Hey all,
I'm working with OpenSuSe 10.1 systems which authenticate against active
directory. User homedirs are located on AFS completely.
Recently I've started using the program krenew to renew my krb5 ticket and afs
token in order to be able to leave the computer running for a longer period
I am trying to install the OpenAFS 1.4.2 on FC5. These are the
characteristic of my machine
uname -a
Linux podda-nb.frascati.enea.it 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar
14 16:05:46 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Using the package for the kernel module:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I'm working with OpenSuSe 10.1 systems which authenticate against active
directory. User homedirs are located on AFS completely.
Recently I've started using the program krenew to renew my krb5 ticket
and afs token in order to be able to leave the computer
Cache manager is unhappy with latest Solaris 10 kernel changes,
at least for 1.4.2.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6522244
Is there a version available yet with corresponding fix?
-- David Boldt
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, David R Boldt wrote:
Cache manager is unhappy with latest Solaris 10 kernel changes,
at least for 1.4.2.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6522244
Is there a version available yet with corresponding fix?
Try 1.4.3rc2? We took some relevant fixes there.
I
Hi,
After a long time of struggling I managed to get openafs to compile under
Opensuse 10.2. Version is 1.4.2.
Now I wanted to configure afs. But when I start
/usr/local/sbin/bosserver -noauth
Boslog says:
server Directory access is okay
Now, when I try to initialize the afs cell, I get the
in the case of the mit cells, we wanted to have multiple cells under one
kerberos realm...it was easier to manage a single realm, rather than a
realm for each cell.
cheers,
anne
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
You mean like say a krb5 realm named ATHENA.MIT.EDU supporting a cell
named
From what I hear from our windows guys, most apps don't. I'd guestimate
at 95%.
Some of those apps might work with customized wrapper scripts, but for
the most part not.
Add to that that most apps don't deal well when run as a normal
(non-admin) user.
In general, the apps that tend to be
Hello folks,
Given:
a. A volume is moved
b. The moved-from fileserver breaks all callbacks for that volume.
c. A given client does not see the break callback message.
What happens?
IIRC the file server puts the client on a client down list and ignores
the client until the client contacts
Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
ted creedon wrote:
Have openafs users been affected by
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2006/m06-16.pdf ?
Anyone who is a Fed (or a Fed contractor) has had to deal
with that memo, and address the issues (quite some time
ago, actually). Primarily, the point
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Michael Greiner wrote:
Hi,
After a long time of struggling I managed to get openafs to compile under
Opensuse 10.2. Version is 1.4.2.
Now I wanted to configure afs. But when I start
/usr/local/sbin/bosserver -noauth
Boslog says:
server Directory access is okay
Now, when I
This was first noticed when Solaris 10 11/06 was released with kernel patch
118833-33, and hit the rest of our Solaris 10 systems when they released
kernel patch 118833-36. There is a fix for it, please read these postings
from December:
Lars Schimmer wrote:
Hi!
Has anyone started a list (in a wiki or for only his own usage) of
software for windows (workstations) which runs out of OpenAFS filespace?
E.G. mplayer or media player classic should do without any problems.
But are there more?
MfG,
Lars Schimmer
Microsoft
Kim Kimball wrote:
Hello folks,
Given:
a. A volume is moved
b. The moved-from fileserver breaks all callbacks for that volume.
c. A given client does not see the break callback message.
What happens?
IIRC the file server puts the client on a client down list and ignores
the client
After some further investigation, it appears that our problem is with a
server running on a 64-bit machine (x86_64):
I can create two volumes: one on a 64-bit server and another on a 32-bit
server (i386). It seems that the problem might be with the cache
write-through to the 64-bit server. The
In both cases, both client and server are on the same side of the firewall.
W. Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most people who get this error have the problem immediately after
they log in. In my case, it consistently happens during large file
transfers. The problem occurs when I am
I was curious because I've supplied laptops and SCADA software for a
power plant at a Missile Defense Site. There's less than zero chance the
laptops could be stolen or lost.
Needless to say no one is concerned and I am just curious. Is any file
data for the win AFS client left resident on the
Hi!
Has anyone started a list (in a wiki or for only his own usage) of
software for windows (workstations) which runs out of OpenAFS filespace?
E.G. mplayer or media player classic should do without any problems.
But are there more?
Well, you can add to the list a product called
Hi all,
I'm currently investigating several options for a back-end storage
system for an internet application. One of the solutions I'm
investigating is open-afs and I'm wondering if open-afs is situated
to this type of application.
Some background: we have 4 front-end http servers
Handling the destruction of the disks is covered in the OM manuals for this
project.
There will be other projects in the future. Jeffrey's comment is useful.
Tedc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Derrick J Brashear
Sent: Wednesday,
Hello all,
I managed to compile OpenAFS 1.4.3rc2 on FC6, however installing it is
a different story. Kinda a bit of a rookie here when it comes to that, I
am used to installing things with rpms.
How do I install rc2 on an FC6 machine ? Do I just install an earlier
version and then update
Richard Human [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we're looking at open-afs. We are thinking of a situation where we
have a cell of 2+ servers on the back-end with our data spread over a
number of volumes, that we can move around. This takes care of the
scalability issue. For redundancy we would
Hi,
Yes, although I haven't quite got my head around how I would fit the
replicated volumes into the architecture. I was thinking of a
scenario where I would have the r/w volume on one server in the cell
and would replicate to at least 1 other server in the cell. So
probably at least 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Richard,
OpenAFS definitely has been used in (some variant of) this way, with at
least some success. You might find some reference to such on the
openafs-info list from a few years go. I have not seen formal
discussion of the results.
Matt
Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Michael Greiner wrote:
Hi,
After a long time of struggling I managed to get openafs to compile
under
Opensuse 10.2. Version is 1.4.2.
Now I wanted to configure afs. But when I start
/usr/local/sbin/bosserver -noauth
Boslog says:
server
W. Mark Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does rxdebug server 7000 -version return?
AFS version: OpenAFS 1.4.1 built 2006-05-19
Can you try the 1.4.2 series? Or maybe the 1.4.3rc2 release? (On both
the client and server.)
CDC
___
So, in concert with the Symantec Client Firewall, we've seen some systems give
the network path not found when accessing ThisCell. Usually, this goes away
after a while as specified in:
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2007-January/024992.html
Note that network path not
How big is your working set? If it won't fit in your afs cache, you will
not be happy.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
We have a bulk admin feature in our mailman install, though it's an out
of date revision. Anyone willing to diff it out and port it forward, for
contribution back to mailman?
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
Currently OpenAFS offers 2 trees, one development (the 1.5 series) and one
stable (the 1.4 series), though this model has been strained as we have
continued to support more versions of more platforms.
1) devel versus stable doesn't adequately characterize the trees when
the 1.5 tree is now
Hi Everyone,
I'm going through the Authlog of our kas server to see who is still
using it. We're doing this to prepare for turning off kas.
I've found some weird message in the authlog and was hoping that someone
could shed some light on them.
Wed Jan 10 19:59:36 2007 Larry
a couple of things to think about before plowing ahead...first, don't
forget about the afs cache on your webservers, and think about how you
will update files and coordinate the vos releasing of the volumes.
if it is critical for the webservers to all see exactly the same data at
exactly the
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:30:07AM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Jakub Witkowski wrote:
No, no oops. The system just... blocks. You can interact with programs
already in memory, access open files, but not open new.
I chose .14 mostly because I was having problems
Having that tasklist dump (alt sysrq t) would be helpful, before you
switch.
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
Actually, when it's hung in 1.5.x getting a task list (alt-sysrq-t) would
be useful, if you can do it.
I believe I have this problem with 1.5.14 with AFS as the root
Dave Botsch wrote:
So, in concert with the Symantec Client Firewall, we've seen some systems give
the network path not found when accessing ThisCell. Usually, this goes away
after a while as specified in:
http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2007-January/024992.html
Note
Jason Edgecombe wrote:
and what is this:
Sat Jan 6 21:52:10 2007 OPENAFS-KDC-PROBE,afs:auth from xx
I see lots of these.
afscreds checking to see if the KDC is reachable before giving the user
the option of obtaining a Kerberos TGT
Jeffrey Altman
Secure Endpoints Inc.
smime.p7s
36 matches
Mail list logo
