On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:41:02 +0100
Sergio Gelato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Paul Johnson [2006-01-19 23:21:01 -0600]:
> > Starting AFS cache scan...<6>tg3: eth0: Link is up at 10 Mbps, half
duplex.
>
> That's a slow network link by today's standards, and half duplex can
> lead to a higher rat
You received many good answers and I would just like to add some
small details.
Leroy Tennison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does AFS compare in administrative burden compared to the
> common PC NOSes (NetWare and AD)?
It has been quite long since I saw NetWare but keeping file
history so user
* Paul Johnson [2006-01-19 23:21:01 -0600]:
> When I type
>
> $ klog pauljohn
>
> the system waits for between 40 and 50 seconds. THere are no errors,
> and eventually the klog is approved. The connection is good and I can
> move files in and out of /afs/ku.edu, our cell.
[...]
> How to debug?
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Dan Pritts wrote:
the installation notes when installing openafs 1.4.1-rc4 suggest
that you unmount /afs manually before shutdown, or else the system
will hang.
I can confirm the hanging problem.
I can't, however, figure out how to successfully unmount.
vfr800:~ root# um
the installation notes when installing openafs 1.4.1-rc4 suggest
that you unmount /afs manually before shutdown, or else the system
will hang.
I can confirm the hanging problem.
I can't, however, figure out how to successfully unmount.
vfr800:~ root# umount /afs
umount: unmount(/afs): Resour
Um, it did make it to the list just fine the first time. Perhaps you
have yourself set to "don't receive own posts"?
Anyways, are you sure that the contents of /usr/vice/etc/CellServDB
for the local cell are correct? Also, can you reach each of the
IPs that you get from a DNS lookup for the ser
Hello, openafs list:
I sent this last night, but it did not appear yet, sorry if you get two copies.
Our Sysadmin built an openafs server with very much storage and he
says Windows clients access it without delay. On my Linux systems,
however, I observe some very strange/sluggish behavior. And
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:
Thus spake Derrick J Brashear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What's the reason for this behaviour? What has changed between before
and after the first attempt to start the client? Just the kernel
error I pasted in my previous mail or is there something else forci
Thus spake Derrick J Brashear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >What's the reason for this behaviour? What has changed between before
> >and after the first attempt to start the client? Just the kernel
> >error I pasted in my previous mail or is there something else forcing
> >me to reboot?
>
> no, the kern
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Hendrik Hoeth wrote:
Hi,
Thus spake Derrick J Brashear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
you'll need to reboot. otherwise, it won't work.
Thanks!
What's the reason for this behaviour? What has changed between before
and after the first attempt to start the client? Just the kernel er
Hi,
Thus spake Derrick J Brashear ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> you'll need to reboot. otherwise, it won't work.
Thanks!
What's the reason for this behaviour? What has changed between before
and after the first attempt to start the client? Just the kernel error I
pasted in my previous mail or is there
11 matches
Mail list logo
