Hello everybody,
I'm new here... I want to ask you a question: I'm trying to install an
afs-client using Scientific Linux Cern 4.5. The problem is that I think i've
done everything right, but when I reboot my computer, the CellServDB changes
alone, and doesn't contain the new servers that I
Hi Lara
You have to make your changes in '/usr/vice/etc/CellServDB.local'
That file and '/usr/vice/etc/CellServDB.dist' is merged to form the
final CellServDB.
/Mikkel
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 12:25 +0100, Lara Lloret Iglesias wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm new here... I want to ask you a
Hi again,
Thank you very much for your answer, it doesn't change now :)
But now i've another problem in another AFS-client, even if my CellServDB file
is the same, with all the servers that i wanted, when i write
ls /afs
the only server that i found is cern.ch. None of all the other servers
the only server that i found is cern.ch
I guess the only _cell_ you found.
Depending on if you use the dynamic /afs root feature or not, the
content of /afs is generated from CellServDB or the content that
the sysadmin did put into the volume root.afs.
Harald.
Yes, I meant cell :)
Sorry, I don't understand.
When the content of AFS is not generated by CellServDB what should I do?
Lara
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
$ /usr/openafs/sbin/afsd -help
Usage: /usr/openafs/sbin/afsd [-blocks 1024 byte blocks in cache] [-files
files in cache] [-rootvol name of AFS root volume] [-stat number of stat
entries] [-memcache] [-cachedir cache directory] [-mountdir mount
location] [-daemons number of daemons to use]
I'm experiencing poor AFS performance on under Sparc solaris 9 09/05HW
running Openafs server 1.4.1 on a Sun StorageTeck 3511 Fibre channel to
SATA array
At first, I thought that having UFS logging disabled was the culprit,
but I have enabled UFS logging and I am using the namei server, but
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jason Edgecombe writes:
array
My bonnie++ performance numbers for vicepa are here:
http://www.coe.uncc.edu/~jwedgeco/bonnie.html
What could AFS be doing that causes the performance to stink?
run strace on fileserver/volserver and see what its doing as far
as i/o.
Lara Lloret Iglesias [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I meant cell :)
Sorry, I don't understand.
When the content of AFS is not generated by CellServDB what should I do?
cd /afs/athena.mit.edu/
This will automagically create athena.mit.edu if you're using
dynroot. I'm PRETTY sure that it
Why are these files being removed, anyway?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:03:41PM -0800, Darren Patterson wrote:
It seems that the libafsauthent and libafsrpc libraries aren't being
removed correctly when rebuilding openafs 1.4.5 from SRPM. This throws
an error before the RPMs are generated.
If you build without the authlibs rpm, you are asking to not have these.
Look at the change in the context below.
On Nov 28, 2007 11:20 AM, Dave Botsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are these files being removed, anyway?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 05:03:41PM -0800, Darren Patterson wrote:
It
chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],Jason Edgecombe writes:
array
My bonnie++ performance numbers for vicepa are here:
http://www.coe.uncc.edu/~jwedgeco/bonnie.html
What could AFS be doing that causes the performance to stink?
run strace on
Hello
I'm working on solving an AFS issue that has been a problem at my
employer before I arrived here. Performance in general has been poor,
much slower than NFS. I ran bonnie++ to check this out and apparently
read/write performance was not bad, it was file creation, deletion and
renaming
On Nov 28, 2007 3:20 PM, Jerry Normandin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I'm working on solving an AFS issue that has been a problem at my
employer before I arrived here. Performance in general has been poor, much
slower than NFS. I ran bonnie++ to check this out and apparently
On Nov 28, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
I'm experiencing poor AFS performance on under Sparc solaris 9 09/05HW
running Openafs server 1.4.1 on a Sun StorageTeck 3511 Fibre
channel to
SATA array
At first, I thought that having UFS logging disabled was the culprit,
but I have
Jason Edgecombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chapter1:
* about upgrading OS:
**Should the namei fileserver be mentioned? Is namei the
recommended way?
inode is still recommended for Solaris. namei is recommended in all other
cases, and generally is the only possible method.
On Nov 28, 2007 11:03 PM, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Edgecombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
chapter1:
* about upgrading OS:
**Should the namei fileserver be mentioned? Is namei the
recommended way?
inode is still recommended for Solaris. namei is recommended
17 matches
Mail list logo
