Bastian wrote:
Hello all,
When I compile the openafs-module with kernel 2.6.18 from Debian Etch,
Linux reports 0 bytes (free, total and available) for the AFS filesystem
under /afs (one can tell by using df).
Apart from that, AFS works fine, but some applications think /afs is out
of disk space
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAFS]# rpm -q --provides
kernel-smp-devel-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
package kernel-smp-devel-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 is not installed
but:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAFS]# rpm -q --provides kernel-devel-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
kernel-devel-i686 = 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
kernel-devel = 2.6.15-1.2054_FC
Actually, this does look like a bug in the SPECfile. Try the attached
patch. I've bcc'd to openafs-bugs to try to get this patch upstream.
Back in October 2006 I fixed it for all the different kernels EXCEPT
I seemed to have missed SMP. OOPS.
-derek
Quoting Ron Croonenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello all,
When I compile the openafs-module with kernel 2.6.18 from Debian Etch,
Linux reports 0 bytes (free, total and available) for the AFS filesystem
under /afs (one can tell by using df).
Apart from that, AFS works fine, but some applications think /afs is out
of disk space and will not ru
Unfortunately I don't know what SPEC file was used to build the code.
The SPEC file in MY code basically does:
%if %{kprovidesarch}
Requires: kernel-smp-%{_target_cpu} = %{kernvers}
%else
Requires: /boot/config-%{kernvers}%{?smp_ext:%{smp_ext}}
%endif
Where kprovidesarch runs the following code:
On Monday, February 26, 2007 01:28:10 PM +0100 Alexander Al
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
We have here a openAFS 1.4.x system on a FC5 server and the users have a
quota of 1GB. But the trick is how do you give the users a signal that
they almost through their quota?
If you feel a need
And of course you're going to require another round trip because
you didn't give me the info I wanted, which is namely the
"rpm -q --provides" output from the kernel-smp package you
have installed.. So, again, what does that give you?
-derek
Quoting Ron Croonenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL
But when I do this...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAFS]# rpm -q --provides kernel-smp-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
kernel = 2.6.15
kernel-drm = 4.3.0
kernel-i686 = 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp
kernel-smp = 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
And this is just a "straight out of the box" installation using the
distro from fedora.redhat.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -q --provides kernel-smp-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp
package kernel-smp-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp is not installed
but:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -r
2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp
and then ? :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-smp-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5
>>> Derek Atkins <[
What do you get from:
rpm -q --provides kernel-smp-2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp
-derek
Ron Croonenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am installing OpenAFS for FC5
>
> When I try to install the OpenAFS kernel module this happens:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAFS]# uname -r
> 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp
>
> So
On Sunday, February 25, 2007 04:21:45 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A while back I designed such an API, which I called the generic
credential store API (GCS-API) that provides a way to get a handle to
the current credential store for a given thread, process, session o
I am installing OpenAFS for FC5
When I try to install the OpenAFS kernel module this happens:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAFS]# uname -r
2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp
So I want to use this pre-compiled kernel module, right ?
openafs-kernel-smp-1.4.2-2.6.15_1.2054_FC5smp_1.i686.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenA
Hello,
I am making use of OpenAFS (mostly 1.4.1, some 1.4.0) on a network of
Debian/Ubuntu Linux client machines, with a Debian Linux server.
I have encountered intermittent cases where a file written/modified on
another system is not visible/updated unless the (receiving) machine
flushes the
Hi,
A token for the apache process is not required for a read-only setup.
That said, you will need a token or IP ACL for write access.
Tell apache to use public_html in the users home folder and then run the
following commands to give anonymous access to the proper folders.
fs sa ~ system:a
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:47:38PM -0800, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >BTW, a PAG facility that's faithful to the AFS notion of PAGs
> >should be
> >relatively easy to specify and implement for Solaris, but it will be
> >more involved than you mi
BTW, Solaris tasks approach the semantics of PAGs. See settaskid(2).
They're not quite what you want for two reasons: a) they're already in
use for something else, so you don't know that someone isn't going to
change a process' taskid without doing the AFS thing to keep credentials
associated wit
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 02:21:08AM -0500, Marcus Watts wrote:
> Going the other way from what Nico proposes, why not have a very
> general per-module way for modules to add resources per-process?
>
> There's really only a few points where the "generic" environment
> needs to interact with the modu
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:47:38PM -0800, Henry B. Hotz wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > >BTW, a PAG facility that's faithful to the AFS notion of PAGs
> > >should be
> > >relatively easy to specify and implement fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Kula wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:52:14PM +0100, Alexander Al wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a openAFS-server on FC5 and in time we will provide
>> a X window terminal server on our network. The latter isn't the problem.
>> But there is also
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:52:14PM +0100, Alexander Al wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a openAFS-server on FC5 and in time we will provide
> a X window terminal server on our network. The latter isn't the problem.
> But there is also a request for servicing a Webserver. Now I have here
> a problem, is th
Well, you have to give your apache-server a token
at startup and set the ACL on the public-html dir so that the apache can
read it using this token. That's all.
There are a number of mails on this list how to give a daemon a
persistent token.
Christof
Alexander Al wrote:
Hi,
We have a open
Hi,
We have a openAFS-server on FC5 and in time we will provide
a X window terminal server on our network. The latter isn't the problem.
But there is also a request for servicing a Webserver. Now I have here
a problem, is there a system or method that users can have a public_html
folder in their h
Hello,
We have here a openAFS 1.4.x system on a FC5 server and the users have a
quota of 1GB. But the trick is how do you give the users a signal that
they almost through their quota?
regards,
Alexander.
--
Alexander Al
Leiden, Die Niederlande
___
O
ted creedon wrote:
Thanks. Looks like NFS requires it?
tedc
Well, I don't quite get youre question, I'm afraid.
AFS at least requires it.
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
24 matches
Mail list logo
