From: open-iscsi@googlegroups.com [mailto:open-is...@googlegroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Mike Christie
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:11 PM
> To: open-iscsi
> Subject: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches
>
>
> Hey,
>
&g
> > I agree that having just one mailing list is the most convenient for
> > kernel developers. But not everyone who is subscribed to open-iscsi is
> > a kernel developer. Wouldn't it be more convenient for iSCSI users to
> > have two lists -- one intended for iSCSI users, and one for iSCSI
> > de
On 06/14/2009 12:52 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 06/11/2009 08:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
>>> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 06/11/2009 08:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
>> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
>> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
>> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being writte
On 06/11/2009 08:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we
> are going to have lot
Mike Christie wrote:
> So it seems like we are going to have lots of patches. I would also like to
> start sending my kernel patches out in a way that everyone can see them.
> Previously to avoid noise on this list, I have been pinging you guys
> privately which just does not work so well now
Having everything in a single list sounds like a better idea to me. If
we have 2 lists, many people will have to monitor both.
Erez
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"open-iscsi" group.
To post to this
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:41:17PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we
>
Creating a new list would be a better idea.
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:41 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another bei
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:41:17PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we
>
On 06/11/2009 07:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
> developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
> iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we
> are going to have lots
Hey,
It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel
developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i,
iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we
are going to have lots of patches. I would also like to start sending my
kern
17 matches
Mail list logo
