On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Dimitris Zilaskos wrote:
Hello and sorry for the OT ,
We are running a Heimdal KDC which is also an OpenAFS 1.2 server.
We have been using it for sometime with windows and gentoo linux clients.
Recently we installed Scientific Linux 3.0.4, a RHEL compatible OS. Using
aut
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Mike Fedyk wrote:
http://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2002-September/005812.html
Are there any plans to remove this limitation?
The directory object format will need to change. There's a plan but it's
not simple by any stretch.
_
http://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2002-September/005812.html
Are there any plans to remove this limitation?
How can anyone use AFS for their home directory with a MailDir based
mail program and subscribe to an active list?
Mike
___
OpenAFS
Hi,
Here is my current (probably flawed) understanding of callbacks.
When the cache manager (CM) connects to a RW volume, it sets a callback
for that file to be notified to invalidate its local copy if another CM
writes to the file. Kinda like Oplocks in the SMB/CIFS world.
So, why couldn't cal
Chris Huebsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Exactly. I strongly recommend using LDAP to distribute user-info (as a
> replacement for /etc/passwd).
> As far as I tried it, it integrates well with Linux and Solaris.
> Hesiod, NIS, etc. are not that flexible and stable.
Not that I would actually e
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, rogbazan wrote:
What is the risk of running different versions in client than server roles?
i mean, could i install OpenAFS on my Solaris Client, having IBM
Transarc on my dbservers and fileservers?
Yes, sure, that's fine.
___
OpenAF
What is the risk of running different versions in client than server roles?
i mean, could i install OpenAFS on my Solaris Client, having IBM
Transarc on my dbservers and fileservers?
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:20:17 -0500 (EST), Derrick J Brashear
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, rog
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Dj Merrill wrote:
Benjamin P Myers wrote:
openldap isn't so hard to configure if you're not going to worry about some
of the more advanced features like TLS, SASL, etc.
Exactly. I strongly recommend using LDAP to distribute user-info (as a
replacement for /etc/passwd).
As
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, rogbazan wrote:
Let me see if i understood what you say:
My client´s version (ibm transarc v3.6 rel 2.48), is very old.
Yes.
It does not occurs with OpenAFS?
Unknown. No basis for comparison. While the view to a user should be the
same we have changed and fixed things; I haven
Let me see if i understood what you say:
My client´s version (ibm transarc v3.6 rel 2.48), is very old.
It does not occurs with OpenAFS?
The " if " code that you are adding to your answer is part of IBM
Transarc version´s or, it appears in Open AFS too?.
Th conclusion could be the insufficient nu
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, rogbazan wrote:
Hi, we had a client on a SunFire 15K, and it died, a few days ago.
Sun Microsystems review the dump generated by the host at the panic
time; and this what they told us about the problem:
It called osi_Panic in afs_GetDCache, but this isn't even OpenAFS,
perhaps
Hi, we had a client on a SunFire 15K, and it died, a few days ago.
Sun Microsystems review the dump generated by the host at the panic
time; and this what they told us about the problem:
Lines in the dump file:
Mar 2 20:07:03 2005 panic[cpu482]/thread=3009a3306c0: getdcache <--
Panic: it points t
Benjamin P Myers wrote:
openldap isn't so hard to configure if you're not going to worry about some of
the more advanced features like TLS, SASL, etc. Long run, it might be better
for you to go that route because you can use it to backend kerberos and for
dns--it could simplify things for you l
Dj Merrill wrote:
I've considered NIS, but don't really care for it, and
LDAP might have some possbibilities, but we don't want to delve into
Personally I'd go the LDAP route. It may require a little more work
at the outset, but once you've done it, you've done it. It also makes
your use
On Thursday 10 March 2005 12:10 am, Dj Merrill wrote:
> I've considered NIS, but don't really care for it, and
> LDAP might have some possbibilities, but we don't want to delve into
> its depths at this time. Distributing the /etc/passwd text file
> would seem to be the preferred method at
Hi all,
I've worked with AFS/OpenAFS for about 5 years in total, and
may have the opportunity to setup a fresh OpenAFS installation from
scratch in the near future. In my previous employment, we had a bunch
of homebrew scripts to manage a text-file database that would generate
appropriate
If the fileserver is running, put a volume on it. "vos create -help"
Mount the volume. (fs mkmount -help)
cd to the mount point.
client reads mount point, asks vlserver where new volume is located.
vlserver looks up volname, returns location, which is a vice partition on
the new fileserver.
Christoph Ziegler wrote:
We have a problem with OpenAFS1.3.7700 (also with 1.3.7801 or 1.3.7702) on
terminal servers
(Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition).
Users can work with all applications, also with AFS.
But if more than one users work at the same time activ with AFS (e.g. copying
at the sa
Ingo van Lil wrote:
Yes, there is: I'm using ReiserFS for all my regular partitions. Forgot
to mention that, sorry.
No you didn't; you did mention it :)
--
Chris Crowther
J&M Crowther Ltd.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https
server OS: win2k
cell OS: rh9
Problem: how can I make the added server (file server is running) visible in my
existing cell. I've been reading the "Installing Additional Server
Machines:Installing an Additional File Server Machine" section of the manual,
but I'm unsure of what instructions to b
On 10 Mar 2005, Jim Rees wrote:
> Also, there is no reason the cache has to be on a separate partition.
Yes, there is: I'm using ReiserFS for all my regular partitions. Forgot
to mention that, sorry.
Apart from that: Having the cache on a separate partiton avoids AFS
problems in case the / partit
Sometimes people's root partition is reiserfs or xfs (or...) ...
Matt
Jim Rees wrote:
That was easy, thanks a lot. :-)
Also, there is no reason the cache has to be on a separate partition.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://li
That was easy, thanks a lot. :-)
Also, there is no reason the cache has to be on a separate partition.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
On 10 Mar 2005, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> Upgrade to OpenAFS 1.3.79... The 1.3.78 version has a problem that causes the
> cache fs to remain marked in use even when AFS has been shut down.
That was easy, thanks a lot. :-)
Cheers,
Ingo
__
We have a problem with OpenAFS1.3.7700 (also with 1.3.7801 or 1.3.7702) on
terminal servers
(Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition).
Users can work with all applications, also with AFS.
But if more than one users work at the same time activ with AFS (e.g. copying
at the same time),
then AFS Clie
Upgrade to OpenAFS 1.3.79... The 1.3.78 version has a problem that causes the
cache fs to remain marked in use even when AFS has been shut down.
Kris
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:36:44PM +0100, Ingo van Lil wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I recently installed OpenAFS 1.3.78 on my Linux 2.6.8 laptop.
>
Hi there,
I recently installed OpenAFS 1.3.78 on my Linux 2.6.8 laptop.
Unfortunately I didn't think I'd ever need to access AFS on that machine
when I installed my distribution, so I didn't allocate any space for an
ext2 AFS cache partition (I'm using reiserfs for about everything). So,
in order
I (Dr A V Le Blanc) wrote:
> After some careful testing on various smaller machines, we decided
> to move one of our web servers to Openafs 1.3.79 with kernel 2.6.11;
> with the exception of the kernel, we are using a fairly standard
> Debian sarge system, with glibc 2.3.2.
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at
28 matches
Mail list logo
