-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin schrieb:
| On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 16:27 +0100, Lars Schimmer wrote:
|
|
|>Ok, these are my first steps with kerberos 5 and I'm willing to learn,
but why
|>does OpenAFS not accept my valid tokens? I assumed with a valid token
I can
|>access the Open
On Monday, March 14, 2005 04:50:55 PM -0600 Nathan Neulinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. You'd be more properly looking for 'libviced' not 'libafsd', as afsd
is the client not the server.
2. There is a tool that re-exports a local filesystem as read-only AFS
data that was not maintained, but I
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 09:13 +0100, Stefaan wrote:
> Server works too. Both server and client have been running on my
> machine for more than 2 monthes now. Currently running OpenAFS 1.3.79 on
> 2.6.11-gentoo-r2.
Stefaan, would you be so kind as to provide (either on- or off-list as
you prefer) a
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 16:27 +0100, Lars Schimmer wrote:
> Ok, these are my first steps with kerberos 5 and I'm willing to learn, but why
> does OpenAFS not accept my valid tokens? I assumed with a valid token I can
> access the OpenAFS tree...
> Any hints?
Hi Lars-
I've been running an integrate
Christian Fischer wrote:
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
I do not believe there has been any change in behavior. Are you aware
of a version of AFS for Windows which does what you expect?
no, as I wrote, we didn't notice when the change happened. (Only the
users did :-( ). However, officially afs should s
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> I do not believe there has been any change in behavior. Are you aware
> of a version of AFS for Windows which does what you expect?
no, as I wrote, we didn't notice when the change happened. (Only the
users did :-( ). However, officially afs should support file lockin
Hi Ben,
--On 15 March, 2005 12:03:50 -0600 Ben Staffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 11:44] wibbled:
I have installed openafs on two mac os 10.3 systems. after
installation it seems that starting the mac, ie. from the point of
logon to the point where the u
* David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-15 11:44] wibbled:
> I have installed openafs on two mac os 10.3 systems. after
> installation it seems that starting the mac, ie. from the point of
> logon to the point where the user interface shell becomes responsive,
> takes an exceptionally long amount
I have installed openafs on two mac os 10.3 systems. after
installation it seems that starting the mac, ie. from the point of
logon to the point where the user interface shell becomes responsive,
takes an exceptionally long amount of time. I'm curious if
1) anyone else has seen this
2) if there i
There are known problems with fail over in the existing windows clients.
They will be fixed in the next release. Once a volume goes offline the
client's state machine treats the volume as being busy instead of
offline and never queries the vldb to refresh the server list.
Jeffrey Altman
smime.
We're running OpenAFS 1.2.13 on our servers, and have 1.3.77 Windows
clients and 1.2.13 Linux (2.4.26) and OS X clients. Last week we had a
failure in the storage unit for one of our AFS fileservers, which
caused a read-only volume on that server to be taken offline. The RW
copy was on our ot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'm good on the way to migrate to krb5 fom builtin akserv.
Right now I setup a kerberos 5 server, I setup the key into the OpenAFS keyfile
and I setup some principals.
So I log in into the kerberos server, type kinit and than I aklog and get my
tok
Joe Buehler wrote:
In customizing the MSI installer, one thing I have not been
able to figure out is how to tell the installer to ignore
any existing CellServDB file and just go ahead and write
to disk what's in the MSI file.
If someone could tell me how to accomplish this I would
appreciate it.
Yo
Suse 9.x 2.4 kernel afs 1.2.11 works well here, experimenting with 2.6
kernel & latest afs release.
SuSe uses Heimdal which is slightly different than MIT kerberos.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lars Schimmer
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 200
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 18:25 +0100, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> Latest in is 1.2.11. It's masked "~x86 ~alpha ~ia64", stable on none.
> So a minimal suggestion would be to add a "net-fs/openafs ~*" line
> to /etc/portage/package.keywords, then re-emerge openafs. I insist:
> that's only a minimal solutio
I actually found your page after I posted the question.
I am having problems using the 'old' FC2 rpm - openafs-1.3.74-3.src.rpm
I have downloaded it and run rpm -ivh openafs-1.3.74-3.src.rpm as the
instructions state.
However - I don't get anything extracted into the directory. What am I missi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
| Hello Everybody,
|
| Thx for the respons in previous posts, but what I want to know is wich
distribution of Linux is the best to implement an OpenAFS system?
| I already tried Slackware and Gentoo, but both off them are not
Hello Everybody,
Thx for the respons in previous posts, but what I want to know is wich
distribution of Linux is the best to implement an OpenAFS system?
I already tried Slackware and Gentoo, but both off them are not the best
distributions for OpenAFS.
Who has good experiences with OpenAFS on L
Server works too. Both server and client have been running on my
machine for more than 2 monthes now. Currently running OpenAFS 1.3.79 on
2.6.11-gentoo-r2.
The same bugzilla entry contains a dirty patch that loads the module and
starts afs automatically. You may prefer rc-scripts, shutting down
19 matches
Mail list logo
