testing
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
Anyone have any real world experience they are willing to share on how
AFS compares with current implementations of NFSv4?
I'm doing some research on deploying AFS vs. NFSv4 and trying to
understand which might be better at this point in time. Specifically,
I'm in interested in the
I ran across the below paragraph in an IBM document at
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246657.pdf (page 7). When
talking about NFSv4, they said:
*
NFS has evolved into a powerful enterprise file system that enables it
to take
advantage of today's more powerful servers and
Hi everybody.
I'm back to ask you for a strange behaviour i'm experiencing:
doing a vos ex volid, the correspondant volume results on-line.
doing a vos listvol server hosting the previous volid, i can notice that
this volid is unattacheable.
A little dump follows:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:01:11AM -0400, Jesse W. Asher wrote:
I ran across the below paragraph in an IBM document at
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246657.pdf (page 7). When
talking about NFSv4, they said:
*
NFS has evolved into a powerful enterprise file system
Jesse W. Asher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any real world experience they are willing to share on how
AFS compares with current implementations of NFSv4?
This is the best comparison I've come across:
http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~mitch/afsvsnfs.html
CDC
On 7/23/07, Jesse W. Asher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran across the below paragraph in an IBM document at
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246657.pdf (page 7). When
talking about NFSv4, they said:
*
NFS has evolved into a powerful enterprise file system that enables it to
take
On 7/23/07, Alessio Rocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm back to ask you for a strange behaviour i'm experiencing:
doing a vos ex volid, the correspondant volume results on-line.
doing a vos listvol server hosting the previous volid, i can notice that
this volid is unattacheable.
On Jul 23, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Jesse W. Asher wrote:
Anyone have any real world experience they are willing to share on
how AFS compares with current implementations of NFSv4?
I'm doing some research on deploying AFS vs. NFSv4 and trying to
understand which might be better at this point
Steve Simmons wrote:
On Jul 23, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Jesse W. Asher wrote:
Anyone have any real world experience they are willing to share on
how AFS compares with current implementations of NFSv4?
I'm doing some research on deploying AFS vs. NFSv4 and trying to
understand which might be
On 7/23/07, Bruce Orchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last few days, kernel 2.6.22 was released as an update for Fedora
7. A build from source of Openafs 1.4.4 fails with the following message:
We's distributing RPMs for it now. yum should be able to update you.
(Thanks to Simon
11 matches
Mail list logo