So I've got MIT kerberos up and running in my dev Cell and it's
great. Thanks to all those who help regarding my last post.
Now I'm a little confused, regarding the changing of a password,
should I be using the MIT kpasswd or the openafs one? using the MIT
I get the error that is in the s
On Tuesday, February 28, 2006 03:10:41 PM -0500 Ken Hornstein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That seems to say that you have an AFSDB record for
research.cs.berkeley.edu pointing to afs.research.cs.berkeley.edu, which
is a CNAME for research.cs.berkeley.edu, which has no records other than
the A
On Friday, February 24, 2006 06:07:42 PM -0500 Michael Conrad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I'm attempting to get OpenAFS compiled on Gentoo, kernel 2.6.15, on an
UltraSparc. My problem *seems* to be that Gentoo doesn't officially
support sparc64 by default (and doesn't have 64-bit mode in
On Monday, February 13, 2006 11:04:45 AM -0900 ted creedon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone send a link to the NW Air Presentation from the 2005
workshop?
I believe the presentation you're referring to is the one Kim Kimball did
about United. The abstract and slides for this talk a
On Monday, February 13, 2006 02:11:06 PM -0500 "James E. Dobson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have a working afsdump_scan for large files? I have a ~180G
dumpfile that I'm trying to repair the root directory with. Looks like
this might do it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ ./afsdump_
On Saturday, February 11, 2006 02:03:45 PM -0900 ted creedon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The http://www.openafs.org site timing out, but it does ping.
In general, the readership of the openafs-info or openafs-devel lists
cannot answer this sort of question. While the people who can do som
Excellent! This is just what I was hoping for. the code is
even commented, what a concept ;)
Thanks for making this available, Matt.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 05:41:39PM -0500, Matthew E Hoskins - SAGE AFS wrote:
> Hey Dan, this is EXACTLY what we do. I have a perl script that handles
> full
> > Wed Mar 1 05:38:57 2006 trans 472 on volume 536870933 is older
> > than 300 seconds
> AFAIK, that's just an informative log entry.
> It's telling you that the volume release took longer than X seconds.
> It's nothing wrong with that.
That's what I gathered from the old messages from the l
On Mar 1, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
Hi!
I hit a strange error this morning. I did a little mass-resync of our
read-only replicas this morning (it was a bos cron job, ran at 5:30
in the
morning with absolutely no users around). Vos release reported
success for
all volumes, but Vols
