Quoting Jason Edgecombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Derek Atkins wrote:
Things seem to be working with the following oddities:
[snip]
10:openafs-kernel ###
[ 83%]
FATAL: Could not rename
/lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2519.4.21.el5/modules.dep.temp into
/lib/m
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:57:37PM -0500, zeroguy wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:25:33 +0200 (CEST)
> Jan Pospisil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, on debians, there are onlu libraires in /lib (as the name
> > suggests), not executalbles. But really, creating symling helped. In
> > my o
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 01:27:32 PM -0700 Mike Polek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When we attempted to go to 1.5.9, we had more complaints
that with the 1.4.1 series.
Well, Jeff is on vacation, too, but I think he'd say something like "I
can't fix problems I d
#1
Somebody said FHS requires '/lib/cpp'; this is true. Here's exactly
what it says:
( FHS 2.3 )
f> ...
f> If a C preprocessor is installed, /lib/cpp must be a reference to it, for
f> historical reasons. [13]
f> ...
f> /lib : Alternate format essential shared libraries (optional)
f> ..
f>
On Oct 25, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 05:58:46 PM -0400 Robert Banz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way (hacking the code is ok) to require, from the
fileserver
side, that authenticated clients encrypt content?
Almost, but not qui
Derek Atkins wrote:
Things seem to be working with the following oddities:
[snip]
10:openafs-kernel ###
[ 83%]
FATAL: Could not rename
/lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2519.4.21.el5/modules.dep.temp into
/lib/modules/2.6.17-1.2519.4.21.el5/modules.dep: Perm
On 10/25/06, Bastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Christopher D. Clausen schreef:
> Bastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think it is a hardware problem, since other file transfers (in
this case scp) have normal speed.
Before I knew non-afs transfers were normal, I tried different ports
though
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 05:58:46 PM -0400 Robert Banz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a way (hacking the code is ok) to require, from the fileserver
side, that authenticated clients encrypt content?
Almost, but not quite.
You can have the fileserver create its rxkad security o
Just curious,
Is there a way (hacking the code is ok) to require, from the
fileserver side, that authenticated clients encrypt content?
-rob
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-i
> Thanks for this quick reply. Yes, my testfile is larger than the cache.
> It is 250MB
> AFSD options: -stat 2000 -dcache 800 -daemons 3 -volumes 70 -fakestat
> -afsdb -nosettime
> (these are the Debian defaults)
> Client options: 'client', afsdb, crypt and fakestat are set, dynroot is
> no
Christopher D. Clausen schreef:
Bastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a very strange performance issue. One of my afs clients is
extremely slow when copying files from and to afs (<100 KB/sec).
It know it hasn't been slow from the beginnning.
What afsd options are you using? And are you c
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 03:58:12 PM -0500 "Christopher D. Clausen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it a hardware problem?
Don't assume the answer is "no" just because some other transfer method
works. Hardware and network problems, especially bizarre ones, affect
different protocol
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 01:27:32 PM -0700 Mike Polek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When we attempted to go to 1.5.9, we had more complaints
that with the 1.4.1 series.
Well, Jeff is on vacation, too, but I think he'd say something like "I
can't fix problems I don't know about".
If
Paul Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Script started on Wed Oct 25 16:13:19 2006
# modload misc/nfssrv
# /etc/init.d/afs start
Entry for afs already exists in /etc/name_to_sysnum
Loading NFS server kernel extensions
Loading AFS kernel extensions
can't load module: Operation not applicable
Star
Bastian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a very strange performance issue. One of my afs clients is
extremely slow when copying files from and to afs (<100 KB/sec).
It know it hasn't been slow from the beginnning.
What afsd options are you using? And are you copying files that are
larger tha
Mike Polek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Use the 1.5.10 installers. 1.4.2 does not support
inline bulk stat RPCs. I'm sure that performing 15,000
RPCs to read the contents of a directory is going to
take some time.
When we attempted to go to 1.5.9, we had more complaints
t
Hello all,
I have a very strange performance issue. One of my afs clients is
extremely slow when copying files from and to afs (<100 KB/sec).
It know it hasn't been slow from the beginnning.
Another client (similar hardware) shows an acceptable performance
(>1500KB/sec).
Non-openafs file transf
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
Mike Polek wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a challenge with my Windows users. We've
upgraded to OpenAFSforWindows-DEBUG-1-4-2a.exe, and the
issue persists.
Use the 1.5.10 installers. 1.4.2 does not support
inline bulk stat RPCs. I'm sure that performing 15,000
RPCs to read the
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
You need to do what it says - load the misc/nfssrv module:
modload misc/nfssrv
"duh!" Right. OK I've loaded the nfssrv module, and the error message
regarding nsfsrv is no longer beign written to the messages file, however,
I'm still blowing o
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 03:32:39 PM -0400 Paul Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oct 25 14:54:42 suntest afs: [ID 718928 kern.notice] misc/nfssrv module
must be loaded before loading afs with nfs-xlator
I see that this original post was never followed up, nor can I find
anythig re
Hello,
I'm trying to install openAFS on a Sun x4100 (SunOS 5.10
Generic_118855-14 i86pc i386 i86pc) and I've reached the same problems as
were reported a year ago.
Back on Dec 17, 2005, Chas Williams wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Erland Fristedt"
writes:
bash-3.00# modload /kerne
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:25:33 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Pospisil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, on debians, there are onlu libraires in /lib (as the name
> suggests), not executalbles. But really, creating symling helped. In
> my opinion this is not the standard solution, is it?
>
> What other people th
Hi Ron,
I don't have Fedora, but there should be similarities to RedHat packages.
Issue "rpm -qa | grep kernel", you will see all the packages installed
relating to the kernel.
kernel-smp.x.x.x.x.x.x
kernel-utils.x.x.x.x.x.x
kernel-source.x.x.x.x.x
There may also be some openafs-kernel packages
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 10:35 am, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> > it is not in /lib/cpp, but
> > in /usr/bin/cpp. This is the standard location on all Linuxes I've ever
> > seen (Debian, RH, SuSe, Scientific, ...).
>
> If there's no /lib/cpp, then you have a problem. Fix the problem, instead
> o
Haven't the gnu people been on a rampage recently to discourage the use of
cpp? I seem to remember running into this recently trying to preprocess
.xresources on ubuntu.
I have to agree with Derrick and Jeffrey that if you don't have /lib/cpp,
then it isn't installed, and installing it is your so
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
"I don't believe you".
hmm, in some situations it is good to expect some absolute idiot to be on
the other side, but in this case you should believe me, I have "some"
experience and not writing about this problem "just for fun".
Please send th
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
>> it is not in /lib/cpp, but
>> in /usr/bin/cpp. This is the standard location on all Linuxes I've ever
>> seen (Debian, RH, SuSe, Scientific, ...).
>
> If there's no /lib/cpp, then you have a problem. Fix the problem,
> instead of trying to argue with me about filesyst
> Of course I have cpp installed, but once more, it is not in /lib/cpp,
> but in /usr/bin/cpp. This is the standard location on all Linuxes I've
> ever seen (Debian, RH, SuSe, Scientific, ...).
If it's any use to know, all of my Debian derived systems (sarge, ubuntu
dapper, and ubuntu hoary) have
Note that I said nothing about "openafs".. I said "kernel-devel"
and I MEANT kernel-devel.
You didn't need kernel-devel with OpenSSI because you were building
the kernel from source and therefore installing /lib/modules/* by
hand. In this case, however, you're trying to build against the
distr
No I didn't install the kernel-devel rpm, I installed this one:
openafs-1.4.2-fc5.1.src.rpm
Shoul;d I install kernel-devel too ? I think I never installed that
one, not even when I made OpenAFS work with OpenSSI
I did install the kernel source too.
thanks,
Ron
Derek Atkins wrote:
Wait,
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 07:07:36 PM +0200 Jan Pospisil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course I have cpp installed
Well, Derrick is on vacation, so I'm going to channel him...
"I don't believe you".
Please send the output of 'dpkg-query -l cpp'
it is not in /lib/cpp, but
in /usr/
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 05:08:47 PM +0200 Jan Pospisil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, I've just found two more issues:
1. In the source distribution openafs-1.4.2-src.tar (available on the
web), and therefore as well as in the openafs-m
Wait, did you install the kernel-devel RPM? This error
is coming from openafs-kernel-version.sh where it's trying
to determine your current kernel version.. But this file should
exist, if you have the kernel headers installed. Do you?
-derek
Ron Croonenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok,
Ok,
I installed FC5 and I also installed the kernel source.
Then I tried to rebuild the rpms:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAFS]# rpmbuild --rebuild --target x86_64
openafs-1.4.2-fc5.1.src.rpm
Installing openafs-1.4.2-fc5.1.src.rpm
Building target platforms: x86_64
Building for target x86_64
/bin/ls:
> Now, having disabled all AFS-related pam entries, I found another thing
> I'm not able to give account of:
>
> When doing an "su -" (on a system with an unpatched syscall table), the
> root shell doesn't show the two additional groups anymore. The "tokens"
> command tells me that I don't have a t
Hi all,
I recently upgraded from 1.4.2 on a WinXP sp2 machine to 1.5.10 via
EXE. After the upgrade, user drive mappings appear to not be working well.
Specifically, I can add new drive mappings on the Drive Letters tab of
the AFS Client Configuration dialog, but instead of showing the drive
lett
Geez, the OpenAFS RPM is self-help-describing.. Also, I've described
this multiple times on this list. Also, "man rpmbuild"...
rpmbuild --rebuild openafssrc.rpm
-derek
Quoting Ron Croonenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, I might be able to give it a shot...
But since I am a rookie at th
Ok, I might be able to give it a shot...
But since I am a rookie at this...
How was that done again ?
it was something with rpm and rpmbuild... right ?
Ron
Derek Atkins wrote:
I dont think Derrick built FC5 x86_64 RPMs, so you'll have to
build them yourself from the SRPM.
-derek
Quoting
2 years ago I dragged and dropped 55,000 files from win to afs.
After some carping, the developers did something to make it work.
If you like I can do it again. But it would be for 1.5.11 (which is what is
on the website labelled 1.5.10).
Tedc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/24/2006 03:26 PM, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
>> *) I've noticed that with openafs 1.4.2 with keyring support enabled,
>> doing an "su" will keep the token but returning from the root shell will
>> discard the token (see below). Previous (setgroups() based)
>> implementations didn't sho
40 matches
Mail list logo
